G. Ibarra-Arzave, E. Solleiro‐Rebolledo, M. Bronnikova
{"title":"Paleosols and ancient societies: from early humans to the industrial revolution","authors":"G. Ibarra-Arzave, E. Solleiro‐Rebolledo, M. Bronnikova","doi":"10.18268/bsgm2022v74n3p021122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paleopedology, the study of soils developed on ancient landscapes (Yaalon, 1971), was born in Russia through the efforts of Boris B. Polynov (1927), but considering the previous work done by Vasilli V. Dokuchaev in 1883 (Dokuchaev, 1967) and later with the support of Constantin C. Nikiforoff (1943). The Commission on Paleopedology was established in 1965, in Denver, USA, by Dan Yaalon and Hans van Baren (Retallack, 2013) during the 7th Congress of the International Association for Quaternary Research (INQUA) and later, in 1968, the Commission was affiliated to the International Union of Soil Science (IUSS). After the Denver conference, the Commission published a volume with research papers focused on the recognition and classification of paleosols, methods of dating, and soil stratigraphy (Yaalon, 1971). This volume was the beginning of an extensive series of the Commission publications in different special issues of international and national scientific media. Two of these collections were published in open-access Mexican geological journals: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas v. 20 no. 3 (2003) and v. 21 no. 1 (2004), and Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, v. 64 no. 1 and 64 no. 2 (2012). The current issue is a continuation of this series. There are two concepts necessary for understanding paleosols. The first is the use of the uniformitarian principle, which suggests that past geologic processes are similar to those acting today on the Earth’s surface. In other words, the basis of modern soil geography and soil genesis is used as directly analogous to reconstruct ancient environments and landscapes. This approach is more precise when applied to Quaternary paleosols and more limited to pre-Cambrian or Paleozoic paleosols, as the environmental conditions under which they were formed are pretty different from the modern ones (Retallack, 2001). The second concept is “soil memory” (Targulian and Goriachkin, 2004), related to a set of properties that can remember ancient environmental conditions. These properties result from pedogenetic processes and soil-forming factors and are time-resistant to environmental changes remaining stable during extended periods (Targulian and Goriachkin, 2004). In recent years, paleopedology has extended its applications to reconstruct past climates, establish variations in the atmospheric composition, trace the ecosystem evolution, and identify geomorphological changes (e.g., Cerling, 1991; Retallack, 1998, 2009; Goudi, 1990; Klinge et al., 2022). Some efforts have also been made to develop models to quantify pedogenetic trends associated with environmental change (e.g., Yaalon, 1975; Sheldon and Tabor, 2009). An essential application of paleopedology has been devoted to solving archaeological problems, as soils can be considered repositories of human activities: agriculture, forestry, material for construction or ceramic production, dwelling and householding (Holliday, 2009; Costa et al., 2021; Yalçın et al., 2021). The impact of past anthropogenic activities has been recorded in the soil memory through time: since the first hunter and gatherers groups to the industrial societies. However, the relationship between humans and their environment (and vice versa) is complex and demands the application of different methodologies and the study of in-site and off-site approaches (Butzer, 2008), which integrates the information directly recovered in the archaeological excavation and that from the surrounding areas. In this sense, the paleosol-archaeological investigation has a more solid interpretation. In June 2021, the Paleopedology Commission of the IUSS, the Paleopedology Working Group of the INQUA, and the Institute of Geology of the UNAM organized a three-day online meeting with scientific sessions. The meeting topics related to the link between paleosols, the history of human interactions, and the environment. This special issue was launched as a result of this meeting. The articles included here aim to improve our understanding of the materials used for ancient constructions also past human interactions with the environment.","PeriodicalId":48849,"journal":{"name":"Boletin De La Sociedad Geologica Mexicana","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin De La Sociedad Geologica Mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18268/bsgm2022v74n3p021122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Paleopedology, the study of soils developed on ancient landscapes (Yaalon, 1971), was born in Russia through the efforts of Boris B. Polynov (1927), but considering the previous work done by Vasilli V. Dokuchaev in 1883 (Dokuchaev, 1967) and later with the support of Constantin C. Nikiforoff (1943). The Commission on Paleopedology was established in 1965, in Denver, USA, by Dan Yaalon and Hans van Baren (Retallack, 2013) during the 7th Congress of the International Association for Quaternary Research (INQUA) and later, in 1968, the Commission was affiliated to the International Union of Soil Science (IUSS). After the Denver conference, the Commission published a volume with research papers focused on the recognition and classification of paleosols, methods of dating, and soil stratigraphy (Yaalon, 1971). This volume was the beginning of an extensive series of the Commission publications in different special issues of international and national scientific media. Two of these collections were published in open-access Mexican geological journals: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas v. 20 no. 3 (2003) and v. 21 no. 1 (2004), and Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, v. 64 no. 1 and 64 no. 2 (2012). The current issue is a continuation of this series. There are two concepts necessary for understanding paleosols. The first is the use of the uniformitarian principle, which suggests that past geologic processes are similar to those acting today on the Earth’s surface. In other words, the basis of modern soil geography and soil genesis is used as directly analogous to reconstruct ancient environments and landscapes. This approach is more precise when applied to Quaternary paleosols and more limited to pre-Cambrian or Paleozoic paleosols, as the environmental conditions under which they were formed are pretty different from the modern ones (Retallack, 2001). The second concept is “soil memory” (Targulian and Goriachkin, 2004), related to a set of properties that can remember ancient environmental conditions. These properties result from pedogenetic processes and soil-forming factors and are time-resistant to environmental changes remaining stable during extended periods (Targulian and Goriachkin, 2004). In recent years, paleopedology has extended its applications to reconstruct past climates, establish variations in the atmospheric composition, trace the ecosystem evolution, and identify geomorphological changes (e.g., Cerling, 1991; Retallack, 1998, 2009; Goudi, 1990; Klinge et al., 2022). Some efforts have also been made to develop models to quantify pedogenetic trends associated with environmental change (e.g., Yaalon, 1975; Sheldon and Tabor, 2009). An essential application of paleopedology has been devoted to solving archaeological problems, as soils can be considered repositories of human activities: agriculture, forestry, material for construction or ceramic production, dwelling and householding (Holliday, 2009; Costa et al., 2021; Yalçın et al., 2021). The impact of past anthropogenic activities has been recorded in the soil memory through time: since the first hunter and gatherers groups to the industrial societies. However, the relationship between humans and their environment (and vice versa) is complex and demands the application of different methodologies and the study of in-site and off-site approaches (Butzer, 2008), which integrates the information directly recovered in the archaeological excavation and that from the surrounding areas. In this sense, the paleosol-archaeological investigation has a more solid interpretation. In June 2021, the Paleopedology Commission of the IUSS, the Paleopedology Working Group of the INQUA, and the Institute of Geology of the UNAM organized a three-day online meeting with scientific sessions. The meeting topics related to the link between paleosols, the history of human interactions, and the environment. This special issue was launched as a result of this meeting. The articles included here aim to improve our understanding of the materials used for ancient constructions also past human interactions with the environment.
