Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the morningness – Eveningness questionnaire

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4103/NSN.NSN_110_20
Firat Ozdalyan, Ö. Tütüncü, H. Gümüş, O. Açıkgöz
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the morningness – Eveningness questionnaire","authors":"Firat Ozdalyan, Ö. Tütüncü, H. Gümüş, O. Açıkgöz","doi":"10.4103/NSN.NSN_110_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: People are divided into different chronotypes in relation to their circadian rhythm features. The Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), developed by Horne and Östberg, was the first and is the most used questionnaire for determining the chronotype of people. The reliability and validity of MEQ were tested in this study due to some deficiencies and inconsistencies in previous reliability and validity studies for the Turkish versions of MEQ and deficiencies regarding the validity and reliability of other versions of MEQ. Subjects and Methods: MEQ was translated into Turkish based on the opinions of five academics who were experts in their respective fields and the suitability and content validity of the questionnaire were ensured. The Turkish MEQ was administered to 419 undergraduate students aged 18–34 years. Robust minimum rank factor analysis (MRFA) was used to reveal the construct validity of the questionnaire. Results: As a result of the analyses, the questionnaire was examined in three factors. None of the items were excluded from the study and all items were collected under three factors. The explained total variance value was 42.7%, and the factors explained 64% of common (shared) variance in MRFA. According to the reliability analysis, Cronbach's alpha value for the MEQ Turkish version was satisfactory for the overall questionnaire (0.765). Conclusions: The MEQ version developed in this study is more valid and reliable compared with other versions. However, these results support that a more detailed instrument for morningness and eveningness can be developed.","PeriodicalId":48555,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","volume":"38 1","pages":"50 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/NSN.NSN_110_20","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: People are divided into different chronotypes in relation to their circadian rhythm features. The Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), developed by Horne and Östberg, was the first and is the most used questionnaire for determining the chronotype of people. The reliability and validity of MEQ were tested in this study due to some deficiencies and inconsistencies in previous reliability and validity studies for the Turkish versions of MEQ and deficiencies regarding the validity and reliability of other versions of MEQ. Subjects and Methods: MEQ was translated into Turkish based on the opinions of five academics who were experts in their respective fields and the suitability and content validity of the questionnaire were ensured. The Turkish MEQ was administered to 419 undergraduate students aged 18–34 years. Robust minimum rank factor analysis (MRFA) was used to reveal the construct validity of the questionnaire. Results: As a result of the analyses, the questionnaire was examined in three factors. None of the items were excluded from the study and all items were collected under three factors. The explained total variance value was 42.7%, and the factors explained 64% of common (shared) variance in MRFA. According to the reliability analysis, Cronbach's alpha value for the MEQ Turkish version was satisfactory for the overall questionnaire (0.765). Conclusions: The MEQ version developed in this study is more valid and reliable compared with other versions. However, these results support that a more detailed instrument for morningness and eveningness can be developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其版早-晚性问卷的信度和效度
背景:人们根据他们的昼夜节律特征被分为不同的时型。由Horne和Östberg开发的晨昏问卷(MEQ)是第一个也是最常用的用于确定人的时间类型的问卷。由于以往对土耳其语版MEQ的信度效度研究存在不足和不一致之处,其他版本MEQ的信度效度也存在不足,本研究对MEQ的信度效度进行了检验。研究对象和方法:MEQ根据5位各自领域的专家学者的意见翻译成土耳其语,确保问卷的适用性和内容效度。对419名18-34岁的本科生进行了土耳其MEQ测试。采用稳健最小秩因子分析(MRFA)揭示问卷的结构效度。结果:根据分析结果,问卷从三个方面进行了检验。没有一个项目被排除在研究之外,所有的项目都被收集在三个因素下。总方差解释值为42.7%,因子解释MRFA共有(共享)方差的64%。信度分析显示,土耳其版MEQ的Cronbach α值对整体问卷满意(0.765)。结论:与其他版本相比,本研究开发的MEQ版本更有效、可靠。然而,这些结果支持可以开发更详细的早晨和晚上的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology is the double blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of Turkish Society of Clinical Neurophysiology EEG-EMG. The journal is a quarterly publication, published in March, June, September and December and the publication language of the journal is English.
期刊最新文献
Transcranial Sonography in Parkinson’s Disease and Parkinsonism The liverpool adverse drug events profile (LAEP): Validity and reliability of Turkish version (LAEP-TR) Congenital myasthenic syndrome with a rare mutation diagnosed at adult age Comparison of surgery and local steroid injections for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial High-dose steroids versus standard treatment for myasthenic crisis: A single-center, longitudinal, 12-year retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1