“I would have to evaluate their objections”: Privacy tensions between smart home device owners and incidental users

Camille Cobb, Sruti Bhagavatula, K. Garrett, Alison Hoffman, Varun Rao, Lujo Bauer
{"title":"“I would have to evaluate their objections”: Privacy tensions between smart home device owners and incidental users","authors":"Camille Cobb, Sruti Bhagavatula, K. Garrett, Alison Hoffman, Varun Rao, Lujo Bauer","doi":"10.2478/popets-2021-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent research and articles in popular press have raised concerns about the privacy risks that smart home devices can create for incidental users—people who encounter smart home devices that are owned, controlled, and configured by someone else. In this work, we present the results of a user-centered investigation that explores incidental users’ experiences and the tensions that arise between device owners and incidental users. We conducted five focus group sessions through which we identified specific contexts in which someone might encounter other people’s smart home devices and the main concerns device owners and incidental users have in such situations. We used these findings to inform the design of a survey instrument, which we deployed to a demographically representative sample of 386 adults in the United States. Through this survey, we can better understand which contexts and concerns are most bothersome and how often device owners are willing to accommodate incidental users’ privacy preferences. We found some surprising trends in terms of what people are most worried about and what actions they are willing to take. For example, while participants who did not own devices themselves were often uncomfortable imagining them in their own homes, they were not as concerned about being affected by such devices in homes that they entered as part of their jobs. Participants showed interest in privacy solutions that might have a technical implementation component, but also frequently envisioned an open dialogue between incidental users and device owners to negotiate privacy accommodations.","PeriodicalId":74556,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium","volume":"2021 1","pages":"54 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2021-0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Abstract Recent research and articles in popular press have raised concerns about the privacy risks that smart home devices can create for incidental users—people who encounter smart home devices that are owned, controlled, and configured by someone else. In this work, we present the results of a user-centered investigation that explores incidental users’ experiences and the tensions that arise between device owners and incidental users. We conducted five focus group sessions through which we identified specific contexts in which someone might encounter other people’s smart home devices and the main concerns device owners and incidental users have in such situations. We used these findings to inform the design of a survey instrument, which we deployed to a demographically representative sample of 386 adults in the United States. Through this survey, we can better understand which contexts and concerns are most bothersome and how often device owners are willing to accommodate incidental users’ privacy preferences. We found some surprising trends in terms of what people are most worried about and what actions they are willing to take. For example, while participants who did not own devices themselves were often uncomfortable imagining them in their own homes, they were not as concerned about being affected by such devices in homes that they entered as part of their jobs. Participants showed interest in privacy solutions that might have a technical implementation component, but also frequently envisioned an open dialogue between incidental users and device owners to negotiate privacy accommodations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我将不得不评估他们的反对意见”:智能家居设备所有者和附带用户之间的隐私紧张关系
最近的研究和流行媒体上的文章引起了人们对智能家居设备可能给偶然用户(那些遇到由其他人拥有、控制和配置的智能家居设备的人)带来的隐私风险的关注。在这项工作中,我们展示了一项以用户为中心的调查结果,该调查探讨了附带用户的体验以及设备所有者和附带用户之间产生的紧张关系。我们进行了五次焦点小组会议,通过这些会议,我们确定了某些人可能会遇到其他人的智能家居设备的特定环境,以及设备所有者和偶然用户在这种情况下的主要关注点。我们利用这些发现来设计一种调查工具,我们将其部署到美国386名具有人口统计学代表性的成年人样本中。通过这项调查,我们可以更好地了解哪些环境和问题是最令人烦恼的,以及设备所有者愿意在多大程度上满足偶然用户的隐私偏好。我们在人们最担心的事情和他们愿意采取的行动方面发现了一些令人惊讶的趋势。例如,虽然自己没有电子设备的参与者通常会不舒服地想象自己家里有电子设备,但他们并不担心作为工作一部分进入家中的电子设备会受到影响。参与者对可能包含技术实现组件的隐私解决方案表现出兴趣,但也经常设想偶然用户和设备所有者之间进行公开对话,以协商隐私安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editors' Introduction Compact and Divisible E-Cash with Threshold Issuance On the Robustness of Topics API to a Re-Identification Attack DP-SIPS: A simpler, more scalable mechanism for differentially private partition selection Privacy-Preserving Federated Recurrent Neural Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1