What are the Plant Reproductive Consequences of Losing a Floral Larcenist?

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Pollination Ecology Pub Date : 2022-08-03 DOI:10.26786/1920-7603(2022)663
Trevor Ledbetter, S. Richman, Rebecca E. Irwin, J. Bronstein
{"title":"What are the Plant Reproductive Consequences of Losing a Floral Larcenist?","authors":"Trevor Ledbetter, S. Richman, Rebecca E. Irwin, J. Bronstein","doi":"10.26786/1920-7603(2022)663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pollinator declines worldwide are detrimental for plants. Given the negative effects that antagonisitc visitors, including nectar robbers, can sometimes inflict, might declines in their populations instead confer benefits? During the 1970s, reproductive biology of the Colorado columbine, Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae), was documented near Gothic, Colorado. At that time, Bombus occidentalis, the Western Bumble bee, was one of its many pollinators, but more commonly acted as its only known nectar robber. Bombus occidentalis abundance has declined precipitously throughout the Western USA since the 1970s. In 2016, we documented floral visitors at sites near those used in the original survey. We then experimentally quantified the effects of nectar robbing, allowing us to estimate the reproductive consequences of losing B. occidentalis. We also quantified the potential pollination services of muscid flies (Muscidae, Diptera). The floral visitor community was dramatically different in 2016 compared to the 1970s. Bombus occidentalis was infrequently observed, and nectar robbing was negligible. Our experiments suggested that a high level of nectar robbing would lead to significantly reduced fruit set, although not seeds per fruit. Fly visits to flowers were dramatically higher in 2016 compared to the 1970s. In the absence of bumble bees, muscid flies significantly reduced fruit set below the self-pollination rate. The negative effect of the increase in these flies likely outweighed any positive effects A. caerulea experienced from the absence of its nectar robber. Although the field observations were conducted in a single year, when interpreted in combination with our manipulative experiments, they suggest how A. caerulea may fare in a changing visitation landscape.","PeriodicalId":30194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2022)663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pollinator declines worldwide are detrimental for plants. Given the negative effects that antagonisitc visitors, including nectar robbers, can sometimes inflict, might declines in their populations instead confer benefits? During the 1970s, reproductive biology of the Colorado columbine, Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae), was documented near Gothic, Colorado. At that time, Bombus occidentalis, the Western Bumble bee, was one of its many pollinators, but more commonly acted as its only known nectar robber. Bombus occidentalis abundance has declined precipitously throughout the Western USA since the 1970s. In 2016, we documented floral visitors at sites near those used in the original survey. We then experimentally quantified the effects of nectar robbing, allowing us to estimate the reproductive consequences of losing B. occidentalis. We also quantified the potential pollination services of muscid flies (Muscidae, Diptera). The floral visitor community was dramatically different in 2016 compared to the 1970s. Bombus occidentalis was infrequently observed, and nectar robbing was negligible. Our experiments suggested that a high level of nectar robbing would lead to significantly reduced fruit set, although not seeds per fruit. Fly visits to flowers were dramatically higher in 2016 compared to the 1970s. In the absence of bumble bees, muscid flies significantly reduced fruit set below the self-pollination rate. The negative effect of the increase in these flies likely outweighed any positive effects A. caerulea experienced from the absence of its nectar robber. Although the field observations were conducted in a single year, when interpreted in combination with our manipulative experiments, they suggest how A. caerulea may fare in a changing visitation landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失去一个花盗的植物繁殖后果是什么?
全世界花粉数量的减少对植物有害。考虑到包括花蜜劫匪在内的敌对游客有时可能造成的负面影响,他们的数量减少会带来好处吗?在20世纪70年代,科罗拉多哥伦比亚的生殖生物学,即金龟子科(Aquilegia caerulea),在科罗拉多州哥德附近被记录在案。当时,西方大黄蜂Bombus occidentalis是其众多传粉昆虫之一,但更常见的是充当其唯一已知的花蜜强盗。自20世纪70年代以来,美国西部的西美人数量急剧下降。2016年,我们记录了在原始调查中使用的地点附近的花卉访客。然后,我们通过实验量化了花蜜掠夺的影响,使我们能够估计失去西方B.occidentalis的繁殖后果。我们还量化了蝇类(蝇科,直翅目)的潜在授粉服务。与20世纪70年代相比,2016年的花卉游客群体大不相同。西美人很少被观察到,花蜜的掠夺也可以忽略不计。我们的实验表明,高水平的花蜜掠夺会导致坐果显著减少,尽管不是每个果实的种子。与20世纪70年代相比,2016年对鲜花的飞行访问量显著增加。在没有大黄蜂的情况下,蝇类显著降低了结实率,使其低于自花授粉率。这些苍蝇数量增加的负面影响可能超过了蓝斑蝶在没有花蜜强盗的情况下所经历的任何积极影响。尽管实地观察是在一年内进行的,但当结合我们的操纵实验进行解释时,它们表明了银合欢在不断变化的访问景观中可能会如何发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Journal of Pollination Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pollinator effectiveness and pollination dependency of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) in Swedish hemi-boreal forests Fecal sampling protocol to assess bumble bee health in conservation research Species-specific differences in bumblebee worker body size between different elevations: Implications for pollinator community structure under climate change Professor Sue Nicolson 1950-2023: Sweet solutions: pollinators and their physiology Flower-visiting lizards as key ecological actors for an endemic and critically endangered plant in the Canary Islands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1