The ‘broad centrist’ political parties and the first provisional government, 3 march – 5 may 1917

IF 0.2 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Revolutionary Russia Pub Date : 2020-02-13 DOI:10.1080/09546545.2020.1808318
Ian D. Thatcher
{"title":"The ‘broad centrist’ political parties and the first provisional government, 3 march – 5 may 1917","authors":"Ian D. Thatcher","doi":"10.1080/09546545.2020.1808318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is the first detailed examination of the relationship between the political parties of the ‘broad centrist coalition’ and the first Provisional Government. It challenges the historiography that issues from P. N. Miliukov and A. I. Guchkov that the Provisional Government could not rule because of dual power, in which the executive lacked any support and was a prisoner of the Petrograd Soviet. The evidence presented here demonstrates that the policy of support for the Provisional Government ‘in so far as … ’ the executive pursued a progressive programme was (a) quite common at the time and (b) did not exclude recognition of the Provisional Government as the legitimate and sole power. The article details the range of interaction between the political parties and the Provisional Government, focusing on the ways in which the parties promoted the Provisional Government and acted as a critical friend over policy. Finally, the article argues that in this early period the parties changed from having no influence over the formation of the Provisional Government to being key players in the outcome of the first reshuffle of the executive following Guchkov’s resignation, which marked the triumph of a more left policy backed by existing ministers and the political parties.","PeriodicalId":42121,"journal":{"name":"Revolutionary Russia","volume":"33 1","pages":"197 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09546545.2020.1808318","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revolutionary Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546545.2020.1808318","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is the first detailed examination of the relationship between the political parties of the ‘broad centrist coalition’ and the first Provisional Government. It challenges the historiography that issues from P. N. Miliukov and A. I. Guchkov that the Provisional Government could not rule because of dual power, in which the executive lacked any support and was a prisoner of the Petrograd Soviet. The evidence presented here demonstrates that the policy of support for the Provisional Government ‘in so far as … ’ the executive pursued a progressive programme was (a) quite common at the time and (b) did not exclude recognition of the Provisional Government as the legitimate and sole power. The article details the range of interaction between the political parties and the Provisional Government, focusing on the ways in which the parties promoted the Provisional Government and acted as a critical friend over policy. Finally, the article argues that in this early period the parties changed from having no influence over the formation of the Provisional Government to being key players in the outcome of the first reshuffle of the executive following Guchkov’s resignation, which marked the triumph of a more left policy backed by existing ministers and the political parties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1917年3月3日至5月5日,“广泛中间派”政党和第一临时政府
这篇文章首次详细考察了“广泛的中间派联盟”政党与第一届临时政府之间的关系。它挑战了P.N.Miliukov和A.I.Guchkov提出的史学问题,即临时政府由于双重权力而无法统治,在双重权力中,行政部门缺乏任何支持,是彼得格勒苏维埃的俘虏。这里提供的证据表明,支持临时政府的政策“ … ’ 行政部门推行的进步方案(a)在当时相当普遍,(b)并不排除承认临时政府是合法和唯一的权力。这篇文章详细介绍了各政党与临时政府之间的互动范围,重点是各政党如何推动临时政府并在政策上充当关键的朋友。最后,文章认为,在这一早期,各政党从对临时政府的组建没有影响力转变为古奇科夫辞职后第一次行政部门改组结果的关键参与者,这标志着由现有部长和政党支持的更左翼政策的胜利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
A Re-Examination of Russian Harvest Statistics for the End of the Nineteenth Century Islamic Leadership and the State in Eurasia Russian Pogroms and Jewish Revolution, 1905. Class, Ethnicity, Autocracy in the First Russian Revolution Foreign Business and Revolution: The British Engineering Company of Russia and Siberia, 1918–1921 Recent French Historiography and the Legacy of the Revolutions of 1917
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1