A national survey of managed honey bee colony losses in the USA: results from the Bee Informed Partnership for 2017–18, 2018–19, and 2019–20

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Apicultural Research Pub Date : 2023-01-05 DOI:10.1080/00218839.2022.2158586
Selina Bruckner, Mikayla E. Wilson, D. Aurell, Karen Rennich, D. vanEngelsdorp, Nathalie Steinhauer, Geoffrey R. Williams
{"title":"A national survey of managed honey bee colony losses in the USA: results from the Bee Informed Partnership for 2017–18, 2018–19, and 2019–20","authors":"Selina Bruckner, Mikayla E. Wilson, D. Aurell, Karen Rennich, D. vanEngelsdorp, Nathalie Steinhauer, Geoffrey R. Williams","doi":"10.1080/00218839.2022.2158586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Beekeepers in the United States have experienced high losses of managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies for more than a decade. Long-term, multi-year monitoring efforts are crucial to provide a temporal and spatial context to these losses. To document and explain these losses, the Bee Informed Partnership has conducted national surveys on managed honey bee colonies since spring 2011, continuing the work of surveys first commissioned by the Apiary Inspectors of America in spring 2007. Here we present survey results from three years – 2017–18, 2018–19, and 2019–20. Each year, colony loss rates were estimated and compared among three loss periods – summer, winter, and annual – and three beekeeping operation types based on their number of colonies managed – backyard (≤50 colonies), sideline (51-500 colonies), and commercial (>500 colonies). At the national level, we recorded the highest winter colony loss rates (37.7%) in 2018–2019, while 2019 marked the year with the highest summer losses (32.1%). As documented in past surveys, we observed that smaller scale backyard beekeepers experienced the highest winter loss rates when compared to the larger operation types. Similarly, commercial beekeepers experienced higher loss rates during the summer compared to the other operation types. Overall, our results highlight the temporal variability, specifically among loss periods and years, of colony loss rates in the United States, and suggest a strong effect of beekeeping operation size.","PeriodicalId":15006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Apicultural Research","volume":"62 1","pages":"429 - 443"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Apicultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2022.2158586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Abstract Beekeepers in the United States have experienced high losses of managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies for more than a decade. Long-term, multi-year monitoring efforts are crucial to provide a temporal and spatial context to these losses. To document and explain these losses, the Bee Informed Partnership has conducted national surveys on managed honey bee colonies since spring 2011, continuing the work of surveys first commissioned by the Apiary Inspectors of America in spring 2007. Here we present survey results from three years – 2017–18, 2018–19, and 2019–20. Each year, colony loss rates were estimated and compared among three loss periods – summer, winter, and annual – and three beekeeping operation types based on their number of colonies managed – backyard (≤50 colonies), sideline (51-500 colonies), and commercial (>500 colonies). At the national level, we recorded the highest winter colony loss rates (37.7%) in 2018–2019, while 2019 marked the year with the highest summer losses (32.1%). As documented in past surveys, we observed that smaller scale backyard beekeepers experienced the highest winter loss rates when compared to the larger operation types. Similarly, commercial beekeepers experienced higher loss rates during the summer compared to the other operation types. Overall, our results highlight the temporal variability, specifically among loss periods and years, of colony loss rates in the United States, and suggest a strong effect of beekeeping operation size.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于美国管理蜂群损失的全国性调查:2017-18、2018-19和2019-20年蜜蜂知情伙伴关系的结果
摘要十多年来,美国养蜂人经历了管理蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)群落的大量损失。长期、多年的监测工作对于为这些损失提供时间和空间背景至关重要。为了记录和解释这些损失,蜜蜂知情伙伴关系自2011年春季以来对管理的蜜蜂群落进行了全国调查,继续了美国养蜂检查员于2007年春季首次委托进行的调查工作。在这里,我们展示了2017–18、2018–19和2019–20三年的调查结果。每年,根据管理的蜂群数量——后院(≤50个蜂群)、副业(51-500个蜂群)和商业(>500个蜂群),估计并比较三个损失期(夏季、冬季和年度)和三种养蜂作业类型的蜂群损失率。在国家层面上,我们在2018-2019年记录了最高的冬季蜂群损失率(37.7%),而2019年是夏季损失率最高的一年(32.1%)。正如过去的调查所记录的那样,我们观察到,与大型经营类型相比,小型后院养蜂人的冬季损失率最高。同样,与其他经营类型相比,商业养蜂人在夏季的损失率更高。总的来说,我们的研究结果突出了美国蜂群损失率的时间变异性,特别是在损失期和年份之间,并表明养蜂作业规模的强烈影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Apicultural Research is a refereed scientific journal dedicated to bringing the best research on bees. The Journal of Apicultural Research publishes original research articles, original theoretical papers, notes, comments and authoritative reviews on scientific aspects of the biology, ecology, natural history, conservation and culture of all types of bee (superfamily Apoidea).
期刊最新文献
High detection rate of the virulence plasmid pMP19 from Melissococcus plutonius -positive honey and larvae samples Honey bee stocks exhibit high levels of intra-colony variation in viral loads Effects of honey bee queen exposure to deformed wing virus-A on queen and juvenile infection and colony strength metrics Understanding the differential performance in hygienic behavior against dead brood of drones and workers of Apis mellifera : a chemical approach Liquid and solid matrix formic acid treatment comparison against Varroa mites in honey bee colonies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1