Clinical Outcome Assessment following Open Reduction and Instrumented Posterior Interbody Fusion of Adult Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Essam Youssef, A. Rizk, Mohamed Yahia
{"title":"Clinical Outcome Assessment following Open Reduction and Instrumented Posterior Interbody Fusion of Adult Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis","authors":"Essam Youssef, A. Rizk, Mohamed Yahia","doi":"10.21608/ESJ.2021.55579.1161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Data: Posterior lumbar decompression combined with instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is the gold standard management of adult spondylolisthesis. Complete anatomic surgical reduction of slippage, although controversial, is associated with encouraging results. \nPurpose: This study aims to assess the clinical outcome of complete open surgical reduction and instrumented PLIF in adult single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis. \nStudy design: Retrospective clinical case study. \nPatients and Methods: Retrospective review of standing data and radiographs of adult patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis (regardless of the aetiology) from January 2018 to January 2020. All patients have undergone posterior lumbar decompression, pedicle screw instrumentation, complete reduction of the slippage, and PLIF. All patients were assessed at six and 12 months postoperatively by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Odom criteria. \nResults: A total of 118 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no neurologic deterioration in any of the patients postoperatively. There was a significant change in VAS, ODI, and Odom’s criteria at six and 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean value for VAS and ODI were 0.61 ± 1.03 and 4.52 ± 7.02, respectively, at the last follow-up. There was a significant change in Odom’s criteria as 61.9% of patients had excellent outcomes at the last follow-up. \nConclusion: Complete surgical reduction of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis combined with instrumented PLIF offers adequate neural element decompression and satisfactory clinical outcome. (2020ESJ227)","PeriodicalId":11610,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ESJ.2021.55579.1161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Data: Posterior lumbar decompression combined with instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is the gold standard management of adult spondylolisthesis. Complete anatomic surgical reduction of slippage, although controversial, is associated with encouraging results. Purpose: This study aims to assess the clinical outcome of complete open surgical reduction and instrumented PLIF in adult single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis. Study design: Retrospective clinical case study. Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of standing data and radiographs of adult patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis (regardless of the aetiology) from January 2018 to January 2020. All patients have undergone posterior lumbar decompression, pedicle screw instrumentation, complete reduction of the slippage, and PLIF. All patients were assessed at six and 12 months postoperatively by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Odom criteria. Results: A total of 118 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no neurologic deterioration in any of the patients postoperatively. There was a significant change in VAS, ODI, and Odom’s criteria at six and 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean value for VAS and ODI were 0.61 ± 1.03 and 4.52 ± 7.02, respectively, at the last follow-up. There was a significant change in Odom’s criteria as 61.9% of patients had excellent outcomes at the last follow-up. Conclusion: Complete surgical reduction of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis combined with instrumented PLIF offers adequate neural element decompression and satisfactory clinical outcome. (2020ESJ227)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人单节段腰椎滑脱开放性复位和固定化后路椎间融合术的临床疗效评估
背景资料:后腰椎减压联合椎间融合术(PLIF)是治疗成人脊椎滑脱的金标准。完全解剖手术减少滑脱,尽管有争议,但与令人鼓舞的结果有关。目的:本研究旨在评估完全开放手术复位和器械PLIF治疗成人单节段腰椎滑脱的临床效果。研究设计:回顾性临床病例研究。患者和方法:回顾性回顾2018年1月至2020年1月成年单级腰椎滑脱患者(无论病因如何)的站立数据和X线照片。所有患者均接受了腰椎后路减压、椎弓根螺钉内固定、滑动完全复位和PLIF。所有患者在术后6个月和12个月通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)、奥斯韦斯特里残疾指数(ODI)和Odom标准进行评估。结果:共有118名患者符合入选标准。所有患者术后均未出现神经功能恶化。术后6个月和12个月VAS、ODI和Odom评分标准有显著变化(p < 0.001)。VAS和ODI的平均值为0.61 ± 1.03和4.52 ± 7.02。Odom的标准发生了显著变化,61.9%的患者在最后一次随访中取得了良好的结果。结论:单节段腰椎滑脱症完全手术复位联合PLIF器械可提供充分的神经元件减压,临床效果满意。(2020ESJ227)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Extremity Peripheral Nerve Injuries: Is There Any Role of Specialized Field Hospital in the Management of Low-Velocity Penetrating Peripheral Nerve Injuries? Short-Segment Posterior Fixation with Index Level Screws versus Long-Segment Posterior Fixation in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Awake Spine Surgery: Fad or Future? Pedicle Screw/Sublaminar Hook Fixation versus Pedicle Screw/Infraspinous Wire Fixation for Spondylolysis Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study with MSCT Assessment Absence of the Musculocutaneous Nerve While Performing Nerve Transfer Surgery in a Patient with Brachial Plexus Injury, Rare Variant, and Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1