Burn Wound Bacteriological Profiles, Patient Outcomes, and Tangential Excision Timing: A Prospective, Observational Study.

Q2 Nursing Ostomy Wound Management Pub Date : 2018-08-05 DOI:10.25270/OWM.2018.9.2836
Fang Shao, W. Ren, W. Meng, Gui-zhi Wang, Tian-yun Wang
{"title":"Burn Wound Bacteriological Profiles, Patient Outcomes, and Tangential Excision Timing: A Prospective, Observational Study.","authors":"Fang Shao, W. Ren, W. Meng, Gui-zhi Wang, Tian-yun Wang","doi":"10.25270/OWM.2018.9.2836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nBecause infection can thwart burn healing, microorganisms, their susceptibility patterns, and the effect of tangential excision timing on outcomes of burn patients were examined.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA prospective, observational study was conducted that involved 318 patients with deep second-degree burns from a gas explosion treated in Xinxiang, Henan, China between January 2009 and December 2016. Patient demographic data, culture and antimicrobial susceptibility test results, and outcome variables (resuscitation fluid volume, signs of shock, body temperature, heart rate, and time to wound healing) were analyzed. Outcomes were compared among patients who had early (<24 hours), middle (2 to 7 days), and late (> 7 days) post burn excision.\n\n\nRESULTS\nBacterial culture and drug sensitivity data were available for 314 of the 318 persons with burns >10% of total body surface area (TBSA). Of the 486 bacterial isolates, 330 (67.9%) were gram-negative and 156 (32.1%) were gram-positive. The number of isolates and resistance to third-generation cephalosporins increased over time. Patients having early tangential excision had significantly lower heart rate (P <.05) and reduced time to healing (P <.01) than patients in the middle or late excision group.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nEarly tangential excision was found to be safe and to facilitate healing.","PeriodicalId":54656,"journal":{"name":"Ostomy Wound Management","volume":"64 9 1","pages":"28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ostomy Wound Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/OWM.2018.9.2836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

PURPOSE Because infection can thwart burn healing, microorganisms, their susceptibility patterns, and the effect of tangential excision timing on outcomes of burn patients were examined. METHODS A prospective, observational study was conducted that involved 318 patients with deep second-degree burns from a gas explosion treated in Xinxiang, Henan, China between January 2009 and December 2016. Patient demographic data, culture and antimicrobial susceptibility test results, and outcome variables (resuscitation fluid volume, signs of shock, body temperature, heart rate, and time to wound healing) were analyzed. Outcomes were compared among patients who had early (<24 hours), middle (2 to 7 days), and late (> 7 days) post burn excision. RESULTS Bacterial culture and drug sensitivity data were available for 314 of the 318 persons with burns >10% of total body surface area (TBSA). Of the 486 bacterial isolates, 330 (67.9%) were gram-negative and 156 (32.1%) were gram-positive. The number of isolates and resistance to third-generation cephalosporins increased over time. Patients having early tangential excision had significantly lower heart rate (P <.05) and reduced time to healing (P <.01) than patients in the middle or late excision group. CONCLUSION Early tangential excision was found to be safe and to facilitate healing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烧伤创面细菌学特征、患者预后和切向切除时机:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
目的:由于感染可以阻碍烧伤愈合,我们研究了微生物、它们的易感性模式以及切线切除时机对烧伤患者预后的影响。方法对2009年1月至2016年12月在中国河南新乡治疗的318例瓦斯爆炸致深二度烧伤患者进行前瞻性观察研究。分析患者人口统计数据、培养和抗菌药物敏感性试验结果以及结果变量(复苏液体量、休克迹象、体温、心率和伤口愈合时间)。比较早期(7天)烧伤切除术患者的结果。结果318例烧伤患者中,314例患者的细菌培养及药敏数据均为阴性。486株细菌中革兰氏阴性330株(67.9%),阳性156株(32.1%)。随着时间的推移,分离株数量和对第三代头孢菌素的耐药性增加。早期切向切除组患者心率明显低于中、晚期切向切除组(P < 0.05),愈合时间明显缩短(P < 0.01)。结论早期切向切除是安全的,有利于愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ostomy Wound Management
Ostomy Wound Management 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.99
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ostomy/Wound Management was founded in March of 1980 as "Ostomy Management." In 1985, this small journal dramatically expanded its content and readership by embracing the overlapping disciplines of ostomy care, wound care, incontinence care, and related skin and nutritional issues and became the premier journal of its kind. Ostomy/Wound Managements" readers include healthcare professionals from multiple disciplines. Today, our readers benefit from contemporary and comprehensive review and research papers that are practical, clinically oriented, and cutting edge. Each published article undergoes a rigorous double-blind peer review by members of both the Editorial Advisory Board and the Ad-Hoc Peer Review Panel.
期刊最新文献
Pyoderma gangrenosum and peripheral arterial disease: a case series and literature review Time to refocus on the principles of lower limb ulceration management EWMA 2023 Conference abstracts Effects of local antibiotics in calcium-sulphate granules for the treatment of diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis: a propensity-matched observational study Organisation of NPWT in primary care in Europe – a descriptive survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1