Differential impact of subsidised and nonsubsidized policies on the innovation of new energy vehicle enterprises: evidence from China

IF 1.7 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Asian Journal of Technology Innovation Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1080/19761597.2022.2044871
Shufeng Qin, Yongqing Xiong
{"title":"Differential impact of subsidised and nonsubsidized policies on the innovation of new energy vehicle enterprises: evidence from China","authors":"Shufeng Qin, Yongqing Xiong","doi":"10.1080/19761597.2022.2044871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n There are many controversies about the actual effect of China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) industry policy in promoting the innovation of NEV enterprises. This study classifies China’s NEV industry policies into two categories, subsidised policy and nonsubsidized policy, and divides the innovation behaviour of NEV enterprises into high- and low-quality innovation. We selected the data from 2010 to 2019 to analyze the impacts of the abovementioned policies on the two innovations, the differences during the various development stages of the industry, and the moderating effect of the political connections of NEV enterprises. The results demonstrated that the promoting effect of subsidised policy on innovation increased at first and then decreased, and the policy is more likely to cause enterprises to prefer low-quality innovation. The promoting effect of nonsubsidized policy on innovation gradually increases, and the policy has a greater impact on high-quality innovation. Further analysis revealed that the political connections positively moderate the influence of subsidised policy on low-quality innovation, but negatively moderate the influence of nonsubsidized policy on high-quality innovation.","PeriodicalId":45884,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Technology Innovation","volume":"31 1","pages":"260 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Technology Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2022.2044871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT There are many controversies about the actual effect of China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) industry policy in promoting the innovation of NEV enterprises. This study classifies China’s NEV industry policies into two categories, subsidised policy and nonsubsidized policy, and divides the innovation behaviour of NEV enterprises into high- and low-quality innovation. We selected the data from 2010 to 2019 to analyze the impacts of the abovementioned policies on the two innovations, the differences during the various development stages of the industry, and the moderating effect of the political connections of NEV enterprises. The results demonstrated that the promoting effect of subsidised policy on innovation increased at first and then decreased, and the policy is more likely to cause enterprises to prefer low-quality innovation. The promoting effect of nonsubsidized policy on innovation gradually increases, and the policy has a greater impact on high-quality innovation. Further analysis revealed that the political connections positively moderate the influence of subsidised policy on low-quality innovation, but negatively moderate the influence of nonsubsidized policy on high-quality innovation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补贴政策与非补贴政策对新能源汽车企业创新的差异影响——来自中国的证据
中国新能源汽车产业政策在推动新能源汽车企业创新方面的实际效果存在诸多争议。本研究将中国新能源汽车产业政策分为补贴政策和非补贴政策两类,并将新能源汽车企业的创新行为分为高质量创新和低质量创新。我们选取2010 - 2019年的数据,分析上述政策对两项创新的影响、行业不同发展阶段的差异以及新能源汽车企业政治关系的调节作用。研究结果表明:补贴政策对创新的促进作用先增大后减小,政策更容易导致企业偏好低质量的创新;非补贴政策对创新的促进作用逐渐增强,政策对高质量创新的影响更大。进一步分析发现,政治关系正向调节补贴政策对低质量创新的影响,而负向调节非补贴政策对高质量创新的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Navigating the global landscape: the role of technological fusion and transnational knowledge in shaping standard-essential patents Factors influencing small handicraft enterprises to adopt technological innovation: insights from Pakistani handicraft enterprises Civic knowledge management in Smart City Living Labs: a case study of water management in Gimhae, South Korea Unboxing the blackbox of human-centric and inclusive smart city initiatives: a theory based evaluation framework Exploring the collaborative innovation operational model of government-industry-education synergy: a case study of BYD in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1