Individual differences in the effectiveness of a narrative-promoting intervention: Relation with executive function skills

IF 1.2 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS First Language Pub Date : 2022-05-18 DOI:10.1177/01427237221092661
E. Veneziano, Eleonora Bartoli
{"title":"Individual differences in the effectiveness of a narrative-promoting intervention: Relation with executive function skills","authors":"E. Veneziano, Eleonora Bartoli","doi":"10.1177/01427237221092661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work is based on previous studies showing that a short conversational intervention (SCI) focusing on the causes of the story events is effective in promoting the causal and mental content of children’s narratives. In these studies, however, not all the children improved their narratives after the SCI). The present study examined individual differences in the effectiveness of the SCI and investigated whether they were related to variation in the children’s executive function skills such as cognitive inhibition and flexibility. Eighty 6- to 8-year-old French-speaking children participated in the narrative task and executive function tasks. In the narrative task, they first told a story (NAR1) based on the Stone Story made up of five wordless pictures involving a misunderstanding between two characters; each child then participated in the SCI, and finally narrated the story a second time (NAR2). Then, the children were presented with executive function tasks. Cognitive inhibition was assessed by the Animal Stroop test, and cognitive flexibility was assessed by a three-criterion classification task and a local/global figure-matching task. Group results showed that the children expressed the misunderstanding between the characters in mental terms significantly more in their second than in their first narratives. Results also showed individual variation in the post-SCI improvements and indicated a significant positive relation between large improvements in the children’s post-SCI narrative and their inhibitory control skills. No significant relations were found in this study between large improvements and the two cognitive flexibility measures. These results suggest that narrative-promoting interventions should closely consider individual differences in the effectiveness of their procedures and envisage working not only on promoting narrative content but also on the skills needed to benefit from the interventions.","PeriodicalId":47254,"journal":{"name":"First Language","volume":"42 1","pages":"523 - 547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237221092661","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work is based on previous studies showing that a short conversational intervention (SCI) focusing on the causes of the story events is effective in promoting the causal and mental content of children’s narratives. In these studies, however, not all the children improved their narratives after the SCI). The present study examined individual differences in the effectiveness of the SCI and investigated whether they were related to variation in the children’s executive function skills such as cognitive inhibition and flexibility. Eighty 6- to 8-year-old French-speaking children participated in the narrative task and executive function tasks. In the narrative task, they first told a story (NAR1) based on the Stone Story made up of five wordless pictures involving a misunderstanding between two characters; each child then participated in the SCI, and finally narrated the story a second time (NAR2). Then, the children were presented with executive function tasks. Cognitive inhibition was assessed by the Animal Stroop test, and cognitive flexibility was assessed by a three-criterion classification task and a local/global figure-matching task. Group results showed that the children expressed the misunderstanding between the characters in mental terms significantly more in their second than in their first narratives. Results also showed individual variation in the post-SCI improvements and indicated a significant positive relation between large improvements in the children’s post-SCI narrative and their inhibitory control skills. No significant relations were found in this study between large improvements and the two cognitive flexibility measures. These results suggest that narrative-promoting interventions should closely consider individual differences in the effectiveness of their procedures and envisage working not only on promoting narrative content but also on the skills needed to benefit from the interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叙述促进干预效果的个体差异:与执行功能技能的关系
这项工作基于先前的研究,研究表明,关注故事事件原因的简短对话干预(SCI)可以有效地促进儿童叙事的因果和心理内容。然而,在这些研究中,并不是所有的儿童在SCI后都改善了他们的叙述)。本研究调查了SCI有效性的个体差异,并调查了它们是否与儿童执行功能技能的变化有关,如认知抑制和灵活性。86至8岁的法语儿童参与了叙事任务和执行功能任务。在叙事任务中,他们首先讲述了一个基于《石头记》的故事(NAR1),由五张涉及两个角色之间误解的无言图片组成;然后,每个孩子都参加了SCI,并最终第二次讲述了这个故事(NAR2)。然后,向孩子们展示执行功能任务。认知抑制通过动物Stroop测试进行评估,认知灵活性通过三标准分类任务和局部/全局图形匹配任务进行评估。小组结果显示,孩子们在第二次叙述中比在第一次叙述中更能在心理上表达角色之间的误解。结果还显示了SCI后改善的个体差异,并表明儿童SCI后叙述的大幅改善与他们的抑制控制技能之间存在显著的正相关。在这项研究中,没有发现大的改善与两种认知灵活性指标之间的显著关系。这些结果表明,促进叙事的干预措施应密切考虑其程序有效性的个体差异,并设想不仅致力于促进叙事内容,还致力于从干预措施中受益所需的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
First Language
First Language Multiple-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: First Language is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in child language acquisition. Child language research is multidisciplinary and this is reflected in the contents of the journal: research from diverse theoretical and methodological traditions is welcome. Authors from a wide range of disciplines - including psychology, linguistics, anthropology, cognitive science, neuroscience, communication, sociology and education - are regularly represented in our pages. Empirical papers range from individual case studies, through experiments, observational/ naturalistic, analyses of CHILDES corpora, to parental surveys.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Does the processing advantage of formulaic language persist in its nonadjacent forms? Evidence from Chinese collocation processing in children” Inflectional morphology and reading comprehension in low SES Arabic-speaking second graders Corrigendum to “Establishing Guidelines for MLU measurement in an agglutinating language: An illustration of Georgian” Development of derivational morphology in Kuwaiti Arabic-speaking children Book Review: Zarchy, R. M. & Geer, L. C., A family-centered signed language curriculum to support deaf children’s language acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1