In Defense of Public Debt, Barry Eichengreen, Asmaa El-Ganainy, Rui Esteves and Kris James Mitchener. Oxford University Press, 2021, vii + 305 pages.

IF 1.2 2区 哲学 Q3 ECONOMICS Economics and Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI:10.1017/S0266267122000104
Anahí Wiedenbrüg
{"title":"In Defense of Public Debt, Barry Eichengreen, Asmaa El-Ganainy, Rui Esteves and Kris James Mitchener. Oxford University Press, 2021, vii + 305 pages.","authors":"Anahí Wiedenbrüg","doi":"10.1017/S0266267122000104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stressing both commonalities and changes of the uses to which sovereign debt was put over time, the authors explain how sovereign debt developed into a safe asset and how it contributed to the development of financial markets, and the economy more generally, serving as an important tool for counter-cyclical spending which limited the incidence of economic depressions. Writing about the most recent spike in indebtedness, they acknowledge that running the sort of large, persistent primary surpluses required to bring down the level of indebtedness generated by Covid are rare, that attempting to raise taxes is challenging when the wealthy and their financial assets can move, and that a burst of inflation that liquidates debt burdens seems unlikely in the current context. Despite the difficulties created by unleashing ‘a tsunami of debt’ (199), the authors are adamant that a failure to act in the face of a national emergency – such as a war, a systemic financial crisis or a pandemic –would rob a government of its legitimacy. Collective Action Clauses (CACs) – provisions specifying that a supermajority of bondholders can change the terms of a bond – are also discussed by the authors.","PeriodicalId":51643,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267122000104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stressing both commonalities and changes of the uses to which sovereign debt was put over time, the authors explain how sovereign debt developed into a safe asset and how it contributed to the development of financial markets, and the economy more generally, serving as an important tool for counter-cyclical spending which limited the incidence of economic depressions. Writing about the most recent spike in indebtedness, they acknowledge that running the sort of large, persistent primary surpluses required to bring down the level of indebtedness generated by Covid are rare, that attempting to raise taxes is challenging when the wealthy and their financial assets can move, and that a burst of inflation that liquidates debt burdens seems unlikely in the current context. Despite the difficulties created by unleashing ‘a tsunami of debt’ (199), the authors are adamant that a failure to act in the face of a national emergency – such as a war, a systemic financial crisis or a pandemic –would rob a government of its legitimacy. Collective Action Clauses (CACs) – provisions specifying that a supermajority of bondholders can change the terms of a bond – are also discussed by the authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barry Eichengreen、Asmaa El Ganainy、Rui Esteves和Kris James Mitchener为公共债务辩护。牛津大学出版社,2021,vii+305页。
随着时间的推移,作者强调了主权债务的共性和用途的变化,解释了主权债务如何发展成为一种安全的资产,以及它如何促进金融市场和更广泛的经济的发展,作为反周期支出的重要工具,限制了经济萧条的发生。在谈到最近的债务飙升时,他们承认,维持降低新冠肺炎造成的债务水平所需的那种大规模、持续的基本盈余是罕见的,在富人及其金融资产可以流动的情况下,试图增税是一项挑战,在当前背景下,消除债务负担的通胀爆发似乎不太可能。尽管释放“债务海啸”(1999)造成了困难,但这组作者坚持认为,面对国家紧急情况——比如战争、系统性金融危机或流行病——不采取行动将剥夺政府的合法性。作者还讨论了集体行动条款(CACs)——规定绝对多数债券持有人可以改变债券条款的条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The disciplines of economics and philosophy each possess their own special analytical methods, whose combination is powerful and fruitful. Each discipline can be enriched by the other. Economics and Philosophy aims to promote their mutual enrichment by publishing articles and book reviews in all areas linking these subjects. Topics include the methodology and epistemology of economics, the foundations of decision theory and game theory, the nature of rational choice in general, historical work on economics with a philosophical purpose, ethical issues in economics, the use of economic techniques in ethical theory, and many other subjects.
期刊最新文献
Isolationism, instrumentalism and fiscal policy EAP volume 40 issue 1 Cover and Front matter Fair equality of chances for prediction-based decisions Better than nothing: On defining the valence of a life Must Prioritarians be Antiegalitarian?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1