{"title":"Whitewashing of Social Work History","authors":"Kelechi C. Wright, Kortney Carr, Becci A. Akkin","doi":"10.18060/23946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Severe racial inequity has characterized the incorporation of ethnic minorities’ contributions to U.S. history and advancements (Sandoval et al., 2016). These disparities are inextricably connected to White Supremacist ideologies and practices, and are perpetuated in higher education through textbooks, pedagogy, and research. Social work, like many disciplines, teaches about its early roots with a whitewashed historical lens. Indeed, review of the social work literature reveals the scarcity of attributions to Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC). Without a more racially diverse perspective on social work’s history, social work scholars promote and sustain White Supremacy. The implications of this are crucial since social work education is predominantly populated by privileged White students who adopt this mentality, unaware of Black, Brown, Latino, Asian, Native or Other ethnic “Jane Addams” who have massively promoted the social welfare of communities for decades without historical recognition or the privileged positions of Addams and Richmond. Historical distortions also potentially discourage BIPOC social work students’ self-efficacy and future efforts to contribute and excel in the discipline. To properly address this issue, social work history must be refaced with a more equitable and just lens. This review seeks to address the gap in the literature pertaining to the need for a greater integration and infusion of racially diverse social work historical contributions in several ways. Recommendations will be made for future research in this area to dismantle racist perspectives in social work history, and strategies will be offered to help social work educators and researchers address this critical issue.","PeriodicalId":7430,"journal":{"name":"Advances in social work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/23946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
Abstract
Severe racial inequity has characterized the incorporation of ethnic minorities’ contributions to U.S. history and advancements (Sandoval et al., 2016). These disparities are inextricably connected to White Supremacist ideologies and practices, and are perpetuated in higher education through textbooks, pedagogy, and research. Social work, like many disciplines, teaches about its early roots with a whitewashed historical lens. Indeed, review of the social work literature reveals the scarcity of attributions to Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC). Without a more racially diverse perspective on social work’s history, social work scholars promote and sustain White Supremacy. The implications of this are crucial since social work education is predominantly populated by privileged White students who adopt this mentality, unaware of Black, Brown, Latino, Asian, Native or Other ethnic “Jane Addams” who have massively promoted the social welfare of communities for decades without historical recognition or the privileged positions of Addams and Richmond. Historical distortions also potentially discourage BIPOC social work students’ self-efficacy and future efforts to contribute and excel in the discipline. To properly address this issue, social work history must be refaced with a more equitable and just lens. This review seeks to address the gap in the literature pertaining to the need for a greater integration and infusion of racially diverse social work historical contributions in several ways. Recommendations will be made for future research in this area to dismantle racist perspectives in social work history, and strategies will be offered to help social work educators and researchers address this critical issue.
严重的种族不平等体现了少数民族对美国历史和进步的贡献(Sandoval et al., 2016)。这些差异与白人至上主义的意识形态和做法有着千丝万缕的联系,并通过教科书、教学法和研究在高等教育中得以延续。像许多学科一样,社会工作用粉饰过的历史镜头来讲述它的早期根源。事实上,对社会工作文献的回顾揭示了黑人、土著和其他有色人种(BIPOC)的稀缺归因。如果没有更多元的种族视角来看待社会工作的历史,社会工作学者就会促进和维持白人至上主义。这一点的含义是至关重要的,因为社会工作教育主要由特权白人学生组成,他们采用这种心态,不知道黑人、棕色人种、拉丁裔、亚裔、土著或其他种族的“简·亚当斯”,他们几十年来在没有历史认可或亚当斯和里士满的特权地位的情况下,大规模地促进了社区的社会福利。历史的扭曲也潜在地阻碍了BIPOC社会工作学生的自我效能感和未来在该学科中做出贡献和出类拔萃的努力。要正确解决这一问题,必须以更公平和公正的视角重新审视社会工作的历史。这篇综述试图从几个方面解决文献中关于需要更大程度地整合和注入种族多样化的社会工作历史贡献的差距。本文将为未来在这一领域的研究提出建议,以消除社会工作历史中的种族主义观点,并提供策略来帮助社会工作教育者和研究人员解决这一关键问题。