Importance and Impact of the Poultry Red Mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) in Layer Farms - Analysis of Farmers’ Perception

IF 0.4 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Macedonian Veterinary Review Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.2478/macvetrev-2021-0026
Miroslav Kjosevski, D. Tomić, A. Dodovski
{"title":"Importance and Impact of the Poultry Red Mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) in Layer Farms - Analysis of Farmers’ Perception","authors":"Miroslav Kjosevski, D. Tomić, A. Dodovski","doi":"10.2478/macvetrev-2021-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Poultry red mite (PRM), Dermanyssus gallinae, causes egg drop production, anemia and can be a vector in transmitting diseases. The PRM control mainly focuses on usage of the conventional chemical biocides. The objective of this study was to analyze the farmers’ perception regarding the impact, management and control of PRM in Macedonian layer farms. The data were collected with direct on-site visits using a unified questionnaire. In total, 29 poultry farms (28% of farms in the country), all with conventional cages, were part of this study. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, inferential statistics and Naïve Bayes Classifier technique. In 30% of the poultry farms the farmers had observed that the flock was infested with PRM. In total, 32 different treatments against PRM were reported from the farmers, and three of them were non-biocide treatments. The most used biocides (17% of the farms) were crude oil, Formalin, Neopitroid® and disinfectants. The highest agreement regarding biocides application among the farms (38%) was before the production starts. Most of the farmers applied biocides routinely, before the infestation is evident (75%). The median costs for PRM treatment were 175€ per flock, higher in the infested farms 493±677€ compared to non - infested 100±71€, p<0.05. None of the Macedonian farmers included in the study was using monitoring method for PRM infestation, contributing to poor data records. This study highlights the need of developing unified strategy for PRM control included in the Integrated Pest Management in poultry layer farms.","PeriodicalId":18099,"journal":{"name":"Macedonian Veterinary Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"211 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macedonian Veterinary Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/macvetrev-2021-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Poultry red mite (PRM), Dermanyssus gallinae, causes egg drop production, anemia and can be a vector in transmitting diseases. The PRM control mainly focuses on usage of the conventional chemical biocides. The objective of this study was to analyze the farmers’ perception regarding the impact, management and control of PRM in Macedonian layer farms. The data were collected with direct on-site visits using a unified questionnaire. In total, 29 poultry farms (28% of farms in the country), all with conventional cages, were part of this study. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, inferential statistics and Naïve Bayes Classifier technique. In 30% of the poultry farms the farmers had observed that the flock was infested with PRM. In total, 32 different treatments against PRM were reported from the farmers, and three of them were non-biocide treatments. The most used biocides (17% of the farms) were crude oil, Formalin, Neopitroid® and disinfectants. The highest agreement regarding biocides application among the farms (38%) was before the production starts. Most of the farmers applied biocides routinely, before the infestation is evident (75%). The median costs for PRM treatment were 175€ per flock, higher in the infested farms 493±677€ compared to non - infested 100±71€, p<0.05. None of the Macedonian farmers included in the study was using monitoring method for PRM infestation, contributing to poor data records. This study highlights the need of developing unified strategy for PRM control included in the Integrated Pest Management in poultry layer farms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家禽红螨在蛋鸡养殖场的重要性和影响——农户认知分析
摘要鸡红螨(PRM)是一种引起产蛋下降、贫血的疾病,是传播疾病的媒介。PRM控制主要集中在常规化学杀生物剂的使用上。本研究的目的是分析马其顿蛋鸡养殖场农民对PRM的影响、管理和控制的看法。数据是通过使用统一问卷进行直接现场访问收集的。总共有29个家禽养殖场(占全国养殖场的28%)参与了这项研究,所有养殖场都有传统的笼子。采用描述性统计、推理统计和朴素贝叶斯分类器技术对数据进行分析。在30%的家禽养殖场,农民观察到鸡群感染了PRM。农民总共报告了32种不同的PRM处理方法,其中三种是非杀生物剂处理。使用最多的杀生物剂(17%的农场)是原油、福尔马林、Neopitroid®和消毒剂。农场之间关于杀生物剂应用的最高协议(38%)是在生产开始之前。大多数农民在虫害明显之前(75%)都会常规使用杀生物剂。PRM治疗的中位费用为每群175欧元,感染农场的费用为493±677欧元,高于未感染农场的100±71欧元,p<0.05。研究中没有一名马其顿农民使用PRM侵扰监测方法,导致数据记录不佳。这项研究强调了制定统一的PRM控制策略的必要性,该策略包含在家禽蛋鸡场的综合害虫管理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Macedonian Veterinary Review
Macedonian Veterinary Review Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Bifidobacterium animalis Subsp. Lactis and Vitamin D on Immunological Response Following Vaccination in Puppies First Report of Bartonella Henselae Infection in a Cat in North Macedonia Determination of the Expression of Bone Morphogen Protein 15 and its Receptors in Laying Hens’ Ovary Effect of Seminal Plasma Protein Fractions on Cooled Dog Semen Kinetics Immunohistochemical Diagnostic Characteristics of Parvovirus Infection in Dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1