The Association of Physical Activity and Work Engagement Among Participants in an Employee Wellness Program

Victor Tringali, Charles Andrew King, R. Siebers, Megan Hall
{"title":"The Association of Physical Activity and Work Engagement Among Participants in an Employee Wellness Program","authors":"Victor Tringali, Charles Andrew King, R. Siebers, Megan Hall","doi":"10.11648/j.jhrm.20231102.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Work engagement has been linked with employee health and work performance outcomes making it an area of attention within the field of human resources management. However, work engagement among the US workforce has declined in recent years. Literature suggests physical activity may play a role in improving work engagement, which has raised interest among human resources and workplace health professionals. Employee wellness programs are uniquely situated to promote a physically active workforce. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to examine the relationship between physical activity and work engagement among employee wellness program participants at a public university. A secondary aim was to examine the relationship between strength training exercise and work engagement. We analyzed data on work engagement, and physical activity from a survey completed by 6,923 employee wellness program participants at public university. We defined respondents as physically active (PA) if their combined moderate to vigorous exercise met or exceeded 30 minutes on at least three days per week. All others were defined as inactive (IA). Respondents were defined as strength trained (ST) if they reported muscle strengthening exercise on two or more days per week, while all others were defined as untrained (UT). Work engagement score was based on responses to the three-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3). We performed two-tailed t-tests to determine differences in mean work engagement scores between the physically active (PA) and inactive (IA) groups and between the strength trained (ST) and untrained (UT) groups. Differences in work engagement scores were statistically significant (p < 0.0001), with higher scores observed in the PA group (11.987) compared to the IA group (11.025). Differences in scores between the ST group and UT group were also statistically significant (p < 0.0001), with higher scores observed in the ST group (12.132) compared to the UT group (11.446). The findings from this study support earlier research and suggest promotion of physical activity and strength training may be a potential strategy to improve work engagement. Workplace health promotion and human resources professionals should consider the information gleaned from this evaluation to help them optimize human capital and business outcomes.","PeriodicalId":31099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Resource Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20231102.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Work engagement has been linked with employee health and work performance outcomes making it an area of attention within the field of human resources management. However, work engagement among the US workforce has declined in recent years. Literature suggests physical activity may play a role in improving work engagement, which has raised interest among human resources and workplace health professionals. Employee wellness programs are uniquely situated to promote a physically active workforce. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to examine the relationship between physical activity and work engagement among employee wellness program participants at a public university. A secondary aim was to examine the relationship between strength training exercise and work engagement. We analyzed data on work engagement, and physical activity from a survey completed by 6,923 employee wellness program participants at public university. We defined respondents as physically active (PA) if their combined moderate to vigorous exercise met or exceeded 30 minutes on at least three days per week. All others were defined as inactive (IA). Respondents were defined as strength trained (ST) if they reported muscle strengthening exercise on two or more days per week, while all others were defined as untrained (UT). Work engagement score was based on responses to the three-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3). We performed two-tailed t-tests to determine differences in mean work engagement scores between the physically active (PA) and inactive (IA) groups and between the strength trained (ST) and untrained (UT) groups. Differences in work engagement scores were statistically significant (p < 0.0001), with higher scores observed in the PA group (11.987) compared to the IA group (11.025). Differences in scores between the ST group and UT group were also statistically significant (p < 0.0001), with higher scores observed in the ST group (12.132) compared to the UT group (11.446). The findings from this study support earlier research and suggest promotion of physical activity and strength training may be a potential strategy to improve work engagement. Workplace health promotion and human resources professionals should consider the information gleaned from this evaluation to help them optimize human capital and business outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
员工健康计划参与者的体力活动与工作投入的关联
工作投入与雇员健康和工作绩效结果相联系,使其成为人力资源管理领域的一个关注领域。然而,美国劳动力的工作投入近年来有所下降。文献表明,体育活动可能在提高工作投入方面发挥作用,这引起了人力资源和工作场所健康专业人士的兴趣。员工健康计划的独特定位是促进员工积极锻炼身体。因此,本研究的主要目的是考察一所公立大学员工健康计划参与者的体育活动与工作投入之间的关系。第二个目的是研究力量训练和工作投入之间的关系。我们分析了一项由6923名公立大学员工健康计划参与者完成的调查中关于工作投入和身体活动的数据。我们将受访者定义为身体活跃(PA),如果他们每周至少三天的中度到剧烈运动达到或超过30分钟。所有其他被定义为非活性(IA)。受访者被定义为力量训练(ST),如果他们报告每周有两天或更多的肌肉强化锻炼,而所有其他人被定义为未经训练(UT)。工作投入得分是基于对乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-3)的三个项目的回答。我们进行了双尾t检验,以确定体力活动组(PA)和非体力活动组(IA)以及力量训练组(ST)和未训练组(UT)之间的平均工作投入得分差异。工作投入得分差异有统计学意义(p < 0.0001), PA组(11.987)高于IA组(11.025)。ST组与UT组的得分差异也有统计学意义(p < 0.0001), ST组得分为12.132分,高于UT组(11.446分)。这项研究的结果支持了早期的研究,并表明促进体育活动和力量训练可能是提高工作投入的潜在策略。工作场所健康促进和人力资源专业人员应考虑从此评估中收集的信息,以帮助他们优化人力资本和业务成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Research on the Impact of gGreen Human Hesource Management on Employees' Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Internet Enterprises Employee Performance: The Influence of Organizational Commitment, Work-Life Balance and Technostress (Case Study of Non-PNS Employees) Understanding the Role of Structural Change Management from Employees’ Perspective: A Case Study for Hawassa Industrial Park Enhancing HR Technology Through Traceability and Auditing: Navigating Challenges and Legal Complexities for Operational Efficiency Long-Term Evaluation of a Short Training Program for the Unemployed: Exploring Administrative Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1