Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of health-related quality of life and mental well-being between persons with and without post COVID-19 condition.

Frontiers in epidemiology Pub Date : 2023-05-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fepid.2023.1144162
Emily Stella Scott, Erica I Lubetkin, Mathieu F Janssen, John Yfantopolous, Gouke J Bonsel, Juanita A Haagsma
{"title":"Cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of health-related quality of life and mental well-being between persons with and without post COVID-19 condition.","authors":"Emily Stella Scott, Erica I Lubetkin, Mathieu F Janssen, John Yfantopolous, Gouke J Bonsel, Juanita A Haagsma","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2023.1144162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Still little is known about the impact of post COVID-19 condition (PC) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and mental well-being. We compared participants with PC with three groups: an acute COVID-19 infection (AC) only, at least one chronic condition (CC) but no COVID-19, or no condition at all, healthy (PH). Between these disease groups, we also estimated and compared HRQOL and mental well-being change over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from six countries (Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States) completed two web-based questionnaires (T1 = April-May 2020 and T2 = April-June 2022). Primary outcomes were HRQOL, measured by EQ-5D-5L and EQ VAS, and mental well-being (measured by World Health Organisation-Five (WHO-5) Well-Being Index, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and General Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7). All analyses were stratified by the disease groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4,999 participants filled out both surveys: 240 were in PC, 107 in AC, 1798 in CC and 2,854 in PH. At T2, the mean EQ-5D-5L index values for the PC, AC, CC and PH groups were 0.70, 0.73, 0.75 and 0.92 (<i>p</i> < .001), respectively. Mean EQ VAS scores were 66, 65, 68 and 81 (<i>p</i> < .001), respectively. Poor mental well-being, depression and anxiety mean values were highest in the PC group (47.7; 9.1; 7.4), followed by the AC group (51.1; 7.7; 5.7), CC group (56.1; 5.2; 4.2) and the PH group (65.6; 2.8; 2.5), respectively (<i>p</i> < .001 between groups). Over time, HRQOL deteriorated in all groups, apart from the PH group. We observed the largest deterioration in the CC (EQ-5D-5L index: Δ0.03, <i>p</i> < .001) and AC group (EQ VAS: Δ6.3, <i>p</i> < .001). For the mental well-being outcomes, deterioration for WHO-5 and PHQ-9 were largest in the AC group (Δ4.8, <i>p</i> = .016; Δ-1.3, <i>p</i> = .012). Rates for GAD-7 improved for the PH and CC groups (PH: Δ1.27, CC: Δ0.56, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the cross-sectional analysis, participants with PC had the worst HRQOL and mental well-being compared to the other groups. In terms of change since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, HRQOL and mental well-being deterioration was highest among AC participants and had a lower impact among PC participants, most likely due to pre-existing chronic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1144162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2023.1144162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Still little is known about the impact of post COVID-19 condition (PC) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and mental well-being. We compared participants with PC with three groups: an acute COVID-19 infection (AC) only, at least one chronic condition (CC) but no COVID-19, or no condition at all, healthy (PH). Between these disease groups, we also estimated and compared HRQOL and mental well-being change over time.

Methods: Participants from six countries (Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States) completed two web-based questionnaires (T1 = April-May 2020 and T2 = April-June 2022). Primary outcomes were HRQOL, measured by EQ-5D-5L and EQ VAS, and mental well-being (measured by World Health Organisation-Five (WHO-5) Well-Being Index, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and General Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7). All analyses were stratified by the disease groups.

Results: In total, 4,999 participants filled out both surveys: 240 were in PC, 107 in AC, 1798 in CC and 2,854 in PH. At T2, the mean EQ-5D-5L index values for the PC, AC, CC and PH groups were 0.70, 0.73, 0.75 and 0.92 (p < .001), respectively. Mean EQ VAS scores were 66, 65, 68 and 81 (p < .001), respectively. Poor mental well-being, depression and anxiety mean values were highest in the PC group (47.7; 9.1; 7.4), followed by the AC group (51.1; 7.7; 5.7), CC group (56.1; 5.2; 4.2) and the PH group (65.6; 2.8; 2.5), respectively (p < .001 between groups). Over time, HRQOL deteriorated in all groups, apart from the PH group. We observed the largest deterioration in the CC (EQ-5D-5L index: Δ0.03, p < .001) and AC group (EQ VAS: Δ6.3, p < .001). For the mental well-being outcomes, deterioration for WHO-5 and PHQ-9 were largest in the AC group (Δ4.8, p = .016; Δ-1.3, p = .012). Rates for GAD-7 improved for the PH and CC groups (PH: Δ1.27, CC: Δ0.56, p < .001).

Conclusions: In the cross-sectional analysis, participants with PC had the worst HRQOL and mental well-being compared to the other groups. In terms of change since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, HRQOL and mental well-being deterioration was highest among AC participants and had a lower impact among PC participants, most likely due to pre-existing chronic disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有和没有COVID-19后病情的人与健康相关的生活质量和心理健康的横断面和纵向比较
关于COVID-19后病情(PC)对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和心理健康的影响,我们知之甚少。我们将PC参与者分为三组:仅急性COVID-19感染(AC),至少一种慢性疾病(CC)但没有COVID-19,或根本没有疾病,健康(PH)。在这些疾病组之间,我们还估计并比较了HRQOL和心理健康随时间的变化。方法来自六个国家(希腊、意大利、荷兰、瑞典、英国和美国)的参与者完成了两份基于网络的问卷调查(T1 = 2020年4月至5月,T2 = 2022年4月至6月)。主要结局是HRQOL(由EQ- 5d - 5l和EQ VAS测量)和精神健康(由世界卫生组织第五版(WHO-5)幸福指数、患者健康问卷(PHQ)-9和一般焦虑障碍(GAD)-7测量)。所有分析均按疾病组进行分层。结果共4999名参与者填写了两项调查,其中PC组240人,AC组107人,CC组1798人,PH组2854人。在T2时,PC组、AC组、CC组和PH组的EQ-5D-5L指数平均值分别为0.70、0.73、0.75和0.92 (p < 0.001)。平均EQ VAS评分分别为66、65、68、81分(p < 0.001)。心理健康状况不佳、抑郁和焦虑的平均值在PC组最高(47.7;9.1;7.4),其次是AC组(51.1;7.7;5.7), CC组(56.1;5.2;4.2)和PH组(65.6;2.8;2.5), p <。组间0.001)。随着时间的推移,除PH组外,所有组的HRQOL均恶化。我们观察到CC组(EQ- 5d - 5l指数:Δ0.03, p < .001)和AC组(EQ VAS: Δ6.3, p < .001)恶化最大。对于心理健康结果,AC组的WHO-5和PHQ-9的恶化最大(Δ4.8, p = 0.016;Δ-1.3, p = .012)。PH组和CC组的GAD-7率均有所提高(PH: Δ1.27, CC: Δ0.56, p < 0.001)。在横断面分析中,与其他组相比,PC参与者的HRQOL和心理健康状况最差。就COVID-19大流行开始以来的变化而言,AC参与者的HRQOL和精神健康恶化最高,PC参与者的影响较低,很可能是由于已有的慢性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of cognitive bias about infectious diseases on social well-being. The spatio-temporal evolution of leishmaniasis in the province of Essaouira. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and associated factors among adult diabetic patients: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Using a computational cognitive model to simulate the effects of personal and social network experiences on seasonal influenza vaccination decisions. Prevalence of occupational injuries and associated factors among solid waste collectors in Jigjiga city, eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1