Understanding the immigrant-native gap in childcare use: An empirical exploration for 21 European countries

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Acta Sociologica Pub Date : 2022-05-24 DOI:10.1177/00016993221102506
W. Van Lancker, E. Pavolini
{"title":"Understanding the immigrant-native gap in childcare use: An empirical exploration for 21 European countries","authors":"W. Van Lancker, E. Pavolini","doi":"10.1177/00016993221102506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution, we examine whether and why there is a gap in the use of formal childcare services between immigrant and native families across 21 European countries. We focus on three sets of potential determinants: (1) social class, education and labour market position; (2) immigrant-specific factors such as norms in the region of origin, citizenship acquisition and length of stay in the country of residence; and (3) contextual factors such structural constraints impeding access to childcare and traditional norms on motherhood in the region of origin. Drawing on data from the 2010 ad hoc module of the EU Labour Force Survey, we find evidence for an immigrant-native gap in formal childcare use. Adjusted for social class position, education and maternal employment, immigrant families are less likely to use childcare compared to native families across European countries. However, there are important cross-country differences in the size of this gap. The study also provides evidence for immigrant-specific explanations: acquiring citizenship and staying longer in the country of residence increases the probability to use childcare, while the strength of traditional norms in the region of origin reduces the probability to use childcare. Finally, we find that structural barriers to childcare use negatively affect childcare use for both native and immigrant families. Removing barriers to childcare use in terms of availability and affordability will benefit everyone.","PeriodicalId":47591,"journal":{"name":"Acta Sociologica","volume":"66 1","pages":"74 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Sociologica","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993221102506","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this contribution, we examine whether and why there is a gap in the use of formal childcare services between immigrant and native families across 21 European countries. We focus on three sets of potential determinants: (1) social class, education and labour market position; (2) immigrant-specific factors such as norms in the region of origin, citizenship acquisition and length of stay in the country of residence; and (3) contextual factors such structural constraints impeding access to childcare and traditional norms on motherhood in the region of origin. Drawing on data from the 2010 ad hoc module of the EU Labour Force Survey, we find evidence for an immigrant-native gap in formal childcare use. Adjusted for social class position, education and maternal employment, immigrant families are less likely to use childcare compared to native families across European countries. However, there are important cross-country differences in the size of this gap. The study also provides evidence for immigrant-specific explanations: acquiring citizenship and staying longer in the country of residence increases the probability to use childcare, while the strength of traditional norms in the region of origin reduces the probability to use childcare. Finally, we find that structural barriers to childcare use negatively affect childcare use for both native and immigrant families. Removing barriers to childcare use in terms of availability and affordability will benefit everyone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解移民与本土儿童保育使用的差距:对21个欧洲国家的实证探索
在这篇文章中,我们研究了21个欧洲国家的移民家庭和本地家庭在使用正规儿童保育服务方面是否存在差距,以及为什么存在差距。我们关注三组潜在的决定因素:(1)社会阶层、教育和劳动力市场地位;(2) 移民的具体因素,如原籍地区的规范、获得公民身份和在居住国停留的时间;以及(3)背景因素,如阻碍获得儿童保育的结构性制约因素和原籍地区传统的母性规范。根据2010年欧盟劳动力调查特设模块的数据,我们发现了移民在正式育儿方面存在差距的证据。根据社会阶级地位、教育和孕产妇就业情况进行调整后,与欧洲国家的原生家庭相比,移民家庭不太可能使用儿童保育服务。然而,这一差距的大小存在着重要的跨国差异。该研究还为移民的具体解释提供了证据:获得公民身份并在居住国停留更长时间会增加使用儿童保育的可能性,而原籍国传统规范的力量会降低使用儿童保育服务的可能性。最后,我们发现,儿童保育使用的结构性障碍对本地和移民家庭的儿童保育使用产生了负面影响。消除儿童保育在可用性和可负担性方面的障碍将使每个人都受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Sociologica
Acta Sociologica SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Acta Sociologica is a peer reviewed journal which publishes papers on high-quality innovative sociology peer reviewed journal which publishes papers on high-quality innovative sociology carried out from different theoretical and methodological starting points, in the form of full-length original articles and review essays, as well as book reviews and commentaries. Articles that present Nordic sociology or help mediate between Nordic and international scholarly discussions are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Implant-related and medical complications in patients with sarcopenia undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective matched-cohort analysis. Continuous Time Graph Processes with Known ERGM Equilibria: Contextual Review, Extensions, and Synthesis. The role of education and social background in the changing political involvement of adolescents – a comparative approach Are general skills important for vocationally educated? A diagnosis of society and Nordic sociology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1