Unique stressors in a global pandemic: a mixed methods study about unique causes of distress among healthcare team members during COVID-19

Alejandra Colón-López, Katherine A Meese, Aoyjai P Montgomery, P. Patrician, David A Rogers, G. Burkholder
{"title":"Unique stressors in a global pandemic: a mixed methods study about unique causes of distress among healthcare team members during COVID-19","authors":"Alejandra Colón-López, Katherine A Meese, Aoyjai P Montgomery, P. Patrician, David A Rogers, G. Burkholder","doi":"10.21037/jhmhp-21-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare systems experienced significant challenges, including lower revenues from elective procedures, limited supplies, a massive influx of patients and psychologically distressed employees. National reports of well-being showed striking rates of burnout among healthcare workers. Prior research depicted how the pandemic affected all categories of healthcare workers, yet there is little evidence showing what specific factors hinder each type of employee. Methods: Employees from a large medical center in the Southeastern United States (US) (n=1,130) participated in an online survey, responding to a series of questions about their daily stressors, working conditions, and distress as measured by a 9-item Well-Being Index (WBI), and providing open-ended responses about additional stressors and positive changes in their work. With an analytic sample of 1,037, we used stepwise analysis for each employee group to identify which stressors have a significant association with their overall distress. Using a convergent mixed methods approach, we corroborate our quantitative findings with qualitative themes from the open-ended responses. Results: Among all types of employees i.e., physicians, nurses, Advanced Practice Providers (APPs), Clinical support staff and Non-clinical staff, moral distress was associated with higher WBI distress. Qualitative themes showed employees were mainly concerned with quality of and access to care for patients. Stress triggered by heavy workload in the setting of increased pandemic-related responsibilities and decreased personnel was associated with a high level of WBI distress among all types of employees, whereas other significant stressors differed by role. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic created a myriad of work and non-work-related stressors hindering all healthcare workers' psychological well-being differently. Working conditions and responsibilities for each role are unique. Institutional policies must contemplate the distinctiveness of stressors and distress across employee sub-groups to properly mitigate psychological distress. © 2022 Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy.","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-21-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare systems experienced significant challenges, including lower revenues from elective procedures, limited supplies, a massive influx of patients and psychologically distressed employees. National reports of well-being showed striking rates of burnout among healthcare workers. Prior research depicted how the pandemic affected all categories of healthcare workers, yet there is little evidence showing what specific factors hinder each type of employee. Methods: Employees from a large medical center in the Southeastern United States (US) (n=1,130) participated in an online survey, responding to a series of questions about their daily stressors, working conditions, and distress as measured by a 9-item Well-Being Index (WBI), and providing open-ended responses about additional stressors and positive changes in their work. With an analytic sample of 1,037, we used stepwise analysis for each employee group to identify which stressors have a significant association with their overall distress. Using a convergent mixed methods approach, we corroborate our quantitative findings with qualitative themes from the open-ended responses. Results: Among all types of employees i.e., physicians, nurses, Advanced Practice Providers (APPs), Clinical support staff and Non-clinical staff, moral distress was associated with higher WBI distress. Qualitative themes showed employees were mainly concerned with quality of and access to care for patients. Stress triggered by heavy workload in the setting of increased pandemic-related responsibilities and decreased personnel was associated with a high level of WBI distress among all types of employees, whereas other significant stressors differed by role. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic created a myriad of work and non-work-related stressors hindering all healthcare workers' psychological well-being differently. Working conditions and responsibilities for each role are unique. Institutional policies must contemplate the distinctiveness of stressors and distress across employee sub-groups to properly mitigate psychological distress. © 2022 Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球大流行中的独特压力源:一项关于COVID-19期间医疗团队成员痛苦的独特原因的混合方法研究
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,医疗保健系统经历了重大挑战,包括选择性手术收入下降、供应有限、大量患者涌入和心理困扰的员工。关于幸福感的国家报告显示,卫生保健工作者的倦怠率惊人。先前的研究描述了大流行如何影响所有类别的卫生保健工作者,但几乎没有证据表明哪些具体因素阻碍了每种类型的员工。方法:来自美国东南部一家大型医疗中心的员工(n= 1130)参与了一项在线调查,通过9项幸福感指数(WBI)来回答一系列关于日常压力源、工作条件和痛苦的问题,并就额外的压力源和工作中的积极变化提供开放式回答。我们选取了1037个分析样本,对每一组员工进行逐步分析,以确定哪些压力源与他们的整体压力有显著关联。使用收敛混合方法的方法,我们证实了我们的定量发现与定性主题从开放式的回应。结果:在所有类型的员工中,即医生、护士、高级执业医师(APPs)、临床支持人员和非临床人员,道德困扰与较高的WBI困扰相关。定性主题表明,员工主要关心的是病人护理的质量和可及性。在与大流行相关的责任增加和人员减少的情况下,繁重的工作量引发的压力与所有类型的雇员的高水平工作压力有关,而其他重要的压力因素因作用而异。结论:2019冠状病毒病大流行造成了无数工作和非工作压力源,不同程度地阻碍了所有医护人员的心理健康。每个角色的工作条件和职责都是独一无二的。机构政策必须考虑到压力源和压力在员工子群体中的特殊性,以适当减轻心理压力。©2022医院管理与卫生政策杂志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in hospital market concentration and profitability: the case of New Jersey COVID-19 outbreak and integration of social media in public health crisis communication: a case study of UMMC, Kuala Lumpur Spatial disparities in flood vulnerability in New York City Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth Impact of COVID-19 on operation room utilization efficiency and cardiac surgery care pathway: single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1