The impact of Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine on public perceptions of EU security and defence integration: a big data analysis

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of European Integration Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/07036337.2023.2183392
O. Fernández, Marie Vandendriessche, Á. Saz-Carranza, N. Agell, Javier A. Franco
{"title":"The impact of Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine on public perceptions of EU security and defence integration: a big data analysis","authors":"O. Fernández, Marie Vandendriessche, Á. Saz-Carranza, N. Agell, Javier A. Franco","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2023.2183392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine sent shockwaves through Europe and led to rapid policy changes concomitant with variations in citizen perceptions. This article analyses how EU public opinion on security and defence matters has reacted to the war: what patterns of change and continuity can be detected, what differences are visible between Member States, and how might those be explained? Our analysis draws on big data-based sentiment analysis of news sources, reflecting a widely recognized connection between media coverage and public opinion – especially during crisis times – and complementing more traditional measurements of citizen perceptions such as opinion polls. Broadly speaking, we find that the invasion has heightened rather than fundamentally altered underlying trends. Our article contributes to a growing literature on the acceptability of European integration in security and defence, showing that publics are generally supportive of it, and regard it as complementary to NATO.","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2183392","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine sent shockwaves through Europe and led to rapid policy changes concomitant with variations in citizen perceptions. This article analyses how EU public opinion on security and defence matters has reacted to the war: what patterns of change and continuity can be detected, what differences are visible between Member States, and how might those be explained? Our analysis draws on big data-based sentiment analysis of news sources, reflecting a widely recognized connection between media coverage and public opinion – especially during crisis times – and complementing more traditional measurements of citizen perceptions such as opinion polls. Broadly speaking, we find that the invasion has heightened rather than fundamentally altered underlying trends. Our article contributes to a growing literature on the acceptability of European integration in security and defence, showing that publics are generally supportive of it, and regard it as complementary to NATO.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯2022年入侵乌克兰对公众对欧盟安全和防务一体化看法的影响:一项大数据分析
摘要2022年俄罗斯入侵乌克兰在欧洲引发了轩然大波,并导致了政策的快速变化,同时公民观念也发生了变化。本文分析了欧盟在安全和国防问题上的公众舆论对战争的反应:可以发现哪些变化和连续性模式,成员国之间存在哪些差异,以及如何解释这些差异?我们的分析借鉴了基于大数据的新闻来源情绪分析,反映了媒体报道与公众舆论之间公认的联系——尤其是在危机时期——并补充了民意调查等更传统的公民感知测量。总的来说,我们发现入侵加剧了而不是从根本上改变了根本趋势。我们的文章为越来越多的关于欧洲在安全和国防方面一体化的可接受性的文献做出了贡献,表明公众普遍支持它,并认为它是对北约的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Perceived constraints from European and international integration: citizens’ feeling of being represented and turnout Strategising solidarity: an examination of the Visegrád group’s role and motivations in EU migration policies A ‘Europe of defence’? The establishment of binding commitments and supranational governance in European security and defence Connecting internal and external dynamics in European intersectoral policy coordination – the case of education and employment From streets to parliament: understanding the mechanisms of protest impact on the policy-making process in the European Parliament’s TTIP debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1