Physiotherapy Interventions and the Outcomes for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1 on the South Island of New Zealand – A Longitudinal, Prospective Case Series

Q3 Medicine Open Pain Journal Pub Date : 2017-03-23 DOI:10.2174/1876386301710010005
T. Pons, E. Shipton, J. Williman, R. Mulder
{"title":"Physiotherapy Interventions and the Outcomes for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1 on the South Island of New Zealand – A Longitudinal, Prospective Case Series","authors":"T. Pons, E. Shipton, J. Williman, R. Mulder","doi":"10.2174/1876386301710010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physiotherapy is considered in pain medicine to be a key element in the management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). This is the first paper to document and categorise all physiotherapy intervention methods used as well as evaluate the outcomes of a case series of 18 CRPS patients attending physiotherapy in a prospective, longitudinal study across a region. Outcomes were measured across the region of the South Island of New Zealand over 1 year through independent telephonic interviewing of the pain experience with the McGill Pain Questionnaire-short form, function with Foot Function Index for the lower limb or Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand for the upper limb, and quality of life with the World Health Organisation Disability Schedule. Clinical records were accessed for each CRPS participant following discharge from physiotherapy to categorise the intervention methods used. Seventeen participants received intervention for both functional restoration with pain modulation and only one participant received functional restoration with no pain modulation; 12 also received immobilisation with 10 receiving passive interventions. All outcome measures improved significantly by 6 months and were maintained at 1 year. Eighty five percent had their diagnosis of CRPS confirmed within 3 months of their injury; half had fracture as the precipitating injury for their onset of CRPS with a third following soft tissue injury and 11% following surgery. Physiotherapists showed a high variation with the intervention methods used and showed a greater proportion of intervention methods focusing on functional restoration followed by pain modulating interventions. Future research is necessary to define what physiotherapy interventions are efficacious in the management of CRPS.","PeriodicalId":53614,"journal":{"name":"Open Pain Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Pain Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876386301710010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Physiotherapy is considered in pain medicine to be a key element in the management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). This is the first paper to document and categorise all physiotherapy intervention methods used as well as evaluate the outcomes of a case series of 18 CRPS patients attending physiotherapy in a prospective, longitudinal study across a region. Outcomes were measured across the region of the South Island of New Zealand over 1 year through independent telephonic interviewing of the pain experience with the McGill Pain Questionnaire-short form, function with Foot Function Index for the lower limb or Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand for the upper limb, and quality of life with the World Health Organisation Disability Schedule. Clinical records were accessed for each CRPS participant following discharge from physiotherapy to categorise the intervention methods used. Seventeen participants received intervention for both functional restoration with pain modulation and only one participant received functional restoration with no pain modulation; 12 also received immobilisation with 10 receiving passive interventions. All outcome measures improved significantly by 6 months and were maintained at 1 year. Eighty five percent had their diagnosis of CRPS confirmed within 3 months of their injury; half had fracture as the precipitating injury for their onset of CRPS with a third following soft tissue injury and 11% following surgery. Physiotherapists showed a high variation with the intervention methods used and showed a greater proportion of intervention methods focusing on functional restoration followed by pain modulating interventions. Future research is necessary to define what physiotherapy interventions are efficacious in the management of CRPS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰南岛1型复杂区域性疼痛综合征(CRPS)的物理治疗干预和结果——纵向前瞻性病例系列
在疼痛医学中,物理治疗被认为是复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)治疗的关键因素。这是第一篇记录和分类所有使用的物理治疗干预方法的论文,并在一项跨地区的前瞻性纵向研究中评估了18名CRPS患者接受物理治疗的病例系列的结果。结果通过独立电话访谈在新西兰南岛地区测量了1年以上的疼痛经历,使用麦吉尔疼痛问卷(简短形式),下肢的功能与足功能指数或上肢的手臂、肩膀和手的残疾,以及世界卫生组织残疾时间表的生活质量。在物理治疗结束后,对每位CRPS参与者的临床记录进行访问,以对所使用的干预方法进行分类。17名参与者接受了功能恢复和疼痛调节的干预,只有1名参与者接受了功能恢复而没有疼痛调节;12人接受固定,10人接受被动干预。所有结局指标在6个月时均显著改善,并维持1年。85%的人在受伤后3个月内确诊为CRPS;一半的CRPS发病的诱发性损伤是骨折,三分之一是软组织损伤,11%是手术。物理治疗师在使用的干预方法上表现出很大的差异,并且显示出更大比例的干预方法侧重于功能恢复,然后是疼痛调节干预。未来的研究需要明确哪些物理治疗干预措施在治疗CRPS中是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Pain Journal
Open Pain Journal Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Occupational Stress Levels and Coping Strategies among Nurses Working in an Urban Metropolis in North Central Nigeria Sample Size Estimation for a Non-Inferiority Pain Management Trial Anesthetic Effects of Sevoflurane on the Mouse Somatosensory Cortex: A Flavoprotein Fluorescence Imaging Study Prevalence and Factors Associated with Acute Postoperative Pain after Emergency Abdominal Surgery Strength of excitation and insomnia as mediated by mood dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1