M. Silva, Amélia Fernandes, Ana Rita Pereira, Sofia Madanelo, Tatiana Clemêncio, P. Ferreira
{"title":"Awareness towards the main ILD among primary care physicians","authors":"M. Silva, Amélia Fernandes, Ana Rita Pereira, Sofia Madanelo, Tatiana Clemêncio, P. Ferreira","doi":"10.4081/mrm.2022.848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) comprise a group of multiple entities sharing some clinical, functional, and radiological similarities. In many countries primary care setting has been devoid of pre- and post-graduate educational interventions focused on basic knowledge on ILD. This, along with usual nonspecificity of symptoms at presentation, may contribute to diagnostic delay in this disease setting. Methods We designed a study questionnaire to assess the level of awareness on basic diagnostic and management aspects of core ILDs – idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis, connective tissue disease related-ILD, and drug-induced ILD - among primary care physicians (GPs) from five “ACeS Baixo Vouga” health centres and to perceive possible weaknesses. Differences in awareness between GPs under 45 and over 45 yearsold were also assessed. Results Globally, 69% of questions were correctly answered but only 21.9% of GPs considered to have a satisfactory self-perceived level of knowledge on ILD. Except sarcoidosis (p=0.017) and some isolated questions on other diseases, no significant differences were found between physicians below 45 years and above. Though, there was a trend to higher awareness in the younger group. The best awareness was seen in sarcoidosis. IPF questions had the worst performance and only 48.5% of GPs recognized the importance of velcro-type crackles in suggesting a possible diagnosis. Conclusion Specific attention should be devoted to educational interventions directed to GPs on basic notions on the main ILDs. This could improve the usual diagnostic delay in many ILDs, as a timely diagnosis is essential for an early treatment and prolonged patient survival.","PeriodicalId":51135,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mrm.2022.848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) comprise a group of multiple entities sharing some clinical, functional, and radiological similarities. In many countries primary care setting has been devoid of pre- and post-graduate educational interventions focused on basic knowledge on ILD. This, along with usual nonspecificity of symptoms at presentation, may contribute to diagnostic delay in this disease setting. Methods We designed a study questionnaire to assess the level of awareness on basic diagnostic and management aspects of core ILDs – idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis, connective tissue disease related-ILD, and drug-induced ILD - among primary care physicians (GPs) from five “ACeS Baixo Vouga” health centres and to perceive possible weaknesses. Differences in awareness between GPs under 45 and over 45 yearsold were also assessed. Results Globally, 69% of questions were correctly answered but only 21.9% of GPs considered to have a satisfactory self-perceived level of knowledge on ILD. Except sarcoidosis (p=0.017) and some isolated questions on other diseases, no significant differences were found between physicians below 45 years and above. Though, there was a trend to higher awareness in the younger group. The best awareness was seen in sarcoidosis. IPF questions had the worst performance and only 48.5% of GPs recognized the importance of velcro-type crackles in suggesting a possible diagnosis. Conclusion Specific attention should be devoted to educational interventions directed to GPs on basic notions on the main ILDs. This could improve the usual diagnostic delay in many ILDs, as a timely diagnosis is essential for an early treatment and prolonged patient survival.
背景:间质性肺疾病(ILDs)包括一组具有一些临床、功能和放射学相似性的多种实体。在许多国家,初级保健机构缺乏针对ILD基础知识的研究生前和研究生教育干预。这一点,再加上通常表现时症状的非特异性,可能导致这种疾病的诊断延迟。方法:我们设计了一份研究问卷,评估5个“ACeS Baixo Vouga”卫生中心的初级保健医生(gp)对核心ILD(特发性肺纤维化(IPF)、超敏性肺炎、结节病、结缔组织病相关ILD和药物性ILD)基本诊断和管理方面的认识水平,并发现可能存在的不足。还评估了45岁以下和45岁以上的全科医生在认知方面的差异。结果在全球范围内,69%的问题被正确回答,但只有21.9%的全科医生认为对ILD有满意的自我认知水平。除结节病(p=0.017)和其他疾病的个别问题外,45岁以下医师与45岁以上医师之间无显著差异。不过,年轻群体的意识有提高的趋势。结节病的意识最强。IPF问题表现最差,只有48.5%的全科医生认识到魔术贴式裂纹在建议可能诊断中的重要性。结论应特别重视对全科医生的教育干预,使他们了解主要疾病的基本概念。这可以改善许多ild通常的诊断延迟,因为及时诊断对于早期治疗和延长患者生存至关重要。
期刊介绍:
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research.
The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.