DOES DISABILITY STATUS AFFECT MATERNAL CARE AROUND PREGNANCY? EVIDENCE FROM NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH (NSFG) 2013-2015 DATA IN UNITED STATES

Munir D. Ahmed, S. Baloch
{"title":"DOES DISABILITY STATUS AFFECT MATERNAL CARE AROUND PREGNANCY? EVIDENCE FROM NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH (NSFG) 2013-2015 DATA IN UNITED STATES","authors":"Munir D. Ahmed, S. Baloch","doi":"10.33457/ijhsrp.776111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction It is estimated that approximately 12% of the reproductive age women have some kind of disability; which is measured as self-reported difficulty in performing basic functions concerning movement, vision, hearing or cognition. Little research has been conducted on reproductive health of women with disabilities using nationally representative survey data; thus body of scientific knowledge on this subject is limited. Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of disability status (both mental and physical) among women on prenatal care and post-pregnancy care in U.S. using nationally representative National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) data. Study design It’s a retrospective, quantitative, observational study. Methods The 2013-2015 NSFG’s female respondent file contains 5699 records one for each woman interviewed whereas the pregnancy respondent file contains 9358 records each related to a pregnancy. The data about disabilities related variables was part of female respondent file therefore using unique respondent ID files were merged and logistic regression models were built using prenatal and postnatal care as dependent and disability status as main independent variable. Results Women with Medicaid were significantly less likely as compared to those with private insurance to have received prenatal care in last 12 months. Women with less than 12 years education were less likely to have received post pregnancy care as compared to those with college education. Conclusion: Although this study did not find significant effects of disability on utilization of prenatal and post-pregnancy care, further research is needed on this subject with datasets that include comprehensive information about broader spectrum of disability status of women.","PeriodicalId":32502,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.776111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction It is estimated that approximately 12% of the reproductive age women have some kind of disability; which is measured as self-reported difficulty in performing basic functions concerning movement, vision, hearing or cognition. Little research has been conducted on reproductive health of women with disabilities using nationally representative survey data; thus body of scientific knowledge on this subject is limited. Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of disability status (both mental and physical) among women on prenatal care and post-pregnancy care in U.S. using nationally representative National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) data. Study design It’s a retrospective, quantitative, observational study. Methods The 2013-2015 NSFG’s female respondent file contains 5699 records one for each woman interviewed whereas the pregnancy respondent file contains 9358 records each related to a pregnancy. The data about disabilities related variables was part of female respondent file therefore using unique respondent ID files were merged and logistic regression models were built using prenatal and postnatal care as dependent and disability status as main independent variable. Results Women with Medicaid were significantly less likely as compared to those with private insurance to have received prenatal care in last 12 months. Women with less than 12 years education were less likely to have received post pregnancy care as compared to those with college education. Conclusion: Although this study did not find significant effects of disability on utilization of prenatal and post-pregnancy care, further research is needed on this subject with datasets that include comprehensive information about broader spectrum of disability status of women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾状况是否影响孕妇孕期护理?证据来自2013-2015年美国全国家庭增长调查(nsfg)数据
据估计,大约12%的育龄妇女有某种残疾;这是通过自我报告在运动、视觉、听觉或认知等基本功能方面的困难来衡量的。很少利用具有全国代表性的调查数据对残疾妇女的生殖健康进行研究;因此,这方面的科学知识是有限的。本研究的目的是利用具有全国代表性的全国家庭成长调查(NSFG)数据,研究美国妇女的残疾状况(精神和身体)对产前护理和妊娠后护理的影响。这是一项回顾性、定量、观察性研究。方法2013-2015年NSFG女性受访者档案包含5699条记录,每位受访女性1条,妊娠受访者档案包含9358条记录,每条记录与妊娠有关。残障相关变量数据是女性被调查者档案的一部分,因此合并使用唯一的被调查者ID档案,并以产前产后护理为依赖变量,残障状态为主要自变量建立logistic回归模型。结果与有私人保险的妇女相比,有医疗补助的妇女在过去12个月内接受产前护理的可能性显着降低。与受过大学教育的女性相比,受教育程度低于12年的女性接受产后护理的可能性更小。结论:虽然本研究没有发现残疾对产前和产后护理的显著影响,但需要对这一主题进行进一步的研究,包括更广泛的妇女残疾状况的全面信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
DID THE BURNOUT LEVELS OF THE NURSES AFFECT THEIR PROFESSIONAL COMMITMENT DURING THE COVID -19 PANDEMIC PROCESS? THE HIDDEN IMPACTS OF OCCUPATIONAL STRESS ON PATIENT SAFETY CULTURE AWARENESS AND PARTICIPATION OF UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES IN CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMS NURSE-ON-NURSE VIOLENCE: EXPLORING COLLEAGUE BULLYING IN NURSING EFFECTS OF COVID-19 ANXIETY AND COVID-19 QUALITY OF LIFE ON COVID-19 BURNOUT IN PSYCHIATRIC NURSES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1