THE USE OF STEVIA AND MONK FRUIT SWEETENERS FOR SUGAR REPLACEMENT IN GREEN TEA AGAR JELLIES

A. Akesowan, A. Choonhahirun
{"title":"THE USE OF STEVIA AND MONK FRUIT SWEETENERS FOR SUGAR REPLACEMENT IN GREEN TEA AGAR JELLIES","authors":"A. Akesowan, A. Choonhahirun","doi":"10.33512/fsj.v3i2.12404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to develop healthy agar jellies with low-sugar content, linking to a decreased risk for heart attack, diabetes, and other chronic diseases. Two natural nonnutritive sweeteners, stevia and monk fruit were studied at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% sugar replacement based on the equivalent sucrose sweetness. The physical properties assessed on the total soluble solids, firmness, color, and syneresis. Still, the sensory attributes on color, taste, flavor, texture, and overall acceptability was evaluated by a 9point hedonic scale. The more sugar replacement lowered the total soluble solids but increased the gel firmness (p<0.05) and the lightness (L*). The syneresis declined in reduced-sugar jellies with stevia and monk fruit against the whole sugar jellies. The stevia and monk fruit replacement affected agar jellies' taste and flavor attributes (p<0.05). Jellies with 50% and 75% sugar replacement, either stevia or monk fruit, were preferred over 25% and 100% replacement. The jelly with 50% stevia was the optimal formulation.","PeriodicalId":52713,"journal":{"name":"Food ScienTech Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food ScienTech Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33512/fsj.v3i2.12404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop healthy agar jellies with low-sugar content, linking to a decreased risk for heart attack, diabetes, and other chronic diseases. Two natural nonnutritive sweeteners, stevia and monk fruit were studied at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% sugar replacement based on the equivalent sucrose sweetness. The physical properties assessed on the total soluble solids, firmness, color, and syneresis. Still, the sensory attributes on color, taste, flavor, texture, and overall acceptability was evaluated by a 9point hedonic scale. The more sugar replacement lowered the total soluble solids but increased the gel firmness (p<0.05) and the lightness (L*). The syneresis declined in reduced-sugar jellies with stevia and monk fruit against the whole sugar jellies. The stevia and monk fruit replacement affected agar jellies' taste and flavor attributes (p<0.05). Jellies with 50% and 75% sugar replacement, either stevia or monk fruit, were preferred over 25% and 100% replacement. The jelly with 50% stevia was the optimal formulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在绿茶琼脂果冻中使用甜菊糖和罗汉果甜味剂代替糖
这项研究旨在开发低糖含量的健康琼脂果冻,这与降低心脏病、糖尿病和其他慢性疾病的风险有关。在同等蔗糖甜度的基础上,研究了两种天然无营养甜味剂,甜叶菊和罗汉果,分别以25%、50%、75%和100%的糖替代品进行研究。物理性质评估的总可溶性固形物,硬度,颜色和协同作用。尽管如此,颜色、味道、味道、质地和整体可接受性的感官属性是通过9分的享乐量表来评估的。糖的增加降低了可溶性固形物总量,但提高了凝胶硬度(p<0.05)和轻度(L*)。与全糖果冻相比,甜叶菊和罗汉果的还原糖果冻的光合作用有所下降。甜叶菊和罗汉果替代对琼脂果冻的口感和风味属性有显著影响(p<0.05)。替代50%和75%糖的果冻(甜叶菊或罗汉果)比替代25%和100%糖的果冻更受欢迎。含50%甜菊糖的果冻是最佳配方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physicochemical Characteristics and Dietary Fiber of Analog Rice from Seaweed (Sargassum sp.) and Beneng Taro Combination Assessment of Unfermented Beverages Intake by Adult Population in Herat City Quality of Gluten Free Bread with the Addition of Xanthan Gum and Different Kneading Methods Physicochemical, Mineral, and Sensory Properties of Masuku (Uapaca kirkiana) Beverages Pigskin Treatment Using Different Food-Grade-Acids: Effects on The Physicochemical Characteristics of The By-Products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1