Prevalence and risk factors of delirium in psychiatric patients with critical illness

Lina Ren, Yongjun Wang
{"title":"Prevalence and risk factors of delirium in psychiatric patients with critical illness","authors":"Lina Ren,&nbsp;Yongjun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2023.100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Delirium is a serious neuropsychiatric syndrome, which can lead to poor outcomes, especially among patients with critical illness, but is easily missed among psychiatric patients. Some delirium-associated risks have been confirmed for critical patients and psychiatric patients. Nevertheless, the research about delirium in psychiatric patients with critical illness is rare.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study aims to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of delirium in psychiatric patients with critical illness. We assessed 425 patients diagnosed with critical illness from Shenzhen Kangning hospital from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, and registered their demographic information, medical history and comorbidities. Patients underwent a psychiatric examination using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 425 critical illness inpatients, 143 had delirium (prevalence of 33.6%). The most common associations were infectious disease (46.9%), electrolyte disturbance (48.3%), cerebrovascular disease (39.9%), and liver or kidney dysfunction (26.6%). The married status (OR ​= ​3.450, <em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.001), infectious diseases (OR ​= ​2.862, <em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.001), electrolyte disturbances (OR ​= ​1.991, <em>p</em> ​= ​0.009) and the organic mental disorder (OR ​= ​5.611, <em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.001) were independent non-modifiable factors associated with an increased risk of delirium.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>According to the study results, the delirium prevalence was about 33%. The organic mental disorder, infectious disease, electrolyte disturbance, cerebrovascular disease, and liver or kidney dysfunction were the risk factors for delirium in psychiatric patients with critical illness. Unexpectedly, the use of olanzapine or haloperidol showed no relevance to delirium.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598723000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Delirium is a serious neuropsychiatric syndrome, which can lead to poor outcomes, especially among patients with critical illness, but is easily missed among psychiatric patients. Some delirium-associated risks have been confirmed for critical patients and psychiatric patients. Nevertheless, the research about delirium in psychiatric patients with critical illness is rare.

Methods

This study aims to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of delirium in psychiatric patients with critical illness. We assessed 425 patients diagnosed with critical illness from Shenzhen Kangning hospital from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, and registered their demographic information, medical history and comorbidities. Patients underwent a psychiatric examination using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM).

Results

Among the 425 critical illness inpatients, 143 had delirium (prevalence of 33.6%). The most common associations were infectious disease (46.9%), electrolyte disturbance (48.3%), cerebrovascular disease (39.9%), and liver or kidney dysfunction (26.6%). The married status (OR ​= ​3.450, p ​< ​0.001), infectious diseases (OR ​= ​2.862, p ​< ​0.001), electrolyte disturbances (OR ​= ​1.991, p ​= ​0.009) and the organic mental disorder (OR ​= ​5.611, p ​< ​0.001) were independent non-modifiable factors associated with an increased risk of delirium.

Conclusions

According to the study results, the delirium prevalence was about 33%. The organic mental disorder, infectious disease, electrolyte disturbance, cerebrovascular disease, and liver or kidney dysfunction were the risk factors for delirium in psychiatric patients with critical illness. Unexpectedly, the use of olanzapine or haloperidol showed no relevance to delirium.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重症精神病患者谵妄的患病率及危险因素
谵妄是一种严重的神经精神综合征,可导致预后不良,特别是在危重症患者中,但在精神科患者中很容易被忽视。一些谵妄相关的风险已被证实对危重病人和精神病人。然而,关于精神疾病危重患者谵妄的研究却很少。方法探讨危重症精神病人谵妄的患病率及危险因素。我们对2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日在深圳康宁医院诊断为危重疾病的425例患者进行评估,登记其人口统计信息、病史和合并症。患者采用精神错乱评估法(CAM)进行精神检查。结果425例危重住院患者中,谵妄143例,患病率33.6%;最常见的相关性是感染性疾病(46.9%)、电解质紊乱(48.3%)、脑血管疾病(39.9%)和肝肾功能障碍(26.6%)。婚姻状况(OR = 3.450, p <0.001)、传染性疾病(或= 2.862,p & lt;0.001)、电解质紊乱(OR = 1.991, p = 0.009)和器质性精神障碍(OR = 5.611, p <0.001)是与谵妄风险增加相关的独立不可改变因素。结论根据研究结果,谵妄患病率约为33%。器质性精神障碍、感染性疾病、电解质紊乱、脑血管疾病和肝肾功能障碍是危重症患者谵妄的危险因素。出乎意料的是,使用奥氮平或氟哌啶醇与谵妄无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry research communications
Psychiatry research communications Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊最新文献
An investigation into the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and food addiction: The role of urgency and emotion dysregulation Factors related to painful somatic symptoms in patients with depression: The role of gender and anhedonia rtfMRI neurofeedback interventions are not cost prohibitive The impact of childhood sexual, physical and emotional abuse and neglect on suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury: A systematic review of meta-analyses Convergent and predictive validity of the Mini MoCA and considerations for use among older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1