Misplaced Pterygoid Implant removed following Surgical Exploration

Surya Rao Rao Venkata Mahipathy, James Solomon Jesudasan, Ajay Chandrasekar V.S., Alagar Raja Durairaj, Manoj Ananthappan
{"title":"Misplaced Pterygoid Implant removed following Surgical Exploration","authors":"Surya Rao Rao Venkata Mahipathy, James Solomon Jesudasan, Ajay Chandrasekar V.S., Alagar Raja Durairaj, Manoj Ananthappan","doi":"10.14260/jemds.v12i6.430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 62-year-old male patient had reported to our department with a history of pterygoid implant placement in the right maxillary region. The referring dentist had updated us about the possibility of a misplaced implant. The patient was anxious but showed no clinical signs of discomfort or pain. A CT scan with contrast was done to check for the location of the implant and also visualize the proximity to any vital structures. The CT study revealed an implant seen in the right parapharyngeal space closely abutting the internal carotid artery. The screw of the implant was sharp and since it was closely abutting the internal carotid artery it warranted removal at the earliest. An endoscopic approach was discussed with the ENT surgeons but due to the size of the implant and limited access through the antrum we had to look for an alternative method. The technique of performing an access osteotomy of the maxilla would give better visualization and access to the implant but would require the maxilla to be plated and the patient who was 62 years old was not too keen on the thought of this procedure. Finally, an extraoral submandibular approach was finalized and used. Under general anaesthesia, a submandibular incision was marked and dissection was done, the carotid was first identified and taken control off in case we encountered any bleeding or injury to the internal maxillary artery while removing the implant. Dissection continued towards the mandible and the masseter was split to give access to the pterygoid region. An intraoperative C- arm showed that the implant was in close vicinity. The implant was removed intraorally via the buccal vestibule and the wound sites were closed without any complications.","PeriodicalId":47072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v12i6.430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 62-year-old male patient had reported to our department with a history of pterygoid implant placement in the right maxillary region. The referring dentist had updated us about the possibility of a misplaced implant. The patient was anxious but showed no clinical signs of discomfort or pain. A CT scan with contrast was done to check for the location of the implant and also visualize the proximity to any vital structures. The CT study revealed an implant seen in the right parapharyngeal space closely abutting the internal carotid artery. The screw of the implant was sharp and since it was closely abutting the internal carotid artery it warranted removal at the earliest. An endoscopic approach was discussed with the ENT surgeons but due to the size of the implant and limited access through the antrum we had to look for an alternative method. The technique of performing an access osteotomy of the maxilla would give better visualization and access to the implant but would require the maxilla to be plated and the patient who was 62 years old was not too keen on the thought of this procedure. Finally, an extraoral submandibular approach was finalized and used. Under general anaesthesia, a submandibular incision was marked and dissection was done, the carotid was first identified and taken control off in case we encountered any bleeding or injury to the internal maxillary artery while removing the implant. Dissection continued towards the mandible and the masseter was split to give access to the pterygoid region. An intraoperative C- arm showed that the implant was in close vicinity. The implant was removed intraorally via the buccal vestibule and the wound sites were closed without any complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术探查后取出错位的翼状骨植入物
一名62岁的男性患者向我科报告,有右上颌区域翼植入物植入史。转诊牙医向我们介绍了植入物错位的可能性。患者感到焦虑,但没有表现出任何不适或疼痛的临床症状。进行了CT对比扫描,以检查植入物的位置,并可视化与任何重要结构的接近程度。CT研究显示,右侧咽旁间隙有一个与颈内动脉紧密相连的植入物。植入物的螺钉很锋利,由于它紧贴颈内动脉,因此需要尽早取出。耳鼻喉科医生讨论了内窥镜方法,但由于植入物的大小和通过窦的通道有限,我们不得不寻找替代方法。进行上颌骨入路截骨的技术将提供更好的可视化和植入物的入路,但需要对上颌骨进行电镀,而62岁的患者并不太热衷于这种手术。最后,完成并使用了口外下颌下入路。在全身麻醉下,标记下颌下切口并进行解剖,首先确定颈动脉并将其控制住,以防在移除植入物时遇到上颌内动脉出血或损伤。继续对下颌骨进行解剖,咬肌被切开以进入翼骨区域。术中C型臂显示植入物就在附近。通过颊前庭在口内取出植入物,伤口部位闭合,没有任何并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
期刊最新文献
Emphysematous Pyelonephritis with Extension of Air in the Inferior Vena Cava Cytomorphological Pattern of Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Breast Lesions - An Institutional Experience of a Rural Tertiary Care Center Nephrotic Syndrome in Pregnancy - Case Reports Case Report - Trauma Induced Vernet’s Syndrome Leptomeningeal Metastases in Carcinoma Rectum with Extensive Skeletal Metastasis - A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1