Small unmanned aerial systems comparative analysis for the application to coastal erosion monitoring

GeoResJ Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.grj.2017.05.001
A. Clark
{"title":"Small unmanned aerial systems comparative analysis for the application to coastal erosion monitoring","authors":"A. Clark","doi":"10.1016/j.grj.2017.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The low operating cost and flexibility of sUAS enables repeated surveys of study sites to monitor annual coastal changes and investigate the impacts of individual storms. The majority of damage along the coast of Prince Edward Island occurs during storm events which are expected to increase in frequency and severity and presents one of the biggest challenges faced by residents due to climate change. This study completes a comparative analysis between a fixed wing and quadcopter unmanned aerial system. The impact of using ground control points during image processing resulted in an average image marker to ground control point coordinates difference of 0.1<!--> <!-->m and 0.03<!--> <span>m for the fixed wing and quadcopter respectively. Coastal delineation from orthomosaics compared to a ground truth coastal trace using survey grade GPS resulted in an average difference of 0.25</span> <!-->m and 0.21<!--> <!-->m for the fixed wing and quadcopter systems respectively. Elevation comparison of the resulting digital surface models to a ground truth GPS survey resulted in -0.117<!--> <!-->m average difference for the fixed wing and 0.0224<!--> <span>m average difference for the quadcopter. Furthermore, consideration of cost, time, and ambient factors are addressed. Finally, sUAS technology is seen to have the potential to revolutionize the field of environmental monitoring in low capacity regions, building local knowledge capital for better planning and adapting to the impacts of climate change.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":93099,"journal":{"name":"GeoResJ","volume":"13 ","pages":"Pages 175-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.grj.2017.05.001","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeoResJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214242816300729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The low operating cost and flexibility of sUAS enables repeated surveys of study sites to monitor annual coastal changes and investigate the impacts of individual storms. The majority of damage along the coast of Prince Edward Island occurs during storm events which are expected to increase in frequency and severity and presents one of the biggest challenges faced by residents due to climate change. This study completes a comparative analysis between a fixed wing and quadcopter unmanned aerial system. The impact of using ground control points during image processing resulted in an average image marker to ground control point coordinates difference of 0.1 m and 0.03 m for the fixed wing and quadcopter respectively. Coastal delineation from orthomosaics compared to a ground truth coastal trace using survey grade GPS resulted in an average difference of 0.25 m and 0.21 m for the fixed wing and quadcopter systems respectively. Elevation comparison of the resulting digital surface models to a ground truth GPS survey resulted in -0.117 m average difference for the fixed wing and 0.0224 m average difference for the quadcopter. Furthermore, consideration of cost, time, and ambient factors are addressed. Finally, sUAS technology is seen to have the potential to revolutionize the field of environmental monitoring in low capacity regions, building local knowledge capital for better planning and adapting to the impacts of climate change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小型无人机系统在海岸侵蚀监测中的应用对比分析
sUAS的低运行成本和灵活性使其能够对研究地点进行重复调查,以监测年度沿海变化并调查单个风暴的影响。爱德华王子岛沿岸的大部分破坏发生在风暴事件期间,预计风暴事件的频率和严重程度将增加,并成为气候变化导致居民面临的最大挑战之一。本研究完成了固定翼和四轴飞行器无人机系统的比较分析。在图像处理过程中使用地面控制点的影响导致固定翼和四轴飞行器图像标记点与地面控制点的平均坐标差分别为0.1 m和0.03 m。与使用测量级GPS的地面真实海岸轨迹相比,固定翼和四轴飞行器系统的海岸线描绘平均差异分别为0.25米和0.21米。将所得的数字地面模型与地面真实GPS测量进行高程比较,固定翼飞机的平均差值为-0.117 m,四轴飞行器的平均差值为0.0224 m。此外,还考虑了成本、时间和环境因素。最后,sUAS技术被认为有可能彻底改变低能力地区的环境监测领域,为更好的规划和适应气候变化的影响建立当地知识资本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Soil legacy data rescue via GlobalSoilMap and other international and national initiatives Design and development of a generic spatial decision support system, based on artificial intelligence and multicriteria decision analysis A re-evaluation of the basal age in the DSDP hole at Site 534, Central Atlantic The application of machine learning for evaluating anthropogenic versus natural climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1