Can Low Retirement Savings Be Rationalized?

Abstract

Simple presentations of the life cycle model often suggest a constant level of real consumption in retirement. Similarly, financial planners commonly suggest that people save for retirement in such a way as to enable them to maintain a level retirement standard of living equal to their standard of living while working. However, constant consumption with age is only optimal under the precise and unlikely condition that the subjective rate of time preference is equal to the real interest rate. Most people exhibit a positive rate of pure time preference, and additionally discount the future by both mortality and morbidity risks. In comparison, the real interest rate is roughly 0%—and the term structure of interest rates suggests this condition is likely to persist. These considerations suggest that optimal consumption in the life cycle model declines with age. This finding has major implications for optimal retirement saving. For instance, we find that for many, perhaps most, people in the bottom half of the lifetime earnings distribution, it is optimal to spend out their retirement wealth well before death and to live on Social Security alone after that. Very low earners may find it optimal to not engage in retirement saving at all. TOPICS: Long-term/retirement investing, portfolio theory Key Findings ▪ Under plausible assumptions, optimal consumption in the life cycle model declines with age. ▪ For many people in the bottom half of the lifetime earnings distribution, it is optimal to spend out retirement wealth well before death and live on Social Security alone after that. ▪ These results stand in contrast to standard financial planning advice that people save for retirement in such a way as to enable them to maintain a level retirement standard of living equal to their standard of living while working.