A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognosis of language outcomes for individuals with autism spectrum disorder

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Autism and Developmental Language Impairments Pub Date : 2018-05-01 DOI:10.1177/2396941518767610
Amanda Brignell, A. Morgan, S. Woolfenden, Felicity Klopper, T. May, Vanessa Sarkozy, Katrina Jane Williams
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognosis of language outcomes for individuals with autism spectrum disorder","authors":"Amanda Brignell, A. Morgan, S. Woolfenden, Felicity Klopper, T. May, Vanessa Sarkozy, Katrina Jane Williams","doi":"10.1177/2396941518767610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Language difficulties are common in autism spectrum disorder, yet little is known about the prognosis of language in children with autism spectrum disorder. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies reporting language outcomes in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Method A comprehensive search strategy with a well-established sensitive prognosis filter for Medline, adapted for five other databases, was used. Included studies observed individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder for ≥12 months and had ≥30 participants. Risk of bias was assessed. Results Fifty-four studies (N = 5064) met inclusion criteria. Language outcomes were standardised assessments (n = 35), notation of presence/absence of verbal language (n = 11) or both (n = 8). Age at baseline ranged from 17 months to 26 years, duration of follow-up from 1 to 38 years. Most publications (92%) were rated medium to high risk of bias. In all but one study individuals had below-average scores at baseline and follow-up. However, in most (n = 24/25; 96%) studies reporting standard scores, individuals (aged ≤ 11 years at follow-up) progressed at a comparable rate to age-expected norms or demonstrated some ‘catch up’ over time. Meta-analyses found mean standard scores increased over time in three language domains (composite receptive language, composite expressive language and adaptive language). Nineteen to thirty percent of children aged five years and under gained verbal language. For children aged over five years 5–32% gained verbal language over the course of study. Age, baseline language scores, IQ and length of follow-up did not moderate between study differences in composite language or adaptive language growth or the acquisition of verbal language. Conclusion Despite variability in study methods, findings were consistent, with the majority of studies reporting children under 11 years on average progressed at a comparable rate to age-expected norms or with some ‘catchup’ over time. Implications This review provides synthesised information for families and clinicians on language development over time and on language outcomes for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Such information can be useful for prognostic counselling and may assist planning around future resources and support needs. This review also makes recommendations regarding methodology for future studies so that prognosis can become more fine-tuned at an individual level.","PeriodicalId":36716,"journal":{"name":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2396941518767610","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941518767610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Background Language difficulties are common in autism spectrum disorder, yet little is known about the prognosis of language in children with autism spectrum disorder. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies reporting language outcomes in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Method A comprehensive search strategy with a well-established sensitive prognosis filter for Medline, adapted for five other databases, was used. Included studies observed individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder for ≥12 months and had ≥30 participants. Risk of bias was assessed. Results Fifty-four studies (N = 5064) met inclusion criteria. Language outcomes were standardised assessments (n = 35), notation of presence/absence of verbal language (n = 11) or both (n = 8). Age at baseline ranged from 17 months to 26 years, duration of follow-up from 1 to 38 years. Most publications (92%) were rated medium to high risk of bias. In all but one study individuals had below-average scores at baseline and follow-up. However, in most (n = 24/25; 96%) studies reporting standard scores, individuals (aged ≤ 11 years at follow-up) progressed at a comparable rate to age-expected norms or demonstrated some ‘catch up’ over time. Meta-analyses found mean standard scores increased over time in three language domains (composite receptive language, composite expressive language and adaptive language). Nineteen to thirty percent of children aged five years and under gained verbal language. For children aged over five years 5–32% gained verbal language over the course of study. Age, baseline language scores, IQ and length of follow-up did not moderate between study differences in composite language or adaptive language growth or the acquisition of verbal language. Conclusion Despite variability in study methods, findings were consistent, with the majority of studies reporting children under 11 years on average progressed at a comparable rate to age-expected norms or with some ‘catchup’ over time. Implications This review provides synthesised information for families and clinicians on language development over time and on language outcomes for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Such information can be useful for prognostic counselling and may assist planning around future resources and support needs. This review also makes recommendations regarding methodology for future studies so that prognosis can become more fine-tuned at an individual level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症谱系障碍患者语言预后的系统回顾与荟萃分析
语言障碍在自闭症谱系障碍中很常见,但对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的语言预后知之甚少。本研究的目的是系统地回顾有关自闭症谱系障碍患者语言结果的研究报告。方法采用综合搜索策略,建立Medline敏感预后过滤器,并适用于其他5个数据库。纳入的研究观察诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的个体≥12个月,参与者≥30人。评估偏倚风险。结果54项研究(N = 5064)符合纳入标准。语言结果是标准化评估(n = 35),口头语言存在/缺失标记(n = 11)或两者兼而有之(n = 8)。基线年龄为17个月至26岁,随访时间为1至38年。大多数出版物(92%)被评为中至高偏倚风险。除一项研究外,所有研究对象在基线和随访时的得分都低于平均水平。然而,在大多数(n = 24/25;96%)的研究报告了标准分数,个体(随访时年龄≤11岁)的进展速度与预期年龄标准相当,或者随着时间的推移显示出一定程度的“追赶”。荟萃分析发现,三个语言领域(复合接受语言、复合表达语言和适应性语言)的平均标准分数随着时间的推移而增加。19%到30%的5岁及以下儿童获得了语言能力。对于5岁以上的儿童,5-32%的人在学习过程中获得了口头语言能力。年龄、基线语言分数、智商和随访时间在复合语言、适应性语言生长或口头语言习得的研究差异中没有调节作用。尽管研究方法存在差异,但研究结果是一致的,大多数研究报告称,11岁以下儿童的平均进步速度与年龄预期标准相当,或者随着时间的推移出现了一些“追赶”。本综述为自闭症谱系障碍患者的家庭和临床医生提供了关于语言发展和语言预后的综合信息。这些信息可用于预后咨询,并可能有助于规划未来的资源和支持需求。本综述还就未来研究的方法学提出了建议,以便在个体水平上对预后进行更精细的调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teachers' use of augmented input and responsive strategies in schools for students with intellectual disability: A multiple case study of a communication partner intervention. Early development score as a prognostic factor in nonverbal/minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder: A matched case-control study in Cyprus. Normal but Different: Autistic Adolescents Who Score Within Normal Ranges on Standardized Language Tests Produce Frequent Linguistic Irregularities in Spontaneous Discourse. "I need them for my autism, but I don't know why": Exploring the friendship experiences of autistic children in UK primary schools. How do children with language disorder perceive their peer interactions? A qualitative investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1