Characteristics of metaphor and reasoning comprehension ability of school-aged children with language development delay

Eun Kyoung Lee
{"title":"Characteristics of metaphor and reasoning comprehension ability of school-aged children with language development delay","authors":"Eun Kyoung Lee","doi":"10.21849/cacd.2022.00780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study compares the degree of metaphor and reasoning comprehension development of three groups by evaluating the metaphor and reasoning comprehension of children with language development delay, children with matching language age, and children with matching chronological age.Methods: The subjects of the study were 15 children with delayed language development, 15 children with matching chronological age, and 15 children with matching language age. In order to find out their understanding of metaphors and reasoning, the test was conducted by presenting a stimulus plan with three stimulation pictures on one panel in which a subject selects a corresponding picture from the three pictures according to the inspector’s verbal instruction. The test consists of 70 questions, and the stimulus picture of metaphor and reasoning comprehension consists of figurative, dictionary, and inappropriate content.Results: Metaphor and reasoning comprehension was tested with the contents of metaphor ability based on substantive objects and metaphor ability based on abstract objects, with the following results. First, there was a significant difference between these groups as a result of comparing the development of metaphor and reasoning comprehension of children with delayed language development, children with matching language age, and children with matching chronological age. Second, there was no difference in metaphor and inference comprehension between the children’s group with language development delay and the children’s group with matching chronological age as they both showed high performance and their metaphor and inference comprehension was homogeneous. Third, as a result of comparing the metaphorical abilities of the children’s group with language development delay and the other children’s groups, it was found that an intervention program is needed to improve the metaphor and reasoning comprehension of children with language development delay. In particular, it is necessary to develop an arbitration method, which focuses on conceptualizing light abstract ideas, to improve their metaphor and reasoning comprehension.Conclusions: Based on this result, systematic intervention according to the degree of development of metaphor and reasoning ability is necessary to improve the social communication ability of children with delayed language development.","PeriodicalId":10238,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21849/cacd.2022.00780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares the degree of metaphor and reasoning comprehension development of three groups by evaluating the metaphor and reasoning comprehension of children with language development delay, children with matching language age, and children with matching chronological age.Methods: The subjects of the study were 15 children with delayed language development, 15 children with matching chronological age, and 15 children with matching language age. In order to find out their understanding of metaphors and reasoning, the test was conducted by presenting a stimulus plan with three stimulation pictures on one panel in which a subject selects a corresponding picture from the three pictures according to the inspector’s verbal instruction. The test consists of 70 questions, and the stimulus picture of metaphor and reasoning comprehension consists of figurative, dictionary, and inappropriate content.Results: Metaphor and reasoning comprehension was tested with the contents of metaphor ability based on substantive objects and metaphor ability based on abstract objects, with the following results. First, there was a significant difference between these groups as a result of comparing the development of metaphor and reasoning comprehension of children with delayed language development, children with matching language age, and children with matching chronological age. Second, there was no difference in metaphor and inference comprehension between the children’s group with language development delay and the children’s group with matching chronological age as they both showed high performance and their metaphor and inference comprehension was homogeneous. Third, as a result of comparing the metaphorical abilities of the children’s group with language development delay and the other children’s groups, it was found that an intervention program is needed to improve the metaphor and reasoning comprehension of children with language development delay. In particular, it is necessary to develop an arbitration method, which focuses on conceptualizing light abstract ideas, to improve their metaphor and reasoning comprehension.Conclusions: Based on this result, systematic intervention according to the degree of development of metaphor and reasoning ability is necessary to improve the social communication ability of children with delayed language development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言发展迟缓学龄儿童隐喻与推理理解能力的特征
目的:本研究通过评估语言发育迟缓儿童、语言年龄匹配儿童和按时间顺序匹配儿童的隐喻和推理理解,比较三组儿童的隐喻与推理理解发展程度。方法:研究对象为15名语言发育迟缓的儿童、15名按时间顺序匹配的儿童和15名语言年龄匹配的儿童。为了了解他们对隐喻和推理的理解,测试通过在一个面板上展示一个带有三张刺激图片的刺激计划来进行,受试者根据检查员的口头指示从三张图片中选择相应的图片。测试由70道题组成,隐喻和推理理解的刺激图由比喻、词典和不当内容组成。结果:分别以基于实体对象的隐喻能力和基于抽象对象的隐喻技能为内容,对隐喻和推理理解进行了测试,结果如下。首先,通过比较语言发育迟缓儿童、语言年龄匹配儿童和按时间顺序匹配儿童的隐喻和推理理解的发展,这些组之间存在显著差异。其次,语言发育迟缓的儿童组和年龄匹配的儿童组在隐喻和推理理解方面没有差异,因为他们都表现出很高的表现,而且他们的隐喻和推理解释是同质的。第三,通过对语言发育迟缓儿童组和其他儿童组的隐喻能力的比较,发现需要一个干预方案来提高语言发展迟缓儿童的隐喻和推理理解能力。特别是,有必要开发一种仲裁方法,该方法侧重于概念化轻抽象思想,以提高其隐喻和推理理解。结论:基于这一结果,有必要根据隐喻和推理能力的发展程度进行系统干预,以提高语言发育迟缓儿童的社会交际能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders
Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders Health Professions-Speech and Hearing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Parent mediated Group Intervention Program for Developmental Language Disorders Trajectory of Voice Rehabilitation in Ortner’s Syndrome: A Case Report The Effect of Dysphagia on Quality of Life in Stroke Patients The Impact of High-Contact Sports on Memory and Auditory Comprehension in Young Athletes following Sports-Related Concussions Research on the methodology of LSA with preschool children: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1