The Role of HbA1c in Severity and Mortality Rate of ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction for Hospitalized Libyan Non-Diabetic Patients

H. K. Altalhi
{"title":"The Role of HbA1c in Severity and Mortality Rate of ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction for Hospitalized Libyan Non-Diabetic Patients","authors":"H. K. Altalhi","doi":"10.19080/crdoj.2019.12.555840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) is directly related to the quality of glucose control in diabetic patient. Additionally, diabetes is associated with increased mortality following acute myocardial infarction compared to general population. Objectives: To evaluate the association of HbA1c level and severity of CAD, and outcome of non-diabetic patient with STEMI in our hospital. Patients and Methods: 60 consecutives non-diabetic patient with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction were treated with thrombolytic therapy included in the present prospective study. Blood glucose and HbA1c level of all patients were measured within 3 hours of admission. Patient were divided in to 3 groups according to HbA1c level: with cut-off 6.5% as diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus according to (American diabetes association) group (1) 6.5%, group (2) 6.5 to 8.5%, group (3) 8.5% and above. In hospital. mortality and morbidities of acute STEMI were compared between groups. Results: The mean age was 63±15 year and mean body mass index was 26. 6±6 kg/m², 24 patients (40%) had history of hypertension, 27 patients (45%) of dyslipidemia, 36 patients (60%) were smoker. We found 45 patients with HbA1c ≤ 6 5%, 5 patients with HbA1c 6.5 -8.5 %, 10 patients with HbA1c ≥ 8.5%. There was strong correlation between admission of HbA1c and admission glucose level (P< 0.001). Infarct size as measured by peak creatinin kinase, was not correlated with HbA1c level. Conclusions: HbA1c is an important risk marker in the absence of history of diabetes mellitus in patients with AMI. The optimal management in these patients may contribute in decrease hospital mortality.","PeriodicalId":92021,"journal":{"name":"Current research in diabetes & obesity journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in diabetes & obesity journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/crdoj.2019.12.555840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) is directly related to the quality of glucose control in diabetic patient. Additionally, diabetes is associated with increased mortality following acute myocardial infarction compared to general population. Objectives: To evaluate the association of HbA1c level and severity of CAD, and outcome of non-diabetic patient with STEMI in our hospital. Patients and Methods: 60 consecutives non-diabetic patient with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction were treated with thrombolytic therapy included in the present prospective study. Blood glucose and HbA1c level of all patients were measured within 3 hours of admission. Patient were divided in to 3 groups according to HbA1c level: with cut-off 6.5% as diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus according to (American diabetes association) group (1) 6.5%, group (2) 6.5 to 8.5%, group (3) 8.5% and above. In hospital. mortality and morbidities of acute STEMI were compared between groups. Results: The mean age was 63±15 year and mean body mass index was 26. 6±6 kg/m², 24 patients (40%) had history of hypertension, 27 patients (45%) of dyslipidemia, 36 patients (60%) were smoker. We found 45 patients with HbA1c ≤ 6 5%, 5 patients with HbA1c 6.5 -8.5 %, 10 patients with HbA1c ≥ 8.5%. There was strong correlation between admission of HbA1c and admission glucose level (P< 0.001). Infarct size as measured by peak creatinin kinase, was not correlated with HbA1c level. Conclusions: HbA1c is an important risk marker in the absence of history of diabetes mellitus in patients with AMI. The optimal management in these patients may contribute in decrease hospital mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HbA1c在利比亚非糖尿病住院患者ST段抬高型心肌梗死严重程度和死亡率中的作用
背景:糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的严重程度与血糖控制质量直接相关。此外,与一般人群相比,糖尿病与急性心肌梗死后死亡率增加有关。目的:探讨我院非糖尿病STEMI患者HbA1c水平与冠心病严重程度及预后的关系。患者和方法:本前瞻性研究对60例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的非糖尿病患者进行溶栓治疗。所有患者均在入院3小时内测量血糖和HbA1c水平。根据HbA1c水平将患者分为3组:根据美国糖尿病协会(American diabetes association)的标准,以6.5%作为糖尿病的诊断标准(cut-off 6.5%)组(1)6.5%,组(2)6.5 ~ 8.5%,组(3)8.5%及以上。在医院里。比较两组间急性STEMI的死亡率和发病率。结果:患者平均年龄63±15岁,平均体重指数26。6±6 kg/m²,有高血压史24例(40%),血脂异常27例(45%),吸烟36例(60%)。HbA1c≤6.5%的患者45例,HbA1c 6.5 - 8.5%的患者5例,HbA1c≥8.5%的患者10例。入院时HbA1c与入院时血糖水平有很强的相关性(P< 0.001)。通过峰值肌凝素激酶测量的梗死面积与HbA1c水平无关。结论:在无糖尿病史的AMI患者中,HbA1c是一个重要的危险指标。对这些患者的最佳管理可能有助于降低住院死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Differential Inhibition of Aldose Reductase, Implicated in Secondary Complications in Diabetes Comparing Anxiety and Professional Efficiency Among Normal- and Over -Weight Medical Staff During the Covid-19 Outbreak: A Case-Control Study Can Alcohol and Obesity be Considered Risk Factors for Diabetes Mellitus? (environmental study) The Association Between Body Mass Index and Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Across Eight Countries: A Literature Review Implication of Mode of Consumption of Allium cepa L. (Onion) on Lipoglycemic and Anthropometric Impacts in Diabetic Rats: A Function of Choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1