Supplemental calcium and vitamin D and long-term mortality in aortic stenosis

Nicholas Kassis, E. Hariri, A. Karrthik, K. Ahuja, H. Layoun, Anas M. Saad, M. Gad, Manpreet Kaur, Najdat Bazarbashi, B. Griffin, Z. Popović, S. Harb, M. Desai, S. Kapadia
{"title":"Supplemental calcium and vitamin D and long-term mortality in aortic stenosis","authors":"Nicholas Kassis, E. Hariri, A. Karrthik, K. Ahuja, H. Layoun, Anas M. Saad, M. Gad, Manpreet Kaur, Najdat Bazarbashi, B. Griffin, Z. Popović, S. Harb, M. Desai, S. Kapadia","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Calcium metabolism has long been implicated in aortic stenosis (AS). Studies assessing the long-term safety of oral calcium and/or vitamin D in AS are scarce yet imperative given the rising use among an elderly population prone to deficiency. We sought to identify the associations between supplemental calcium and vitamin D with mortality and progression of AS. Methods In this retrospective longitudinal study, patients aged ≥60 years with mild-moderate native AS were selected from the Cleveland Clinic Echocardiography Database from 2008 to 2016 and followed until 2018. Groups were stratified into no supplementation, supplementation with vitamin D alone and supplementation with calcium±vitamin D. The primary outcomes were mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV) and aortic valve replacement (AVR), and the secondary outcome was AS progression by aortic valve area and peak/mean gradients. Results Of 2657 patients (mean age 74 years, 42% women) followed over a median duration of 69 months, 1292 (49%) did not supplement, 332 (12%) took vitamin D alone and 1033 (39%) supplemented with calcium±vitamin D. Calcium±vitamin D supplementation was associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (absolute rate (AR)=43.0/1000 person-years; HR=1.31, 95% CI (1.07 to 1.62); p=0.009), CV mortality (AR=13.7/1000 person-years; HR=2.0, 95% CI (1.31 to 3.07); p=0.001) and AVR (AR=88.2/1000 person-years; HR=1.48, 95% CI (1.24 to 1.78); p<0.001). Any supplementation was not associated with longitudinal change in AS parameters in a linear mixed-effects model. Conclusions Supplemental calcium with or without vitamin D is associated with lower survival and greater AVR in elderly patients with mild-moderate AS.","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"964 - 972"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective Calcium metabolism has long been implicated in aortic stenosis (AS). Studies assessing the long-term safety of oral calcium and/or vitamin D in AS are scarce yet imperative given the rising use among an elderly population prone to deficiency. We sought to identify the associations between supplemental calcium and vitamin D with mortality and progression of AS. Methods In this retrospective longitudinal study, patients aged ≥60 years with mild-moderate native AS were selected from the Cleveland Clinic Echocardiography Database from 2008 to 2016 and followed until 2018. Groups were stratified into no supplementation, supplementation with vitamin D alone and supplementation with calcium±vitamin D. The primary outcomes were mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV) and aortic valve replacement (AVR), and the secondary outcome was AS progression by aortic valve area and peak/mean gradients. Results Of 2657 patients (mean age 74 years, 42% women) followed over a median duration of 69 months, 1292 (49%) did not supplement, 332 (12%) took vitamin D alone and 1033 (39%) supplemented with calcium±vitamin D. Calcium±vitamin D supplementation was associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (absolute rate (AR)=43.0/1000 person-years; HR=1.31, 95% CI (1.07 to 1.62); p=0.009), CV mortality (AR=13.7/1000 person-years; HR=2.0, 95% CI (1.31 to 3.07); p=0.001) and AVR (AR=88.2/1000 person-years; HR=1.48, 95% CI (1.24 to 1.78); p<0.001). Any supplementation was not associated with longitudinal change in AS parameters in a linear mixed-effects model. Conclusions Supplemental calcium with or without vitamin D is associated with lower survival and greater AVR in elderly patients with mild-moderate AS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充钙和维生素D与主动脉瓣狭窄的长期死亡率
目的长期以来,钙代谢一直与主动脉狭窄有关。评估口服钙和/或维生素D治疗AS的长期安全性的研究很少,但鉴于易缺乏的老年人群中钙和/和维生素D的使用量不断增加,这一研究势在必行。我们试图确定补充钙和维生素D与AS死亡率和进展之间的关系。方法在这项回顾性纵向研究中,从2008年至2016年克利夫兰诊所超声心动图数据库中选择年龄≥60岁的轻度至中度本土AS患者,并随访至2018年。各组被分为不补充、单独补充维生素D和补充钙±维生素D。主要结果是死亡率(全因、心血管(CV)和非心血管)和主动脉瓣置换术(AVR),次要结果是主动脉瓣面积和峰值/平均梯度的AS进展。结果2657名患者(平均年龄74岁,42%为女性)中位随访69个月,其中1292名(49%)不补充维生素D,332名(12%)单独服用维生素D,1033名(39%)补充钙±维生素D;HR=1.31,95%可信区间(1.07-1.62);p=0.009),CV死亡率(AR=13.7/1000人年;HR=2.0,95%CI(1.31-3.07);p=0.001)和AVR(AR=88/2/1000人年;HR=1.48,95%CI(1.24-1.78);p<0.001)。在线性混合效应模型中,任何补充都与AS参数的纵向变化无关。结论在轻度-中度AS的老年患者中,添加或不添加维生素D的钙与较低的生存率和较大的AVR相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A retrospective review of empiric acyclovir prescribing practices for suspected viral central nervous system infections: A single-centre study. Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment. Socioeconomic status and entrepreneurial networking responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Cardiac microstructural alterations measured by echocardiography identify sex-specific risk for heart failure. Aspirin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1