Are Clinical Predictors of Oral Malignancy Risk Changing? A Sample Study

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Meandros Medical and Dental Journal Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.16046
Nezaket Ezgi Özer, Betul Karaca, C. Gürhan, H. Boyacıoğlu, Umut Aykutlu, P. Güneri
{"title":"Are Clinical Predictors of Oral Malignancy Risk Changing? A Sample Study","authors":"Nezaket Ezgi Özer, Betul Karaca, C. Gürhan, H. Boyacıoğlu, Umut Aykutlu, P. Güneri","doi":"10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.16046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Our study assesss the clinical features of oral lesions that require histological examination and patient-reported symptoms to estimate the risk of malignancy and to determine the presence of any altered features. Materials and Methods: Demographic characteristics of 70 patients and clinical features of lesions were analyzed using chi-square test, Fisher’s Exact test of Independence and discriminant function analysis. Results: Margins, lymphadenopathy, patient’s self-awareness of the lesion associated with mass effect, surface texture, colour, ulceration, loss of function and pain were significant parameters indicating the risk of malignancy (p<0.05). Analyses of the parameters related to the high risk of malignancy have led to a statistical model for clinical differentiation of benign lesions from malignancies with an accuracy of 91.4% (p=0.016). The statistical model demonstrated that the most important discriminative features were margins, surface texture, patient’s self-awareness, lymphadenopathy, loss of function, ulceration, colour, and pain, respectively. Conclusion: In our study, age, gender, duration and localization did not anticipate the nature of the lesion. Our statistical model showed that irregular/indistinct margins and surface textures and the presence of lymphadenopathy have a higher risk of malignancy.","PeriodicalId":18332,"journal":{"name":"Meandros Medical and Dental Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meandros Medical and Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.16046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our study assesss the clinical features of oral lesions that require histological examination and patient-reported symptoms to estimate the risk of malignancy and to determine the presence of any altered features. Materials and Methods: Demographic characteristics of 70 patients and clinical features of lesions were analyzed using chi-square test, Fisher’s Exact test of Independence and discriminant function analysis. Results: Margins, lymphadenopathy, patient’s self-awareness of the lesion associated with mass effect, surface texture, colour, ulceration, loss of function and pain were significant parameters indicating the risk of malignancy (p<0.05). Analyses of the parameters related to the high risk of malignancy have led to a statistical model for clinical differentiation of benign lesions from malignancies with an accuracy of 91.4% (p=0.016). The statistical model demonstrated that the most important discriminative features were margins, surface texture, patient’s self-awareness, lymphadenopathy, loss of function, ulceration, colour, and pain, respectively. Conclusion: In our study, age, gender, duration and localization did not anticipate the nature of the lesion. Our statistical model showed that irregular/indistinct margins and surface textures and the presence of lymphadenopathy have a higher risk of malignancy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔恶性肿瘤风险的临床预测因素是否发生了变化?样本研究
目的:我们的研究评估需要组织学检查的口腔病变的临床特征和患者报告的症状,以评估恶性肿瘤的风险并确定是否存在任何改变的特征。材料与方法:采用卡方检验、Fisher精确独立性检验和判别函数分析等方法,对70例患者的人口学特征和病变的临床特征进行分析。结果:边缘、淋巴结病、患者对病变的自我意识与肿块效应、表面质地、颜色、溃疡、,功能丧失和疼痛是指示恶性肿瘤风险的重要参数(p<0.05)。对与恶性肿瘤高风险相关的参数进行分析,得出了良性病变和恶性肿瘤临床鉴别的统计模型,准确率为91.4%(p=0.016)。统计模型表明,最重要的鉴别特征是边缘,表面质地、患者自我意识、淋巴结病、功能丧失、溃疡、颜色和疼痛。结论:在我们的研究中,年龄、性别、病程和定位没有预测病变的性质。我们的统计模型显示,不规则/模糊的边缘和表面纹理以及淋巴结病的存在具有更高的恶性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Meandros Medical and Dental Journal
Meandros Medical and Dental Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
A Cross-sectional View of Rational Antibiotic Use Glycated Albumin and Hba1c for the Diagnosis of Prediabetes in Obese and Non-obese Individuals Analysis of Dental Treatment Under General Anesthesia in Special Health Care Needs and Uncooperative Healthy Children Fractal Analysis of Nuclear Architecture in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Using Transmission Electron Microscopy: An Original Research Differences in the Differential Expression of MicroRNAs Between Patients with Familial Multiple Sclerosis and Those with Sporadic Multiple Sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1