{"title":"Actualizing interculturality through finding de-centred threads","authors":"Yih Ren","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2022.2071910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education and Intercultural Identity and Making Sense of The Intercultural both deploy interviews, oral narratives, and ethnographic research to illustrate the critical role of intercultural discourse in the transformation of global normativity and hegemony and the development of a global orientation, critical consciousness, and intercultural understanding. Both books recognize dialogue as an indispensable tool to develop relationships of collective thinking and action within our society. To Barthes et al. (2012), dialogue is identified as the ‘zero degree of language.’ At this degree, communication becomes a transformative act emancipated from ideology. Likewise, to Freire et al. (2020), dialogue becomes a pedagogical condition for new yet critical consciousness to emerge and challenge constricting worldviews, knowledge production, and boundaries to human existence. Looking around the world, conflicts, fear, and coercion dominate headlines raising debates over refugees and nationalism in the Western societies that have become even more charged during the Covid era of isolation and polarization. With increasing conflict, migration and globalization bringing innumerable changes to social, cultural, and political environments, we need a proper language to describe, conceptualize, and practice multiculturism, intercultural communication, and diversity (Beck 2011). This book review starts with an overview of each book and then discusses ideas shared by both books and thoughts and visions that contrast or complement each other. Lastly, the review article concludes with questions for readers to further think about decolonizing normativity and embodying the alternative ways of knowing and being.","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2022.2071910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Education and Intercultural Identity and Making Sense of The Intercultural both deploy interviews, oral narratives, and ethnographic research to illustrate the critical role of intercultural discourse in the transformation of global normativity and hegemony and the development of a global orientation, critical consciousness, and intercultural understanding. Both books recognize dialogue as an indispensable tool to develop relationships of collective thinking and action within our society. To Barthes et al. (2012), dialogue is identified as the ‘zero degree of language.’ At this degree, communication becomes a transformative act emancipated from ideology. Likewise, to Freire et al. (2020), dialogue becomes a pedagogical condition for new yet critical consciousness to emerge and challenge constricting worldviews, knowledge production, and boundaries to human existence. Looking around the world, conflicts, fear, and coercion dominate headlines raising debates over refugees and nationalism in the Western societies that have become even more charged during the Covid era of isolation and polarization. With increasing conflict, migration and globalization bringing innumerable changes to social, cultural, and political environments, we need a proper language to describe, conceptualize, and practice multiculturism, intercultural communication, and diversity (Beck 2011). This book review starts with an overview of each book and then discusses ideas shared by both books and thoughts and visions that contrast or complement each other. Lastly, the review article concludes with questions for readers to further think about decolonizing normativity and embodying the alternative ways of knowing and being.
《教育与跨文化认同》和《理解跨文化》都运用访谈、口头叙述和民族志研究来说明跨文化话语在全球规范和霸权的转变以及全球取向、批判意识和跨文化理解的发展中的关键作用。两本书都承认对话是在我们的社会中发展集体思考和行动关系的不可或缺的工具。对Barthes et al.(2012)来说,对话被认为是“零程度的语言”。在这个程度上,交流成为一种从意识形态中解放出来的变革行为。同样,对于Freire等人(2020)来说,对话成为一种新的批判性意识出现的教学条件,并挑战狭隘的世界观、知识生产和人类存在的界限。放眼世界,冲突、恐惧和胁迫占据了新闻头条,引发了西方社会关于难民和民族主义的争论,在新冠疫情时期,西方社会的孤立和两极分化变得更加激烈。随着冲突、移民和全球化的增加,给社会、文化和政治环境带来了无数的变化,我们需要一种合适的语言来描述、概念化和实践多元文化主义、跨文化交流和多样性(Beck 2011)。这篇书评从每本书的概述开始,然后讨论两本书共享的观点,以及相互对照或互补的思想和愿景。最后,这篇评论文章提出了一些问题,供读者进一步思考去殖民化的规范性和体现认识和存在的替代方式。