The legislature as target and mediator of ensuing outcomes during social emergencies: revisiting Nigeria’s #EndSARS protest

Bo Ajibola, T. I. Odeyemi
{"title":"The legislature as target and mediator of ensuing outcomes during social emergencies: revisiting Nigeria’s #EndSARS protest","authors":"Bo Ajibola, T. I. Odeyemi","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2022.2093496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent times, discontented populations have increasingly leveraged public demonstrations and protests in expressing grievances and in making claims on political regimes. These demonstrations are sometimes not devoid of violence and destructions – incidences against which institutions of the state are arguably not immunised. At the inception of the 2020 #EndSARS protests against police brutality in Nigeria, legislative institutions, as linkers between government and governed, functioned as arguably the protests' primary conduit of communication to state actors, as protesters held sit-ins in front of legislatures and sought audiences with legislators. Paradoxically, at the climax of the protest, platforms of political representation, including constituency offices of legislators, were violently targeted by protesters. Between both endpoints – inception and climax – were exchanges between the legislature, executive and protest leaders in steering the direction of the protests. Hence, the legislative institution was at the centrepiece of the protests – a target by protesters and an admissible mediator of outcomes. Focusing on Nigeria's national and subnational legislatures, and drawing on documented reports, we answer the key questions: what explains protesters' targeting of legislative institutions during demonstrations and in what ways do legislative institutions mediate protest prospects and progression? Our analysis of the dynamics of legislature experiences during social emergencies induced by social movements leads us to a political neighbours hypothesis which underscores the targeting of legislative institutions based on their close proximities – by location and responsibility – to the people they represent.","PeriodicalId":42455,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2093496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent times, discontented populations have increasingly leveraged public demonstrations and protests in expressing grievances and in making claims on political regimes. These demonstrations are sometimes not devoid of violence and destructions – incidences against which institutions of the state are arguably not immunised. At the inception of the 2020 #EndSARS protests against police brutality in Nigeria, legislative institutions, as linkers between government and governed, functioned as arguably the protests' primary conduit of communication to state actors, as protesters held sit-ins in front of legislatures and sought audiences with legislators. Paradoxically, at the climax of the protest, platforms of political representation, including constituency offices of legislators, were violently targeted by protesters. Between both endpoints – inception and climax – were exchanges between the legislature, executive and protest leaders in steering the direction of the protests. Hence, the legislative institution was at the centrepiece of the protests – a target by protesters and an admissible mediator of outcomes. Focusing on Nigeria's national and subnational legislatures, and drawing on documented reports, we answer the key questions: what explains protesters' targeting of legislative institutions during demonstrations and in what ways do legislative institutions mediate protest prospects and progression? Our analysis of the dynamics of legislature experiences during social emergencies induced by social movements leads us to a political neighbours hypothesis which underscores the targeting of legislative institutions based on their close proximities – by location and responsibility – to the people they represent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立法机构是社会紧急情况下随之而来结果的目标和调解人:重温尼日利亚的#EndSARS抗议活动
近年来,不满的民众越来越多地利用公众示威和抗议来表达不满和对政治制度提出要求。这些示威活动有时并非没有暴力和破坏——可以说,国家机构无法对这些事件免疫。在2020年反对尼日利亚警察暴行#EndSARS抗议活动开始之初,立法机构作为政府与被统治者之间的纽带,可以说是抗议活动与国家行为体沟通的主要渠道,抗议者在立法机构前静坐,寻求与立法者会面。矛盾的是,在抗议的高潮,政治代表的平台,包括议员的选区办公室,被抗议者暴力攻击。在起始点和高潮点之间,是立法机关、行政部门和抗议领导人在指导抗议方向方面的交流。因此,立法机构是抗议活动的核心——既是抗议者的目标,又是结果的可接受的调解人。聚焦于尼日利亚的国家和地方立法机构,并借鉴文献报告,我们回答了关键问题:示威期间抗议者针对立法机构的原因是什么?立法机构以何种方式调解抗议的前景和进展?我们对由社会运动引起的社会紧急情况期间立法机构经验的动态进行的分析使我们得出了一个政治邻邦假说,该假说强调立法机构的目标是基于它们在地理位置和责任方面与它们所代表的人民的接近程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.
期刊最新文献
Regulatory capture in energy sector: evidence from Indonesia Operationalisation of legislation and the will of legislators in the judgments of international courts of war crimes and post-war recovery Observing law-making patterns in times of crisis Exploring the relationship between law and governance: a proposal Governing during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1