Advantage of oncological outcome of robotic-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in stage I pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC)

Jingfeng Li, Shulin Zhao, Jiabin Jin, Yusheng Shi, Yuanchi Weng, Mengmin Chen, Haoda Chen, Zhiwei Xu, Xiaxing Deng, Baiyong Shen, C. Peng
{"title":"Advantage of oncological outcome of robotic-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in stage I pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC)","authors":"Jingfeng Li, Shulin Zhao, Jiabin Jin, Yusheng Shi, Yuanchi Weng, Mengmin Chen, Haoda Chen, Zhiwei Xu, Xiaxing Deng, Baiyong Shen, C. Peng","doi":"10.1097/JP9.0000000000000102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Robotic-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been widely performed in the treatment of pancreatic tumors. The oncologic outcome in the early stage of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) operated by RPD has not been evaluated. Methods: Clinical data of pathology confirmed stage I PDAC from January 2015 to December 2020 in Ruijin hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine was collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) group and the RPD group. Clinicopathological data and prognosis data were compared and analyzed. Results: A total of 426 patients were enrolled in this study, including 342 patients in the OPD group and 84 patients in the RPD group. The baseline characteristics of both groups were equivalent. Incidence of R1 resection was significantly lower in RPD group (3 [3.6%] vs 40 [11.7%], P = .044). RPD group was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (DFS: Haszard Ratio [HR]: 0.681, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.491–0.945, P = .022; OS: HR: 0.667, 95% CI: 0.478–0.932, P = .017). T2 stage was associated with poor DFS and OS (DFS: HR: 1.471, 95% CI: 1.092–1.981, P = .011; OS: HR: 1.616, 95% CI: 1.209–2.160, P = .035). R1 resection was associated with poor OS (HR: 1.483, 95% CI: 1.028–2.140, P = .035) while adjuvant therapy was associated with better OS (HR: 0.589, 95% CI: 0.452–0.766, P < .001). Kaplan–Meier estimate showed significantly longer DFS and OS in RPD group (DFS: P = .004; OS: P = .009). Conclusion: For stage I PDAC patients, RPD surgery achieved higher R0 resection rates and better DFS and OS. T1 stage was associated with better DFS. R0 resection and adjuvant therapy were the accesses to better OS.","PeriodicalId":92925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pancreatology","volume":"5 1","pages":"125 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JP9.0000000000000102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been widely performed in the treatment of pancreatic tumors. The oncologic outcome in the early stage of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) operated by RPD has not been evaluated. Methods: Clinical data of pathology confirmed stage I PDAC from January 2015 to December 2020 in Ruijin hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine was collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) group and the RPD group. Clinicopathological data and prognosis data were compared and analyzed. Results: A total of 426 patients were enrolled in this study, including 342 patients in the OPD group and 84 patients in the RPD group. The baseline characteristics of both groups were equivalent. Incidence of R1 resection was significantly lower in RPD group (3 [3.6%] vs 40 [11.7%], P = .044). RPD group was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (DFS: Haszard Ratio [HR]: 0.681, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.491–0.945, P = .022; OS: HR: 0.667, 95% CI: 0.478–0.932, P = .017). T2 stage was associated with poor DFS and OS (DFS: HR: 1.471, 95% CI: 1.092–1.981, P = .011; OS: HR: 1.616, 95% CI: 1.209–2.160, P = .035). R1 resection was associated with poor OS (HR: 1.483, 95% CI: 1.028–2.140, P = .035) while adjuvant therapy was associated with better OS (HR: 0.589, 95% CI: 0.452–0.766, P < .001). Kaplan–Meier estimate showed significantly longer DFS and OS in RPD group (DFS: P = .004; OS: P = .009). Conclusion: For stage I PDAC patients, RPD surgery achieved higher R0 resection rates and better DFS and OS. T1 stage was associated with better DFS. R0 resection and adjuvant therapy were the accesses to better OS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)在I期胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中的肿瘤学结果优势
背景:机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)已广泛应用于胰腺肿瘤的治疗。早期胰管腺癌(PDAC)经RPD手术的肿瘤预后尚未得到评价。方法:收集上海交通大学医学院瑞金医院2015年1月至2020年12月病理证实的I期PDAC患者的临床资料并进行回顾性分析。患者分为开放式胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)组和RPD组。比较分析临床病理资料和预后资料。结果:共纳入426例患者,其中OPD组342例,RPD组84例。两组的基线特征相同。RPD组R1切除发生率显著低于RPD组(3例[3.6%]vs 40例[11.7%],P = 0.044)。RPD组无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)较好(DFS:风险比[HR]: 0.681, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.491-0.945, P = 0.022;Os: hr: 0.667, 95% ci: 0.478-0.932, p = 0.017)。T2期与较差的DFS和OS相关(DFS: HR: 1.471, 95% CI: 1.092 ~ 1.981, P = 0.011;Os: hr: 1.616, 95% ci: 1.209-2.160, p = 0.035)。R1切除术与较差的OS相关(HR: 1.483, 95% CI: 1.028-2.140, P = 0.035),而辅助治疗与较好的OS相关(HR: 0.589, 95% CI: 0.452-0.766, P < 0.001)。Kaplan-Meier估计显示,RPD组的DFS和OS显著延长(DFS: P = 0.004;Os: p = 0.009)。结论:对于I期PDAC患者,RPD手术获得更高的R0切除率和更好的DFS和OS。T1期与较好的DFS相关。R0切除和辅助治疗是获得较好OS的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reappraisal of the Parenchyma-Sparing Resections for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Chinese High-volume Center Experience Phase angle is an indicator of GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition in patients undergoing major pancreatic and biliary surgery: a cross-sectional study Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Urinastatin combined with octreotide versus sole octreotide in severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis Integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing to construct a CD8 + T cell-related immune gene signature in pancreatic cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1