Preferred Preservation Formats for Digital Music Scores: A Survey of University Music Faculty

IF 1.1 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC NOTES Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/not.2023.a897455
Stephanie Akau, Janet McKinney, Rachel McNellis
{"title":"Preferred Preservation Formats for Digital Music Scores: A Survey of University Music Faculty","authors":"Stephanie Akau, Janet McKinney, Rachel McNellis","doi":"10.1353/not.2023.a897455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Digitally notated music scores are widely created and distributed. But the collaborative nature of the online environment and variety of file formats and software choices, both proprietary and open-source, present unique challenges for archivists when it comes to sharing, preserving, and providing access to these digital scores now and into the future. This article addresses the advantages and disadvantages of file formats for digital notated music scores that offer the greatest potential for long-term preservation, sustainability, and future accessibility. These formats, outlined in the Library of Congress's Recommended Formats Statement, are MusicXML, the Music Encoding Initiative (MEI) schema, and PDF/UA/A. The authors conducted a survey of eighty-nine music professors at twenty-two universities to determine the extent to which they utilize these different file formats as well as digital preservation best practices in their work. All respondents who create musical scores use digital notation software. While most utilize PDF and discuss this format with their students, far fewer use MusicXML and MEI. Only 46 percent were aware of the principles of digital preservation. The article concludes with a detailed analysis of the results from this survey, which revealed ways in which information professionals can educate faculty about responsible measures that will ensure the long-term accessibility and research potential of digital music scores in an ever-changing digital world.","PeriodicalId":44162,"journal":{"name":"NOTES","volume":"79 1","pages":"495 - 523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NOTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/not.2023.a897455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Digitally notated music scores are widely created and distributed. But the collaborative nature of the online environment and variety of file formats and software choices, both proprietary and open-source, present unique challenges for archivists when it comes to sharing, preserving, and providing access to these digital scores now and into the future. This article addresses the advantages and disadvantages of file formats for digital notated music scores that offer the greatest potential for long-term preservation, sustainability, and future accessibility. These formats, outlined in the Library of Congress's Recommended Formats Statement, are MusicXML, the Music Encoding Initiative (MEI) schema, and PDF/UA/A. The authors conducted a survey of eighty-nine music professors at twenty-two universities to determine the extent to which they utilize these different file formats as well as digital preservation best practices in their work. All respondents who create musical scores use digital notation software. While most utilize PDF and discuss this format with their students, far fewer use MusicXML and MEI. Only 46 percent were aware of the principles of digital preservation. The article concludes with a detailed analysis of the results from this survey, which revealed ways in which information professionals can educate faculty about responsible measures that will ensure the long-term accessibility and research potential of digital music scores in an ever-changing digital world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字乐谱的首选保存格式——对高校音乐学院的调查
摘要:数字乐谱被广泛创建和分发。但是,在线环境的协作性质以及各种文件格式和软件选择,无论是专有的还是开源的,在现在和未来共享、保存和提供这些数字分数的访问时,都给档案管理员带来了独特的挑战。本文讨论了数字乐谱文件格式的优缺点,这些文件格式在长期保存、可持续性和未来可访问性方面具有最大潜力。国会图书馆的推荐格式声明中概述了这些格式,它们是MusicXML、音乐编码倡议(MEI)模式和PDF/UA/A。作者对22所大学的89名音乐教授进行了一项调查,以确定他们在工作中使用这些不同文件格式的程度以及数字保存的最佳实践。所有制作乐谱的受访者都使用数字记谱软件。虽然大多数人使用PDF并与学生讨论这种格式,但很少有人使用MusicXML和MEI。只有46%的人知道数字保存的原则。文章最后对这项调查的结果进行了详细分析,揭示了信息专业人员如何教育教师采取负责任的措施,以确保数字乐谱在不断变化的数字世界中的长期可访问性和研究潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NOTES
NOTES MUSIC-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Academic Music Libraries Clara Schumann Studies ed. by Joe Davies (review) In Search of the Saxophone: Its Origins and Functions by Bryan Kendall (review) Twentieth-Century Music in the West: An Introduction by Tom Perchard et al (review) Discovery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1