COVID-19 and medical educator perceptions: Sense-making during times of crisis

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES African Journal of Health Professions Education Pub Date : 2022-11-23 DOI:10.7196/ajhpe.2022.v14i4.1647
L. Govender, C. Jacobs
{"title":"COVID-19 and medical educator perceptions: Sense-making during times of crisis","authors":"L. Govender, C. Jacobs","doi":"10.7196/ajhpe.2022.v14i4.1647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nBackground. Although crises are generally considered uncommon, health professions education (HPE) literature gives evidence of repeated and ongoing crises. This has been most recently demonstrated by the global impact of COVID-19. Crisis management literature proposes that such recurrent crises are opportune moments for learning. While there has been much literature published that describes changes made to the format of HPE amid COVID-19, there has been little attention given to the perceptions of medical educators. Medical educators’ experiences may serve as a resource to uncover lessons that may have been learnt during this period. \nObjective. To address the gap in the literature, by analysing the perceptions of medical educators at the University of Cape Town (UCT) during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020-2021.Methods. A qualitative case-study approach was adopted. Rich data were collected from four medical educators using semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion, and then analysed using a reflexive thematic approach. \nResults. The data indicated that educators grappled with a multitude of struggles during the COVID-19 pandemic. These were analysed thematically as: tensions with technology, balancing expectations, and the distribution of support. However, surface-level challenges faced by educators seem to belie a much deeper personal struggle. \nConclusion. The data suggest that whether any learning occurs and what is learnt are embedded within the process of sense-making. If institutions of higher education aim to adopt proactive responses to crises, then further research – as well as support for these sense-making processes during crises – should form a critical part of overall institutional preparedness. \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":43683,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/ajhpe.2022.v14i4.1647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Although crises are generally considered uncommon, health professions education (HPE) literature gives evidence of repeated and ongoing crises. This has been most recently demonstrated by the global impact of COVID-19. Crisis management literature proposes that such recurrent crises are opportune moments for learning. While there has been much literature published that describes changes made to the format of HPE amid COVID-19, there has been little attention given to the perceptions of medical educators. Medical educators’ experiences may serve as a resource to uncover lessons that may have been learnt during this period. Objective. To address the gap in the literature, by analysing the perceptions of medical educators at the University of Cape Town (UCT) during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020-2021.Methods. A qualitative case-study approach was adopted. Rich data were collected from four medical educators using semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion, and then analysed using a reflexive thematic approach. Results. The data indicated that educators grappled with a multitude of struggles during the COVID-19 pandemic. These were analysed thematically as: tensions with technology, balancing expectations, and the distribution of support. However, surface-level challenges faced by educators seem to belie a much deeper personal struggle. Conclusion. The data suggest that whether any learning occurs and what is learnt are embedded within the process of sense-making. If institutions of higher education aim to adopt proactive responses to crises, then further research – as well as support for these sense-making processes during crises – should form a critical part of overall institutional preparedness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎与医学教育家的认知:危机时期的意义
背景尽管危机通常被认为是不常见的,但卫生专业教育(HPE)文献提供了反复和持续危机的证据。新冠肺炎的全球影响最近证明了这一点。危机管理文献提出,这种反复发生的危机是学习的好时机。尽管已经发表了许多文献来描述新冠肺炎期间HPE格式的变化,但很少关注医学教育工作者的看法。医学教育工作者的经验可以作为一种资源来揭示这一时期可能学到的教训。客观的为了解决文献中的差距,通过分析开普敦大学(UCT)医学教育工作者在2020-2021年新冠肺炎大流行期间的看法。方法采用定性案例研究方法。通过半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论,从四位医学教育工作者那里收集了丰富的数据,然后使用反射式主题方法进行分析。后果数据表明,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,教育工作者面临着诸多困难。这些问题按主题分析为:与技术的紧张关系、平衡期望和支持的分配。然而,教育工作者面临的表面挑战似乎掩盖了更深层次的个人斗争。结论数据表明,是否发生了任何学习以及所学到的东西都嵌入了意义形成的过程中。如果高等教育机构的目标是对危机采取积极主动的应对措施,那么进一步的研究——以及在危机期间对这些决策过程的支持——应该成为机构整体准备的关键部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Health Professions Education
African Journal of Health Professions Education HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a decentralised clinical training programme (DCTP) at a university of technology in South Africa: Implications for health science education and clinical practice How do medical students without formal training in empathy development understand empathy in the context of patient care? Perceptions of staff and students of the role of clinical simulation on students’ ability to perform academically Surgical videos used for face-to-face and virtual oral assessment: experiences of examiners and trainees. Exploring student midwives’ experiences regarding completion of the midwifery register at a nursing college in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1