On Nancy, Hölderlin, the Fragmentary and the One

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES Parallax Pub Date : 2021-05-21 DOI:10.1080/13534645.2021.1896086
Charles de Roche
{"title":"On Nancy, Hölderlin, the Fragmentary and the One","authors":"Charles de Roche","doi":"10.1080/13534645.2021.1896086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though his texts do not refer to the poet as frequently as is the case with Nancy’s friend Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, the importance of Friedrich H€ olderlin’s writing and thought for Nancy’s philosophy can hardly be overrated. As the present essay attempts to show, it is precisely the relation between writing and thought that is at stake in the two authors’ intertextual relation. To that end, the essay will deal with two of Nancy’s texts explicitly concerned with H€ olderlin, ‘Hyperion’s Joy’ and ‘The Poet’s Calculation’, as well as with the essay ‘Art, a Fragment’ from The Sense of the World. The reason for the inclusion of the latter text, which contains only one passing reference to H€ olderlin in a footnote, from the perspective of the present essay is, again, twofold: on the one hand, it can be shown that the (or ‘a’) specifically Nancean conception of the philosophical problem of unity lies at the core of his interpretation of H€ olderlin’s poetics as well as of Nancy’s own conception of the fragmentary. On the other hand, this insight invites the attempt to fill an obvious gap left by the two essays on H€ olderlin: while these are almost exclusively concerned with the philosophical implications of H€ olderlin’s poetics and – to a lesser extent, and with a stronger accent on the novel Hyperion than on the poetry – his literary writings, it appears promising to approach H€ olderlin’s specific practice of fragmentary writing, characteristic of the decisive period of his work between 1802 and 1806, in the light of Nancy’s theory of the fragmentary. The attempt to interpret H€ olderlin’s writings through and as philosophical thought, as practised in Nancy’s essays, could thus be supplemented, chiastically as it were, by highlighting the latter’s philosophical conception of the fragmentary through the study of the poet’s concrete literary and artistic practice. Of course, this cannot be done extensively within the scope of the present essay; I shall restrict myself in this respect to two examples taken from the Homburger Folioheft, a manuscript collection of fragments, and drafts of H€ olderlin’s planned cycle of poems in free rhythm, the Vaterl€ andische Ges€ ange.","PeriodicalId":46204,"journal":{"name":"Parallax","volume":"26 1","pages":"400 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13534645.2021.1896086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parallax","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2021.1896086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even though his texts do not refer to the poet as frequently as is the case with Nancy’s friend Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, the importance of Friedrich H€ olderlin’s writing and thought for Nancy’s philosophy can hardly be overrated. As the present essay attempts to show, it is precisely the relation between writing and thought that is at stake in the two authors’ intertextual relation. To that end, the essay will deal with two of Nancy’s texts explicitly concerned with H€ olderlin, ‘Hyperion’s Joy’ and ‘The Poet’s Calculation’, as well as with the essay ‘Art, a Fragment’ from The Sense of the World. The reason for the inclusion of the latter text, which contains only one passing reference to H€ olderlin in a footnote, from the perspective of the present essay is, again, twofold: on the one hand, it can be shown that the (or ‘a’) specifically Nancean conception of the philosophical problem of unity lies at the core of his interpretation of H€ olderlin’s poetics as well as of Nancy’s own conception of the fragmentary. On the other hand, this insight invites the attempt to fill an obvious gap left by the two essays on H€ olderlin: while these are almost exclusively concerned with the philosophical implications of H€ olderlin’s poetics and – to a lesser extent, and with a stronger accent on the novel Hyperion than on the poetry – his literary writings, it appears promising to approach H€ olderlin’s specific practice of fragmentary writing, characteristic of the decisive period of his work between 1802 and 1806, in the light of Nancy’s theory of the fragmentary. The attempt to interpret H€ olderlin’s writings through and as philosophical thought, as practised in Nancy’s essays, could thus be supplemented, chiastically as it were, by highlighting the latter’s philosophical conception of the fragmentary through the study of the poet’s concrete literary and artistic practice. Of course, this cannot be done extensively within the scope of the present essay; I shall restrict myself in this respect to two examples taken from the Homburger Folioheft, a manuscript collection of fragments, and drafts of H€ olderlin’s planned cycle of poems in free rhythm, the Vaterl€ andische Ges€ ange.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于南希Hölderlin,零碎的和唯一的
尽管他的文本不像南希的朋友菲利普·拉库·拉巴特那样频繁地提到这位诗人,但弗里德里希·H·奥尔德林的写作和思想对南希哲学的重要性怎么评价都不为过。正如本文所试图表明的那样,在两位作者的互文关系中,写作和思想之间的关系正处于危险之中。为此,这篇文章将处理南希的两篇文章,《海伯利安的喜悦》和《诗人的计算》,以及《世界感》中的文章《艺术,一个片段》。从本文的角度来看,纳入后一文本的原因是双重的:一方面,可以看出,他对奥尔德林诗学的阐释,以及南希自己的碎片概念的核心,是(或“a”)特别是南希关于统一的哲学问题的概念。另一方面,这种见解促使人们试图填补这两篇关于H€olderlin的文章留下的明显空白:虽然这些文章几乎完全关注H€oldermin诗学的哲学含义,而且在较小程度上,对小说《Hyperion》的强调比对诗歌的强调更为强烈,但他的文学作品,根据南希的碎片理论,探讨H€olderlin的碎片写作的具体实践似乎很有希望,这是他1802年至1806年作品决定性时期的特征。因此,试图通过南希的散文中所实践的哲学思想来解读H€olderlin的作品,可以通过研究诗人的具体文学和艺术实践来突出后者对零碎的哲学概念,从而对其进行补充。当然,这不能在本文的范围内广泛地进行;在这方面,我将把自己限制在两个例子上,这两个例子取自Homburger Folioheft,一个碎片手稿集,以及H€olderlin计划的自由节奏诗歌循环的草稿,Vaterl€andische Ges€ange。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parallax
Parallax Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1995, parallax has established an international reputation for bringing together outstanding new work in cultural studies, critical theory and philosophy. parallax publishes themed issues that aim to provoke exploratory, interdisciplinary thinking and response. Each issue of parallax provides a forum for a wide spectrum of perspectives on a topical question or concern. parallax will be of interest to those working in cultural studies, critical theory, cultural history, philosophy, gender studies, queer theory, post-colonial theory, English and comparative literature, aesthetics, art history and visual cultures.
期刊最新文献
Restarting The Prelude Suddenly Beckett No Telling, Beginning with Gravity’s Rainbow Rousseau’s Shameless Beginnings Delayed Origins, Initial Inhibitions: The Beginnings of Fatherlandish Song and the Task of Answering the Mother in Hölderlin’s Am Quell der Donau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1