Closing the Poor-Rich Gap in Contraceptive Use in Rwanda: Understanding the Underlying Mechanisms.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2019-10-04 DOI:10.1363/45e7519
Dieudonne Ndaruhuye Muhoza, C. Ruhara
{"title":"Closing the Poor-Rich Gap in Contraceptive Use in Rwanda: Understanding the Underlying Mechanisms.","authors":"Dieudonne Ndaruhuye Muhoza, C. Ruhara","doi":"10.1363/45e7519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nEvidence suggests that as Rwanda has strengthened its family planning program, disparities in contraceptive use by socioeconomic status have narrowed. However, the changes in these gaps, and the mechanisms that underlie them, are not well understood.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData from the 2005, 2010 and 2015 Rwanda Demographic and Health Surveys on 19,028 in-union women aged 15-49 were analyzed to examine trends in socioeconomic disparities in contraceptive use. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression with interaction terms were used to identify changes in these disparities, as well as to describe trends in desired fertility, and in types and sources of contraceptives used.\n\n\nRESULTS\nBetween 2005 and 2015, the prevalence of modern contraceptive use rose from 11% to 48%. In the regression analysis, interaction terms indicated that prevalence increased to a lesser extent among women who were wealthy, had a least a secondary education or lived in urban areas than among those who were poor, were uneducated or lived in rural areas (odds ratios, 0.5-0.7). In parallel, declines in desired fertility were greater among women with no education than among those with at least a secondary education (by 0.7 vs. 0.5 children); among the poorest than the richest women (by 1.0 vs. 0.5 children); and among rural than urban residents (by 0.9 vs. 0.4 children).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe shrinking of gaps in contraceptive use by socioeconomic status coincided with narrowing of disparities in demand for children and with improvements in family planning services, suggesting that disadvantaged populations may have especially benefited from public programs to increase contraceptive access.","PeriodicalId":46940,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/45e7519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

CONTEXT Evidence suggests that as Rwanda has strengthened its family planning program, disparities in contraceptive use by socioeconomic status have narrowed. However, the changes in these gaps, and the mechanisms that underlie them, are not well understood. METHODS Data from the 2005, 2010 and 2015 Rwanda Demographic and Health Surveys on 19,028 in-union women aged 15-49 were analyzed to examine trends in socioeconomic disparities in contraceptive use. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression with interaction terms were used to identify changes in these disparities, as well as to describe trends in desired fertility, and in types and sources of contraceptives used. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2015, the prevalence of modern contraceptive use rose from 11% to 48%. In the regression analysis, interaction terms indicated that prevalence increased to a lesser extent among women who were wealthy, had a least a secondary education or lived in urban areas than among those who were poor, were uneducated or lived in rural areas (odds ratios, 0.5-0.7). In parallel, declines in desired fertility were greater among women with no education than among those with at least a secondary education (by 0.7 vs. 0.5 children); among the poorest than the richest women (by 1.0 vs. 0.5 children); and among rural than urban residents (by 0.9 vs. 0.4 children). CONCLUSIONS The shrinking of gaps in contraceptive use by socioeconomic status coincided with narrowing of disparities in demand for children and with improvements in family planning services, suggesting that disadvantaged populations may have especially benefited from public programs to increase contraceptive access.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩小卢旺达避孕药具使用方面的贫富差距:了解潜在机制。
背景证据表明,随着卢旺达加强其计划生育方案,社会经济地位在避孕药具使用方面的差距已经缩小。然而,这些差距的变化及其背后的机制还没有得到很好的理解。方法分析2005年、2010年和2015年卢旺达人口与健康调查数据,共19028名15-49岁的孕期妇女使用避孕药具的社会经济差异趋势。使用描述性统计和带有相互作用术语的多元回归来确定这些差异的变化,以及描述期望生育率的趋势,以及所使用的避孕药具的类型和来源。结果2005年至2015年,现代避孕药具使用率从11%上升至48%。在回归分析中,相互作用项表明,富裕、至少受过中等教育或生活在城市地区的妇女的患病率增加程度低于贫穷、未受过教育或生活在农村地区的妇女(优势比,0.5-0.7)。与此同时,未受过教育的妇女的预期生育率下降幅度大于至少受过中等教育的妇女(0.7比0.5);在最贫穷的妇女中比最富有的妇女多(1.0比0.5个孩子);农村儿童比城市儿童多(0.9比0.4)。结论不同社会经济地位的避孕药具使用差距的缩小与儿童需求差距的缩小和计划生育服务的改善同时发生,这表明弱势群体可能特别受益于增加避孕药具获取的公共项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women's Perspectives on Contraceptive-Induced Amenorrhea in Burkina Faso and Uganda. Provider and Women Characteristics as Risk Factors for Postpartum Copper IUD Expulsion and Discontinuation in Nepal. Assessing Readiness to Provide Comprehensive Abortion Care in the Democratic Republic of the Congo After Passage of the Maputo Protocol. An Application of the List Experiment to Estimate Abortion Prevalence in Karachi, Pakistan. Chilean Medical and Midwifery Faculty's Views on Conscientious Objection for Abortion Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1