Call for reflection on the feminist Left: why care, solidarity and abolitionism cannot sufficiently underwrite a radical programme of social change – Fraserian critical theory and an extended review of Cannibal Capitalism

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Feminist Theory Pub Date : 2023-06-07 DOI:10.1177/14647001231173218
Nicole Stybnarova
{"title":"Call for reflection on the feminist Left: why care, solidarity and abolitionism cannot sufficiently underwrite a radical programme of social change – Fraserian critical theory and an extended review of Cannibal Capitalism","authors":"Nicole Stybnarova","doi":"10.1177/14647001231173218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article first introduces and reviews Nancy Fraser's latest book Cannibal Capitalism. Next, it discusses the book's its programme for critical theory in the framework of Fraser's previous scholarship. It focuses on two ingredients of ‘Fraserian' critical theory: the role of difference in social justice-driven research and the separation of ontological and normative parts of such research. It then applies these specifically to feminist radical theories and explains why current, ostensibly non-economic, care-, solidarity- and abolitionist resistance programmes cannot underwrite sufficiently radical political programmes for social change. While these programmes' alternative ontologies are resourceful for informing and fomenting resistance, their potential to radically change social structures hinges upon their ability to relate their programme to other socially dominated and economically oppressed groups on the Left. Because capitalism codes both social domination and economic oppression, radical programmes would integrate their ostensibly non-economic ontological resources with a critique of capitalism to illuminate the common struggles of socially dominated and economically oppressed. ‘System crises critique' articulated by Fraser in Cannibal Capitalism is an example of one such ‘radical’ programme, which mobilises the working class as well as other marginalised groups, which are simultaneously economically oppressed and socially dominated.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001231173218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article first introduces and reviews Nancy Fraser's latest book Cannibal Capitalism. Next, it discusses the book's its programme for critical theory in the framework of Fraser's previous scholarship. It focuses on two ingredients of ‘Fraserian' critical theory: the role of difference in social justice-driven research and the separation of ontological and normative parts of such research. It then applies these specifically to feminist radical theories and explains why current, ostensibly non-economic, care-, solidarity- and abolitionist resistance programmes cannot underwrite sufficiently radical political programmes for social change. While these programmes' alternative ontologies are resourceful for informing and fomenting resistance, their potential to radically change social structures hinges upon their ability to relate their programme to other socially dominated and economically oppressed groups on the Left. Because capitalism codes both social domination and economic oppression, radical programmes would integrate their ostensibly non-economic ontological resources with a critique of capitalism to illuminate the common struggles of socially dominated and economically oppressed. ‘System crises critique' articulated by Fraser in Cannibal Capitalism is an example of one such ‘radical’ programme, which mobilises the working class as well as other marginalised groups, which are simultaneously economically oppressed and socially dominated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吁对女权主义左翼进行反思:为什么关怀、团结和废除主义不能充分保证激进的社会变革计划——弗雷泽式批判理论和对食人资本主义的延伸回顾
本文首先介绍和评述了南希·弗雷泽的新书《食人资本主义》。接下来,它在弗雷泽之前的学术框架下讨论了这本书的批判性理论课程。它侧重于“弗雷泽里安”批判理论的两个组成部分:差异在社会正义驱动的研究中的作用,以及这种研究的本体论和规范论部分的分离。然后,它将这些具体应用于女权主义激进理论,并解释了为什么目前表面上非经济、关怀、团结和废奴主义的抵抗计划不能为社会变革提供足够激进的政治计划。虽然这些计划的替代本体论在提供信息和煽动抵抗方面足智多谋,但它们从根本上改变社会结构的潜力取决于它们将其计划与其他社会主导和经济压迫的左翼群体联系起来的能力。由于资本主义既规范了社会统治,也规范了经济压迫,激进计划将把它们表面上的非经济本体论资源与对资本主义的批判结合起来,以阐明社会统治和经济压迫的共同斗争。”弗雷泽在《食人资本主义》中阐述的“制度危机批判”就是这样一个“激进”计划的例子,该计划动员了工人阶级和其他边缘化群体,他们同时受到经济压迫和社会支配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Theory
Feminist Theory WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Feminist Theory is an international interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for critical analysis and constructive debate within feminism. Theoretical Pluralism / Feminist Diversity Feminist Theory is genuinely interdisciplinary and reflects the diversity of feminism, incorporating perspectives from across the broad spectrum of the humanities and social sciences and the full range of feminist political and theoretical stances.
期刊最新文献
Drafting injustice: overturning Roe v. Wade, spillover effects and reproductive rights in context. Countertopographies of copper: Martha Rosler, Chris Kraus and the Great Arizona Copper Strike of 1983–1986 Social Reproduction Feminism and World-Culture: Introduction Between familism and neoliberalism: the case of Jewish Israeli grandmothers Domestic service and Chilean literature: fictional experiments in narrating the household
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1