GLOCALIZATION AND THE DECENTRALIZATION OF PUBLIC POWER IN UKRAINE

O. Petryshyn, V. Serohin, S. Serohina
{"title":"GLOCALIZATION AND THE DECENTRALIZATION OF PUBLIC POWER IN UKRAINE","authors":"O. Petryshyn, V. Serohin, S. Serohina","doi":"10.13165/j.icj.2020.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the constitutional reform intended to promote decentralization in Ukraine. The reforms are currently being implemented and represent the manifestation of glocalization in the territorial organization of public power and local self-government. For the purposes of this article, glocalization is understood to mean a process of social development. Thus, in the context of globalization, regional and local differences are maintained or even strengthened rather than being dissolved. We assert that glocalization can be used to analyse – in-depth – the impact of reforms in the redistribution of power and financial resources on local (socio-political, legal, mental, and other) specifics. Notwithstanding, decentralization defines only the strategy and the main direction of relevant reforms, whereas their content, scope, consistency, and timing may vary depending on the tactics and ideology of the reformers. The article sets out the ways in which glocalization manifests itself in the decentralization of public power in Ukraine, in particular, how local self-government is being transformed by numerous factors. These include: conditions of “asymmetric” unitarism and social democracy; a combination of political and fiscal types of decentralization; specifics of power redistribution at the oblast (region), raion (district) and basic levels; as well as preference for bureaucratic forms of local self-government over municipal forms of direct democracy.","PeriodicalId":32140,"journal":{"name":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2020.12.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the constitutional reform intended to promote decentralization in Ukraine. The reforms are currently being implemented and represent the manifestation of glocalization in the territorial organization of public power and local self-government. For the purposes of this article, glocalization is understood to mean a process of social development. Thus, in the context of globalization, regional and local differences are maintained or even strengthened rather than being dissolved. We assert that glocalization can be used to analyse – in-depth – the impact of reforms in the redistribution of power and financial resources on local (socio-political, legal, mental, and other) specifics. Notwithstanding, decentralization defines only the strategy and the main direction of relevant reforms, whereas their content, scope, consistency, and timing may vary depending on the tactics and ideology of the reformers. The article sets out the ways in which glocalization manifests itself in the decentralization of public power in Ukraine, in particular, how local self-government is being transformed by numerous factors. These include: conditions of “asymmetric” unitarism and social democracy; a combination of political and fiscal types of decentralization; specifics of power redistribution at the oblast (region), raion (district) and basic levels; as well as preference for bureaucratic forms of local self-government over municipal forms of direct democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球化与乌克兰公共权力的分权
本文探讨了旨在促进乌克兰权力下放的宪法改革。这些改革目前正在实施,是公共权力和地方自治领土组织全球化的表现。就本文而言,全球化被理解为一个社会发展过程。因此,在全球化的背景下,区域和地方差异得以维持甚至加强,而不是被消除。我们断言,全球化可以用来深入分析权力和财政资源再分配改革对地方(社会政治、法律、心理和其他)细节的影响。尽管如此,权力下放只定义了相关改革的战略和主要方向,而其内容、范围、一致性和时机可能因改革者的策略和意识形态而异。这篇文章阐述了全球化在乌克兰公共权力下放中的表现方式,特别是地方自治是如何被多种因素所改变的。其中包括:“不对称”的统一主义和社会民主的条件;政治和财政类型的权力下放相结合;州(地区)、赖恩(地区)和基层权力再分配的具体情况;以及对官僚形式的地方自治政府比对市政形式的直接民主的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DOMESTIC REFORMS TOWARDS STRENGTHENING THE RULE OF LAW, IN GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, AND UKRAINE THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: WESTERN AND ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES SHOULD THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE DEVELOP A POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE CONDITIONS FOR THE BANKRUPTCY OF NATURAL PERSONS: WHICH BALTIC STATE IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE FOR BANKRUPTCY? WHAT CAN FRANCE LEARN FROM THE CZECH REPUBLIC’S APPROACH TO THE ISSUE OF WEARING (ISLAMIC) RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1