Is it time to reboot welfare economics? Overview

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Fiscal Studies Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1111/1475-5890.12334
Diane Coyle, Mark Fabian, Eric Beinhocker, Tim Besley, Margaret Stevens
{"title":"Is it time to reboot welfare economics? Overview","authors":"Diane Coyle,&nbsp;Mark Fabian,&nbsp;Eric Beinhocker,&nbsp;Tim Besley,&nbsp;Margaret Stevens","doi":"10.1111/1475-5890.12334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The contributions of economists have long included both positive explanations of how economic systems work and normative recommendations for how they could and should work better. In recent decades, economics has taken a strong empirical turn as well as having a greater appreciation of the importance of the complexities of real-world human behaviour, institutions, the strengths and failures of markets, and interlinkages with other systems, including politics, technology, culture and the environment. This shift has also brought greater relevance and pragmatism to normative economics. While this shift towards evidence and pragmatism has been welcome, it does not in itself answer the core question of what exactly constitutes ‘better’, and for whom, and how to manage inevitable conflicts and trade-offs in society. These have long been the core concerns of welfare economics. Yet, in the 1980s and 1990s, debates on welfare economics seemed to have become marginalised. The articles in this <i>Fiscal Studies</i> symposium engage with the question of how to revive normative questions as a central issue in economic scholarship.</p>","PeriodicalId":51602,"journal":{"name":"Fiscal Studies","volume":"44 2","pages":"109-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-5890.12334","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiscal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-5890.12334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contributions of economists have long included both positive explanations of how economic systems work and normative recommendations for how they could and should work better. In recent decades, economics has taken a strong empirical turn as well as having a greater appreciation of the importance of the complexities of real-world human behaviour, institutions, the strengths and failures of markets, and interlinkages with other systems, including politics, technology, culture and the environment. This shift has also brought greater relevance and pragmatism to normative economics. While this shift towards evidence and pragmatism has been welcome, it does not in itself answer the core question of what exactly constitutes ‘better’, and for whom, and how to manage inevitable conflicts and trade-offs in society. These have long been the core concerns of welfare economics. Yet, in the 1980s and 1990s, debates on welfare economics seemed to have become marginalised. The articles in this Fiscal Studies symposium engage with the question of how to revive normative questions as a central issue in economic scholarship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现在是重启福利经济学的时候了吗?概述
长期以来,经济学家的贡献既包括对经济系统如何运作的积极解释,也包括对经济系统如何能够和应该更好地运作的规范性建议。近几十年来,经济学有了强有力的实证转向,同时对现实世界人类行为、制度、市场的优势和失败以及与其他系统(包括政治、技术、文化和环境)的相互联系的复杂性的重要性有了更大的认识。这种转变也给规范经济学带来了更大的相关性和实用主义。虽然这种向证据和实用主义的转变受到欢迎,但它本身并没有回答“更好”的核心问题,即究竟什么是“更好”,为谁服务,以及如何管理社会中不可避免的冲突和权衡。这些长期以来一直是福利经济学的核心问题。然而,在20世纪80年代和90年代,关于福利经济学的辩论似乎被边缘化了。本次财政研究研讨会的文章探讨了如何将规范性问题作为经济学术的核心问题来复兴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fiscal Studies
Fiscal Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
1.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The Institute for Fiscal Studies publishes the journal Fiscal Studies, which serves as a bridge between academic research and policy. This esteemed journal, established in 1979, has gained global recognition for its publication of high-quality and original research papers. The articles, authored by prominent academics, policymakers, and practitioners, are presented in an accessible format, ensuring a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Equally poorer: inequality and the Greek debt crisis Did Belgium withstand the storm of rising inequalities? Income inequality in Belgium, 1985–2020 What lies behind France's low level of income inequality?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1