Modern light on ancient feud: Robert Hooke and Newton's graphical method

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Historia Mathematica Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hm.2021.11.002
Siu A. Chin
{"title":"Modern light on ancient feud: Robert Hooke and Newton's graphical method","authors":"Siu A. Chin","doi":"10.1016/j.hm.2021.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The feud between Robert Hooke and Isaac Newton, over whether Newton should have acknowledged Hooke's influence on his graphical method of constructing planet orbits, the celebrated </span>Proposition 1, Theorem 1 of the </span><span><em>Principia</em></span><span>, has remained ongoing among their respective supporters, even after 300 years. The drama has escalated in recent decades, with a claim that Hooke may have used the same method and obtained an elliptical orbit for a linear force, a feat that some considered Newton never did for the inverse-square force. Modern understanding of Newton's graphical method as a symplectic integrator can now shed light on whether this claim is creditable.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51061,"journal":{"name":"Historia Mathematica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia Mathematica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031508602200009X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The feud between Robert Hooke and Isaac Newton, over whether Newton should have acknowledged Hooke's influence on his graphical method of constructing planet orbits, the celebrated Proposition 1, Theorem 1 of the Principia, has remained ongoing among their respective supporters, even after 300 years. The drama has escalated in recent decades, with a claim that Hooke may have used the same method and obtained an elliptical orbit for a linear force, a feat that some considered Newton never did for the inverse-square force. Modern understanding of Newton's graphical method as a symplectic integrator can now shed light on whether this claim is creditable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古代恩怨的现代阐释:罗伯特·胡克和牛顿的图解方法
罗伯特·胡克(Robert Hooke)和艾萨克·牛顿(Isaac Newton)之间的争执,即牛顿是否应该承认胡克对他构建行星轨道的图形方法的影响,即著名的命题1,即原理1定理,在他们各自的支持者中仍然存在,即使在300年后。近几十年来,这场闹剧不断升级,有人声称胡克可能使用了同样的方法,并得到了线性力的椭圆轨道,一些人认为牛顿从未得到过平方反比力的这一壮举。对牛顿图解法作为辛积分器的现代理解,现在可以阐明这种说法是否可信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Historia Mathematica
Historia Mathematica 数学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Historia Mathematica publishes historical scholarship on mathematics and its development in all cultures and time periods. In particular, the journal encourages informed studies on mathematicians and their work in historical context, on the histories of institutions and organizations supportive of the mathematical endeavor, on historiographical topics in the history of mathematics, and on the interrelations between mathematical ideas, science, and the broader culture.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Abstracts Henk J. M. Bos (1940–2024): A first assessment of his legacy in the field of history of mathematics Euclidean terms in European languages, 1482–1703 The Richness of the History of Mathematics: A Tribute to Jeremy Gray. Karine Chemla, José Ferreirós, Lizhen Ji, Erhard Scholz, Chang Wang (eds.). Springer, 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1