Lack of clinically meaningful anatomical variations in bone marrow apparent diffusion coefficient in diffuse pattern myeloma allows untargeted sampling to confirm disease burden

K. A., O’Connor S, Boyd K, K. M, Blackledge M, Koh Dm, Messiou C
{"title":"Lack of clinically meaningful anatomical variations in bone marrow apparent diffusion coefficient in diffuse pattern myeloma allows untargeted sampling to confirm disease burden","authors":"K. A., O’Connor S, Boyd K, K. M, Blackledge M, Koh Dm, Messiou C","doi":"10.14312/2399-8172.2020-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Posterior iliac crest trephine may result in sampling error and incorrect measures of disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma. This may influence the decision to treat. To compare the regional apparent diffusion coefficient of bone marrow in patients with multiple myeloma without focal bone lesions and their correlation with indices of disease burden, whole-body diffusion weighted imaging of 48 patients with diffuse myeloma were retrospectively reviewed. Three regions of interest were drawn over four anatomical sites on apparent diffusion coefficient maps and average values recorded. Apparent diffusion coefficient values were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with p-value < 0.0125 (Bonferroni correction) taken as statistical significance. Average apparent diffusion coefficient values were correlated with age-adjusted marrow cellularity and plasma cell proportion at histopathology, and international staging system scores. There was no significant difference in the apparent diffusion coefficient of bone marrow in the left ilium (754 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s), right ilium (733 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s) and T6 (701 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s) but it was significantly lower in L3 (636 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s) (p-value < 0.0125). However, the variance of apparent diffusion coefficient across all sites were within limits of measurement repeatability (15%). No correlation was found between per-patient average apparent diffusion coefficient with age-adjusted marrow cellularity (p=0.7), proportion of plasma cells (p=0.2) or ISS scores (p=0.5). There was no clinically meaningful difference in apparent diffusion coefficient values across anatomical sites in diffuse myeloma. Untargeted bone marrow biopsy is likely to be representative in this patient group.","PeriodicalId":73922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiology and imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiology and imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14312/2399-8172.2020-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Posterior iliac crest trephine may result in sampling error and incorrect measures of disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma. This may influence the decision to treat. To compare the regional apparent diffusion coefficient of bone marrow in patients with multiple myeloma without focal bone lesions and their correlation with indices of disease burden, whole-body diffusion weighted imaging of 48 patients with diffuse myeloma were retrospectively reviewed. Three regions of interest were drawn over four anatomical sites on apparent diffusion coefficient maps and average values recorded. Apparent diffusion coefficient values were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with p-value < 0.0125 (Bonferroni correction) taken as statistical significance. Average apparent diffusion coefficient values were correlated with age-adjusted marrow cellularity and plasma cell proportion at histopathology, and international staging system scores. There was no significant difference in the apparent diffusion coefficient of bone marrow in the left ilium (754 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s), right ilium (733 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s) and T6 (701 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s) but it was significantly lower in L3 (636 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s) (p-value < 0.0125). However, the variance of apparent diffusion coefficient across all sites were within limits of measurement repeatability (15%). No correlation was found between per-patient average apparent diffusion coefficient with age-adjusted marrow cellularity (p=0.7), proportion of plasma cells (p=0.2) or ISS scores (p=0.5). There was no clinically meaningful difference in apparent diffusion coefficient values across anatomical sites in diffuse myeloma. Untargeted bone marrow biopsy is likely to be representative in this patient group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥漫性骨髓瘤中骨髓表观扩散系数缺乏临床意义的解剖变化,允许非靶向取样来确认疾病负担
后髂骨环甲可能导致抽样误差和不正确的测量疾病负担的多发性骨髓瘤患者。这可能会影响治疗的决定。为比较无局灶性骨髓瘤患者骨髓区域表观弥散系数及其与疾病负担指标的相关性,回顾性分析48例弥漫性骨髓瘤患者的全身弥散加权成像。在四个解剖部位绘制了三个感兴趣的区域,并记录了表观扩散系数图和平均值。表观扩散系数值的比较采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验,p值< 0.0125 (Bonferroni校正)为有统计学意义。平均表观扩散系数值与年龄调整后的组织病理学骨髓细胞和浆细胞比例以及国际分期系统评分相关。骨髓表观扩散系数在左髂骨(754 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s)、右髂骨(733 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s)和T6 (701 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s)无显著差异,但在L3 (636 × 10 -6 mm 2 /s)显著降低(p值< 0.0125)。然而,所有地点的表观扩散系数方差均在测量可重复性的限制范围内(15%)。每位患者平均表观扩散系数与年龄调整后的骨髓细胞数量(p=0.7)、浆细胞比例(p=0.2)或ISS评分(p=0.5)无相关性。弥漫性骨髓瘤各解剖部位的表观扩散系数值无临床意义差异。非靶向骨髓活检可能在该患者组中具有代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Massive localized lymphedema of the thigh: Pseudosarcoma of the morbidly obese Further development of the preceding Gaussian-pencil-beam-model used for calculation of the in-water dose caused by clinical electron-beam irradiation A revised Gaussian pencil beam model for calculation of the in-water dose caused by clinical electron-beam irradiation Fast magnetic resonance arthrography of the labrum Analytic continuation and incomplete data tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1