Addressing gender discrimination in cognitive assessment using the English Comprehension Test

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED SA Journal of Industrial Psychology Pub Date : 2021-03-11 DOI:10.4102/SAJIP.V47I0.1776
D. Arendse
{"title":"Addressing gender discrimination in cognitive assessment using the English Comprehension Test","authors":"D. Arendse","doi":"10.4102/SAJIP.V47I0.1776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a need to develop tests locally for the diverse population of South Africa, which presents a unique combination of multilingualism and multiculturalism that innately affect performance in internationally created tests (Bekwa, 2016; Foxcroft, 2004; Foxcroft, Roodt, & Abrahams, 2013; Laher & Cockcroft, 2017; Arendse, 2018). The culturally complex context of South Africa makes this a formidable, yet imperative task. The researcher undertook this task and empirically created the English Comprehension Test (ECT). The ECT, a South African empirically developed test, was identified as a measure for verbal reasoning (Arendse & Maree, 2019; Arendse, 2018, 2020) but it is still in the validation process. Orientation: The empirically designed English Comprehension Test (ECT) is theorised to measure verbal reasoning and is currently undergoing validation. The test development produced two versions of the ECT, namely, ECT version 1.2 and ECT version 1.3. This study focuses on the latest test version, ECT version 1.3.","PeriodicalId":47235,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJIP.V47I0.1776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is a need to develop tests locally for the diverse population of South Africa, which presents a unique combination of multilingualism and multiculturalism that innately affect performance in internationally created tests (Bekwa, 2016; Foxcroft, 2004; Foxcroft, Roodt, & Abrahams, 2013; Laher & Cockcroft, 2017; Arendse, 2018). The culturally complex context of South Africa makes this a formidable, yet imperative task. The researcher undertook this task and empirically created the English Comprehension Test (ECT). The ECT, a South African empirically developed test, was identified as a measure for verbal reasoning (Arendse & Maree, 2019; Arendse, 2018, 2020) but it is still in the validation process. Orientation: The empirically designed English Comprehension Test (ECT) is theorised to measure verbal reasoning and is currently undergoing validation. The test development produced two versions of the ECT, namely, ECT version 1.2 and ECT version 1.3. This study focuses on the latest test version, ECT version 1.3.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用英语理解测试解决认知评估中的性别歧视问题
有必要为南非的多样化人口在当地开发测试,这是多语言和多元文化的独特结合,自然会影响在国际上创建的测试中的表现(Bekwa, 2016;特,2004;福克斯克罗夫特,鲁特和亚伯拉罕,2013;Laher & Cockcroft, 2017;Arendse, 2018)。南非复杂的文化背景使这成为一项艰巨而又势在必行的任务。研究者承担了这个任务,并经验性地创造了英语理解测试(ECT)。ECT是南非经验开发的测试,被确定为口头推理的衡量标准(Arendse & Maree, 2019;Arendse, 2018, 2020),但仍处于验证过程中。取向:经验设计的英语理解测试(ECT)是理论上衡量口头推理,目前正在进行验证。测试开发产生了ECT的两个版本,即ECT 1.2版本和ECT 1.3版本。本研究的重点是最新的测试版本,ECT 1.3版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
The influence of ethical leadership and climate on employee work engagement Performance management process changes on the work identity of employees during COVID-19 Future-proofing talent management: Organisational implications and practical considerations Measurement of transformational leadership in South Africa: Assessed from an etic perspective An Editorial reflection: Towards building a research community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1