Rex or Imperator? Kalojan’s Royal Title in the Correspondence with Innocent III

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Studia Ceranea Pub Date : 2019-12-30 DOI:10.18778/2084-140x.09.10
F. Dall’Aglio
{"title":"Rex or Imperator? Kalojan’s Royal Title in the Correspondence with Innocent III","authors":"F. Dall’Aglio","doi":"10.18778/2084-140x.09.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the correspondence between Innocent III and Kalojan of Bulgaria (1197–1207), the title of the Bulgarian ruler is recorded both as rex and imperator. While the pope consistently employs the title rex, Kalojan refers to himself, in every occasion, with the title imperator. Some scholars have speculated that the use of this title was a deliberate political move: styling himself imperator, Kalojan was claiming a much greater political dignity than that of king of Bulgaria, putting himself on the same level as the emperor of Constantinople. On the other hand, while Innocent’s letters were obviously written in Latin, Kalojan’s letters were originally in Bulgarian, translated in Greek, and finally translated from Greek to Latin. Therefore, the use of the word imperator may be just an attempt at translating the term βασιλεύς, not in the sense of Emperor of the Romans but merely in that of autocrat, a ruler whose power was fully independent from any other external political authority. This recognition was of a fundamental importance for Kalojan, since the rulers of Bulgaria’s neighbouring states, the kingdom of Hungary, the Byzantine empire, and especially the Latin empire of Constantinople, were not willing to recognize his legitimacy as an independent sovereign.","PeriodicalId":40873,"journal":{"name":"Studia Ceranea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Ceranea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140x.09.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the correspondence between Innocent III and Kalojan of Bulgaria (1197–1207), the title of the Bulgarian ruler is recorded both as rex and imperator. While the pope consistently employs the title rex, Kalojan refers to himself, in every occasion, with the title imperator. Some scholars have speculated that the use of this title was a deliberate political move: styling himself imperator, Kalojan was claiming a much greater political dignity than that of king of Bulgaria, putting himself on the same level as the emperor of Constantinople. On the other hand, while Innocent’s letters were obviously written in Latin, Kalojan’s letters were originally in Bulgarian, translated in Greek, and finally translated from Greek to Latin. Therefore, the use of the word imperator may be just an attempt at translating the term βασιλεύς, not in the sense of Emperor of the Romans but merely in that of autocrat, a ruler whose power was fully independent from any other external political authority. This recognition was of a fundamental importance for Kalojan, since the rulers of Bulgaria’s neighbouring states, the kingdom of Hungary, the Byzantine empire, and especially the Latin empire of Constantinople, were not willing to recognize his legitimacy as an independent sovereign.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rex还是Imperator?卡洛坚与英诺森三世通信中的皇家头衔
在英诺森三世和保加利亚卡洛詹(1197-1207)之间的通信中,保加利亚统治者的头衔被记录为rex和imperator。虽然教皇一直使用rex这个头衔,但卡洛詹在任何场合都称自己为头衔统治者。一些学者推测,使用这个头衔是一种蓄意的政治举动:卡洛詹自称为统治者,声称自己比保加利亚国王有更大的政治尊严,与君士坦丁堡皇帝处于同一水平。另一方面,虽然英诺森的信件显然是用拉丁语写的,但卡洛詹的信件最初是用保加利亚语写的、用希腊语翻译的,最后从希腊语翻译成拉丁语。因此,使用“统治者”一词可能只是试图翻译“βασιλείς”一词,而不是罗马人皇帝的意思,而只是独裁者的意思,独裁者的权力完全独立于任何其他外部政治权威。这一承认对卡洛詹来说至关重要,因为保加利亚邻国匈牙利王国、拜占庭帝国,尤其是拉丁帝国君士坦丁堡的统治者不愿意承认他作为独立君主的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Ceranea
Studia Ceranea HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Hymnography in Honour of Saints Constantine and Helena and its Connection with Imperial Ideology The Jewish Theme in Theophanes the Confessor’s Testimony on the Prophet Muḥammad Justinian, Pilgrimages and the Theotokos: Imperial Propaganda in De Aedificiis V Basil I’s Path to Power according to the Vita Basilii as a Heroic Myth Representing the Phlegm: the Portrait of the Phlegmatic in Cesare Ripa’s Iconology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1