Cashew contract farming in Ghana: implications on farm performance and household welfare

IF 2.4 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies Pub Date : 2022-08-19 DOI:10.1108/jadee-12-2021-0339
G. Danso-Abbeam, A. Ogundeji, S. Fosu
{"title":"Cashew contract farming in Ghana: implications on farm performance and household welfare","authors":"G. Danso-Abbeam, A. Ogundeji, S. Fosu","doi":"10.1108/jadee-12-2021-0339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeEfforts to reduce farmers' market risks and improve buyers' access to farm commodities have encouraged contract farming (CF) in Ghana's cashew sector in recent years. Consequently, the existence of CF shows that farmers who use it may be benefiting from it, as it is their economic responsibility to decide how to sell agricultural products. However, the magnitudes of these benefits or otherwise have been inadequately explored. This paper aims to empirically estimate the impact of CF on farm performance and welfare of smallholder cashew farmers.Design/methodology/approachThe study used probit-two-stage least square (probit-2sls) as a primary estimator to account for self-selection bias and endogeneity that could arise from both observed and unobserved heterogeneities among farming households to estimate the causal effects of CF on farm performance and household welfare.FindingsThe results indicated that participation in CF contribute significantly to the gains in farm performance (price margins, yields and net farm revenue) and welfare (consumption expenditure per capita), and that the non-participants of CF would have benefited substantially if they had participated. An analysis of the farm size disaggregated into small, medium and large with regards to the outcome variables produces mixed results.Research limitations/implicationsIt can be concluded that participating in CF enhances farm performance and household welfare.Originality/valueWhile many other studies do not account for changes in farm performance and welfare due to differences in farm size or other observed factors, this study fills a crucial void.","PeriodicalId":45976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jadee-12-2021-0339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeEfforts to reduce farmers' market risks and improve buyers' access to farm commodities have encouraged contract farming (CF) in Ghana's cashew sector in recent years. Consequently, the existence of CF shows that farmers who use it may be benefiting from it, as it is their economic responsibility to decide how to sell agricultural products. However, the magnitudes of these benefits or otherwise have been inadequately explored. This paper aims to empirically estimate the impact of CF on farm performance and welfare of smallholder cashew farmers.Design/methodology/approachThe study used probit-two-stage least square (probit-2sls) as a primary estimator to account for self-selection bias and endogeneity that could arise from both observed and unobserved heterogeneities among farming households to estimate the causal effects of CF on farm performance and household welfare.FindingsThe results indicated that participation in CF contribute significantly to the gains in farm performance (price margins, yields and net farm revenue) and welfare (consumption expenditure per capita), and that the non-participants of CF would have benefited substantially if they had participated. An analysis of the farm size disaggregated into small, medium and large with regards to the outcome variables produces mixed results.Research limitations/implicationsIt can be concluded that participating in CF enhances farm performance and household welfare.Originality/valueWhile many other studies do not account for changes in farm performance and welfare due to differences in farm size or other observed factors, this study fills a crucial void.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳腰果合同农业:对农场绩效和家庭福利的影响
目的近年来,减少农民市场风险和改善买家获得农产品的机会的努力鼓励了加纳腰果部门的合同农业(CF)。因此,CF的存在表明,使用它的农民可能会从中受益,因为决定如何销售农产品是他们的经济责任。然而,这些利益的大小或其他方面尚未得到充分探讨。本文旨在实证评估CF对腰果小农经营绩效和福利的影响。本研究使用probit-two-stage最小二乘(probit-2sls)作为主要估计量,以解释农户之间观察到的和未观察到的异质性可能产生的自我选择偏差和内生性,以估计CF对农场绩效和家庭福利的因果影响。研究结果表明,参与农业资源共享对农场绩效(价格边际、产量和农场净收入)和福利(人均消费支出)的提高有显著贡献,而非农业资源共享参与者如果参与,也会受益匪浅。根据结果变量对农场规模分为小型、中型和大型的分析得出了不同的结果。研究的局限性/启示可以得出结论,参与农业生产可以提高农场绩效和家庭福利。原创性/价值虽然许多其他研究没有考虑由于农场规模或其他观察到的因素的差异而导致的农场绩效和福利的变化,但本研究填补了一个至关重要的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
37.50%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies publishes double-blind peer-reviewed research on issues relevant to agriculture and food value chain in emerging economies in Asia, Africa, Latin America and Eastern Europe. The journal welcomes original research, particularly empirical/applied, quantitative and qualitative work on topics pertaining to policies, processes, and practices in the agribusiness arena in emerging economies to inform researchers, practitioners and policy makers
期刊最新文献
Impact of agricultural credit sources heterogeneity on rice production efficiency in Côte d'Ivoire Triple Helix approach to innovation in Rwanda's agriculture resulted in a partnership between educational institutions and a private firm producing clean seed potatoes Affordability and sustainability in the human right to water Regional heterogeneity in undernourishment: the case of Nepal The effect of COVID-19 containment measures on fresh food market vendors in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1