古土壤学是研究在古代景观上发展起来的土壤(Yaalon, 1971),在Boris B. Polynov(1927)的努力下诞生于俄罗斯,但考虑到Vasilli V. Dokuchaev在1883年(Dokuchaev, 1967)和后来在Constantin C. Nikiforoff(1943)的支持下所做的工作。1965年,Dan Yaalon和Hans van Baren (Retallack, 2013)在第七届国际第四纪研究协会(INQUA)大会期间,在美国丹佛成立了古生物学委员会。1968年,该委员会隶属于国际土壤科学联合会(IUSS)。丹佛会议之后,委员会出版了一卷研究论文,重点是古土壤的识别和分类、年代测定方法和土壤地层学(Yaalon, 1971)。本卷是委员会在国际和国家科学媒体的不同特刊上广泛出版的一系列出版物的开始。其中两组发表在开放获取的墨西哥地质期刊上:《墨西哥科学研究》Geológicas第20期。第3(2003)号和第21号。1(2004年)和Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, v. 64 no. 1。1和64不。2(2012)。本期杂志是本系列的续篇。理解古土壤有两个必要的概念。第一个是均变说原理的应用,该原理认为过去的地质过程与今天在地球表面发生的地质过程相似。换句话说,现代土壤地理学和土壤成因的基础被用作重建古代环境和景观的直接类比。这种方法应用于第四纪古土壤时更为精确,但更局限于前寒武纪或古生代古土壤,因为它们形成的环境条件与现代的环境条件有很大的不同(Retallack, 2001)。第二个概念是“土壤记忆”(Targulian and Goriachkin, 2004),与一系列能够记住古代环境条件的属性有关。这些特性是由成土过程和土壤形成因素造成的,对环境变化具有时间抗性,在较长时间内保持稳定(Targulian和Goriachkin, 2004)。近年来,古土壤学在重建过去气候、确定大气成分变化、追踪生态系统演化和识别地貌变化等方面的应用得到了扩展(例如,Cerling, 1991;Retallack, 1998,2009;Goudi, 1990;Klinge et al., 2022)。还作出了一些努力来发展模式,以量化与环境变化有关的成土趋势(例如,亚阿隆,1975年;Sheldon and Tabor, 2009)。古土壤学的一个基本应用一直致力于解决考古问题,因为土壤可以被认为是人类活动的储存库:农业、林业、建筑或陶瓷生产材料、住宅和家庭(Holliday, 2009;Costa等人,2021;Yalçın et al., 2021)。过去人类活动的影响一直被记录在土壤记忆中,从第一个狩猎和采集群体到工业社会。然而,人与环境之间的关系(反之亦然)是复杂的,需要应用不同的方法,研究现场和场外的方法(Butzer, 2008),将考古发掘中直接获得的信息与周围地区的信息相结合。从这个意义上说,古土壤考古调查有了更可靠的解释。2021年6月,美国科学院古古生物学委员会、美国国家科学研究委员会古古生物学工作组和墨西哥国立交通大学地质研究所组织了为期三天的在线会议,并举行了科学会议。会议主题涉及古土壤、人类相互作用的历史和环境之间的联系。这期特刊就是这次会议的结果。这里收录的文章旨在提高我们对古代建筑材料的理解,以及过去人类与环境的相互作用。
期刊介绍:
The Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana is a completely free-access electronic journal published semi-annually that publishes papers and technical notes with its main objective to contribute to an understanding of the geology of Mexico, of its neighbor areas, and of geologically similar areas anywhere on Earth’s crust. Geology has no boundaries so we may publish papers on any area of knowledge that is interesting to our readers.
We also favor the publication of papers on relatively unfamiliar subjects and objectives in mainstream journals, e.g., papers devoted to new methodologies or their improvement, and areas of knowledge that in the past had relatively little attention paid them in Mexican journals, such as urban geology, water management, environmental geology, and ore deposits, among others. Mexico is a land of volcanos, earthquakes, vast resources in minerals and petroleum, and a shortage of water. Consequently, these topics should certainly be of major interest to our readers, our Society, and society in general. Furthermore, the Boletín has been published since 1904; that makes it one of the oldest scientific journals currently active in Mexico and, most notably, its entire contents, from the first issue on, are available online.