Progression of aortic intramural hematoma with associated penetrating aortic ulcers with medical management requiring surgical management case report

Koral Shah, H. Ahmad, Jonathan E. Wilson, Mukesh Goyal, S. Dubin
{"title":"Progression of aortic intramural hematoma with associated penetrating aortic ulcers with medical management requiring surgical management case report","authors":"Koral Shah, H. Ahmad, Jonathan E. Wilson, Mukesh Goyal, S. Dubin","doi":"10.21037/JECCM-20-153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penetrating ulcers of the aorta, aortic dissections, and intramural hematomas (IMH) all fall under acute aortic syndromes (AAS) and have important similarities and differences. We present a case of an asymptomatic patient with uncontrolled hypertension who was found to have a unique combination of penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) with an associated IMH. Furthermore, the patient had PAUs located in the aortic arch, which is an uncommon since the majority are located in the descending thoracic aorta. His PAUs and IMH progressed despite medical management and subsequently required thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The treatment of IMHs and PAUs is less well known compared to the classic aortic dissection. Often, they may not be treated as an AAS or may be treated as an aortic dissection. This case report addresses this challenge clinicians face with unclear delineation of treatment between different AAS. This case demonstrates how a type B IMH, when associated with penetrating ulcers, may follow a more malignant course, and should be considered for early surgical intervention. This case illustrates the importance of understanding the distinction between the AAS and how treatment differs based on Stanford classification and risk factors of progression.","PeriodicalId":73727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/JECCM-20-153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Penetrating ulcers of the aorta, aortic dissections, and intramural hematomas (IMH) all fall under acute aortic syndromes (AAS) and have important similarities and differences. We present a case of an asymptomatic patient with uncontrolled hypertension who was found to have a unique combination of penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) with an associated IMH. Furthermore, the patient had PAUs located in the aortic arch, which is an uncommon since the majority are located in the descending thoracic aorta. His PAUs and IMH progressed despite medical management and subsequently required thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The treatment of IMHs and PAUs is less well known compared to the classic aortic dissection. Often, they may not be treated as an AAS or may be treated as an aortic dissection. This case report addresses this challenge clinicians face with unclear delineation of treatment between different AAS. This case demonstrates how a type B IMH, when associated with penetrating ulcers, may follow a more malignant course, and should be considered for early surgical intervention. This case illustrates the importance of understanding the distinction between the AAS and how treatment differs based on Stanford classification and risk factors of progression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动脉壁内血肿进展伴穿透性主动脉溃疡需手术治疗的病例报告
主动脉穿透性溃疡、主动脉夹层和壁内血肿(IMH)都属于急性主动脉综合征(AAS),并具有重要的相似性和差异性。我们报告一例无症状的高血压患者,他被发现有一个独特的穿透性主动脉溃疡(PAUs)与相关的IMH的组合。此外,患者的PAUs位于主动脉弓,这是不常见的,因为大多数位于胸降主动脉。他的PAUs和IMH进展,尽管医疗管理,随后需要胸腔血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR)。与典型的主动脉夹层相比,IMHs和PAUs的治疗方法鲜为人知。通常,它们可能不会被当作AAS或主动脉夹层来治疗。本病例报告解决了临床医生面临的这一挑战,即不同AAS之间的治疗描述不明确。本病例表明,当B型IMH伴有穿透性溃疡时,可能会发生更恶性的过程,应考虑早期手术干预。该病例说明了理解AAS之间的区别以及基于斯坦福分类和进展危险因素的治疗差异的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal management of mobile cabin hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from Shanghai, China A case series of Slow continuous ultrafiltration for COVID-19 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Treatment of respiratory syncytial virus with palivizumab in an adult liver transplant recipient: a case report Pituitary apoplexy mimicking stroke and myocardial infarction: a case report Diagnosis, management and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ICU: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1