Validity and Reliability of theArabicVersion of Children’s Auditory Performance Scale

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Auditory and Vestibular Research Pub Date : 2022-06-25 DOI:10.18502/avr.v31i3.9863
Ghufran Ghuzlan, Samer Mohammad Mohsen
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of theArabicVersion of Children’s Auditory Performance Scale","authors":"Ghufran Ghuzlan, Samer Mohammad Mohsen","doi":"10.18502/avr.v31i3.9863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) is seen  in  a wide array of populations, including children and adults. CAPD  is characterized  by deficits  in one or more auditory abilities, causes difficulties in auditory discrimination, temporal and binaural processing although hearing thresholds are in the normal range. Children’s auditory performance scale (CHAPS) is a screening instrument. This study examined the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of children’s auditory performance scale. \nMethods: In this cross-sectional study, 50 healthy children were included. The children’s ages ranged from seven to nine years, and they passed the screening test using distortion product otoacoustic emissions before administering the scale in the translation process, the back- translation method was used, in addition to the face validity procedure. Teachers fulfilled the questionnaire in the presence of an audiologist. After two weeks, the scale was re-administrated, and then the statistical analysis was done to examine the reliability and validity of Arabic version of CHAPS (CHAPS-AR). \nResults: The internal consistency was examined with Cronbach’s α (α=0.997), for test- retest reliability, Pearson›s (r) was examined (r=0.994) and when executing the face validity, five experts agreed that the CHAPS-AR has a clear structure, syntax and it is easy to understand and use. \nConclusion: The Arabic version of CHAPS can be considered a reliable and valid screening instrument for clinical and research use \n  \nKeywords: Central auditory processing disorder; screening; children; auditory; Arabic; validity","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v31i3.9863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) is seen  in  a wide array of populations, including children and adults. CAPD  is characterized  by deficits  in one or more auditory abilities, causes difficulties in auditory discrimination, temporal and binaural processing although hearing thresholds are in the normal range. Children’s auditory performance scale (CHAPS) is a screening instrument. This study examined the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of children’s auditory performance scale. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 50 healthy children were included. The children’s ages ranged from seven to nine years, and they passed the screening test using distortion product otoacoustic emissions before administering the scale in the translation process, the back- translation method was used, in addition to the face validity procedure. Teachers fulfilled the questionnaire in the presence of an audiologist. After two weeks, the scale was re-administrated, and then the statistical analysis was done to examine the reliability and validity of Arabic version of CHAPS (CHAPS-AR). Results: The internal consistency was examined with Cronbach’s α (α=0.997), for test- retest reliability, Pearson›s (r) was examined (r=0.994) and when executing the face validity, five experts agreed that the CHAPS-AR has a clear structure, syntax and it is easy to understand and use. Conclusion: The Arabic version of CHAPS can be considered a reliable and valid screening instrument for clinical and research use   Keywords: Central auditory processing disorder; screening; children; auditory; Arabic; validity
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉伯版儿童听觉表现量表的信度和有效性
背景和目的:中枢听觉加工障碍(CAPD)在包括儿童和成人在内的广泛人群中可见。CAPD的特征是一种或多种听觉能力的缺陷,导致听觉辨别、时间和双耳处理困难,尽管听力阈值在正常范围内。儿童听觉表现量表(CHAPS)是一种筛查工具。本研究检验了阿拉伯语版儿童听觉表现量表的信度和有效性。方法:在这项横断面研究中,纳入了50名健康儿童。这些儿童的年龄从7岁到9岁不等,在使用量表之前,他们通过了畸变产物耳声发射的筛查测试。在翻译过程中,除了面部有效性程序外,还使用了反翻译方法。老师们在听力学家在场的情况下完成了问卷调查。两周后,重新使用量表,然后进行统计分析,以检验阿拉伯版CHAPS(CHAPS-AR)的可靠性和有效性。结果:内部一致性采用Cronbachα检验(α=0.997),测试-再测试信度采用Pearson›s(r)检验(r=0.994),在执行人脸有效性时,五位专家一致认为CHAPS-AR具有清晰的结构、语法,易于理解和使用。结论:阿拉伯语版CHAPS可被认为是一种可靠有效的临床和研究筛选工具关键词:中枢听觉加工障碍;筛选;儿童听的阿拉伯语有效性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Characteristics and Hearing Aid Uptake Rate of Patients Seen at the Community Hearing Clinic: A Model of Upstream Preventive Care and Earlier Intervention The Use of Homotonic Monosyllabic Words in the Persian Language for the Word-in-Noise Perception Test Development of a Smart Game Application for Auditory Training of Children with Spatial Processing Disorder in Iran: A Pilot Study Investigating the Effect of Persian Phonemic Synthesis Program in Cochlear Implant Users with Phoneme Processing Dificulities Effect of Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy on the Daily Life Aspects of Military Men with Persistent Postural- Perceptual Dizziness: A Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1