Constituent order in silent gesture reflects the perspective of the producer

IF 2.1 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Language Evolution Pub Date : 2021-03-20 DOI:10.1093/JOLE/LZAA010
Fiona Kirton, S. Kirby, Kenny Smith, J. Culbertson, M. Schouwstra
{"title":"Constituent order in silent gesture reflects the perspective of the producer","authors":"Fiona Kirton, S. Kirby, Kenny Smith, J. Culbertson, M. Schouwstra","doi":"10.1093/JOLE/LZAA010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Understanding the relationship between human cognition and linguistic structure is a central theme in language evolution research. Numerous studies have investigated this question using the silent gesture paradigm in which participants describe events using only gesture and no speech. Research using this paradigm has found that Agent–Patient–Action (APV) is the most commonly produced gesture order, regardless of the producer’s native language. However, studies have uncovered a range of factors that influence ordering preferences. One such factor is salience, which has been suggested as a key determiner of word order. Specifically, humans, who are typically agents, are more salient than inanimate objects, so tend to be mentioned first. In this study, we investigated the role of salience in more detail and asked whether manipulating the salience of a human agent would modulate the tendency to express humans before objects. We found, first, that APV was less common than expected based on previous literature. Secondly, salience influenced the relative ordering of the patient and action, but not the agent and patient. For events involving a non-salient agent, participants typically expressed the patient before the action and vice versa for salient agents. Thirdly, participants typically omitted non-salient agents from their descriptions. We present details of a novel computational solution that infers the orders participants would have produced had they expressed all three constituents on every trial. Our analysis showed that events involving salient agents tended to elicit AVP; those involving a non-salient agent were typically described with APV, modulated by a strong tendency to omit the agent. We argue that these findings provide evidence that the effect of salience is realized through its effect on the perspective from which a producer frames an event.","PeriodicalId":37118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/JOLE/LZAA010","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JOLE/LZAA010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between human cognition and linguistic structure is a central theme in language evolution research. Numerous studies have investigated this question using the silent gesture paradigm in which participants describe events using only gesture and no speech. Research using this paradigm has found that Agent–Patient–Action (APV) is the most commonly produced gesture order, regardless of the producer’s native language. However, studies have uncovered a range of factors that influence ordering preferences. One such factor is salience, which has been suggested as a key determiner of word order. Specifically, humans, who are typically agents, are more salient than inanimate objects, so tend to be mentioned first. In this study, we investigated the role of salience in more detail and asked whether manipulating the salience of a human agent would modulate the tendency to express humans before objects. We found, first, that APV was less common than expected based on previous literature. Secondly, salience influenced the relative ordering of the patient and action, but not the agent and patient. For events involving a non-salient agent, participants typically expressed the patient before the action and vice versa for salient agents. Thirdly, participants typically omitted non-salient agents from their descriptions. We present details of a novel computational solution that infers the orders participants would have produced had they expressed all three constituents on every trial. Our analysis showed that events involving salient agents tended to elicit AVP; those involving a non-salient agent were typically described with APV, modulated by a strong tendency to omit the agent. We argue that these findings provide evidence that the effect of salience is realized through its effect on the perspective from which a producer frames an event.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无声手势中的组成秩序反映了生产者的视角
理解人类认知与语言结构之间的关系是语言进化研究的中心主题。许多研究使用无声手势范式来调查这个问题,在无声手势范式中,参与者只使用手势而不使用言语来描述事件。使用这种范式的研究发现,无论生产者的母语如何,代理-患者-动作(APV)都是最常见的手势顺序。然而,研究发现了一系列影响订购偏好的因素。其中一个因素是显著性,它被认为是语序的关键决定因素。具体来说,人类通常是代理人,比无生命物体更突出,因此往往首先被提及。在这项研究中,我们更详细地调查了显著性的作用,并询问操纵人类主体的显著性是否会调节在物体之前表达人类的倾向。首先,我们发现APV的发病率低于先前文献的预期。其次,显著性影响患者和行动的相对顺序,但不影响代理人和患者。对于涉及非显著因素的事件,参与者通常在行动前表达患者,而显著因素则相反。第三,参与者通常会在描述中省略不突出的主体。我们介绍了一种新的计算解决方案的细节,该解决方案推断了参与者在每次试验中表达所有三种成分时会产生的顺序。我们的分析表明,涉及显著因素的事件往往会引发AVP;那些涉及非显著试剂的试剂通常用APV来描述,APV由省略试剂的强烈趋势来调节。我们认为,这些发现提供了证据,证明显著性的影响是通过其对生产者构建事件的视角的影响来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Language Evolution
Journal of Language Evolution Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Derivational morphology and suffixing bias on linguistic and nonlinguistic material Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of pitch-accent systems based on accentual class merger: a new method applied to Japanese dialects The evolution of evolutionary linguistics Evolutionary pathways of complexity in gender systems Correction to: The scientometric landscape of Evolang: A comprehensive database of the Evolang conference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1