Utility of Trend of Nephrocheck® (IGFBP7 × TIMP-2) Biomarker for Early Identification of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis or Respiratory Failure

Gupta Ena, Sujith Ravi, Sidhu Nimrita, C. M. Martinez, B. Michael, Awsare Bharat
{"title":"Utility of Trend of Nephrocheck® (IGFBP7 × TIMP-2) Biomarker for Early Identification of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis or Respiratory Failure","authors":"Gupta Ena, Sujith Ravi, Sidhu Nimrita, C. M. Martinez, B. Michael, Awsare Bharat","doi":"10.23937/2572-3286.1510039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Many studies have shown the association between acute kidney injury (AKI) and morbidity and mortality in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Traditional measures of AKI, such as serum creatinine and urine output, fail to show dynamic changes in renal function. A feasibility study was performed to evaluate the Nephrocheck® test system which comprises of two biomarkers (Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2)) to screen for patients at risk for AKI in the ICU and to guide management. Methods: Patients were enrolled between November 2016 and March 2017 with respiratory failure or sepsis with no pre-existing elevation in the creatinine admitted to the ICU. In patients with an initial Nephrocheck® value ≥ 0.3, the primary team was notified and a kidney protective bundle was suggested. A repeat Nephrocheck® test was performed within 24 hours in those patients with initial value ≥ 0.3. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled. Six (30%) patients developed AKI during first week of ICU stay. All six patients had initial Nephrocheck® values ≥ 0.3 that subsequently increased with the second Nephrocheck® test at 24 hours. Seven patients had normal Nephrocheck® values on admission and did not develop AKI. Interestingly, seven patients who had initial Nephrocheck® values ≥ 0.3 that decreased at 24 hours did not develop AKI. Conclusion: The trend of the Nephrocheck® values was more significant than the initial value for the development of AKI. The Nephrocheck® test may be used as an early indicator of development of AKI. However, further studies are needed to determine if nephron-protective interventions can be helpful in mitigating this risk.","PeriodicalId":73669,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical nephrology and renal care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical nephrology and renal care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-3286.1510039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many studies have shown the association between acute kidney injury (AKI) and morbidity and mortality in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Traditional measures of AKI, such as serum creatinine and urine output, fail to show dynamic changes in renal function. A feasibility study was performed to evaluate the Nephrocheck® test system which comprises of two biomarkers (Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2)) to screen for patients at risk for AKI in the ICU and to guide management. Methods: Patients were enrolled between November 2016 and March 2017 with respiratory failure or sepsis with no pre-existing elevation in the creatinine admitted to the ICU. In patients with an initial Nephrocheck® value ≥ 0.3, the primary team was notified and a kidney protective bundle was suggested. A repeat Nephrocheck® test was performed within 24 hours in those patients with initial value ≥ 0.3. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled. Six (30%) patients developed AKI during first week of ICU stay. All six patients had initial Nephrocheck® values ≥ 0.3 that subsequently increased with the second Nephrocheck® test at 24 hours. Seven patients had normal Nephrocheck® values on admission and did not develop AKI. Interestingly, seven patients who had initial Nephrocheck® values ≥ 0.3 that decreased at 24 hours did not develop AKI. Conclusion: The trend of the Nephrocheck® values was more significant than the initial value for the development of AKI. The Nephrocheck® test may be used as an early indicator of development of AKI. However, further studies are needed to determine if nephron-protective interventions can be helpful in mitigating this risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nephrocheck®(IGFBP7×TIMP-2)生物标志物在脓毒症或呼吸衰竭危重患者急性肾损伤早期识别中的应用
引言:许多研究表明,急性肾损伤(AKI)与重症监护室(ICU)的发病率和死亡率之间存在关联。传统的AKI指标,如血清肌酐和尿量,无法显示肾功能的动态变化。进行了一项可行性研究,以评估由两种生物标志物(胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白7(IGFBP7)和金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂-2(TIMP-2))组成的Nephrocheck®测试系统,以筛查ICU中有AKI风险的患者并指导管理。方法:在2016年11月至2017年3月期间,因呼吸衰竭或败血症入院的患者,其先前没有肌酐升高。在初始Nephrocheck®值≥0.3的患者中,通知主要团队并建议使用肾脏保护束。对于初始值≥0.3的患者,在24小时内进行重复肾检查®测试。结果:20名患者入选。6名(30%)患者在入住ICU的第一周出现AKI。所有6名患者的初始Nephrocheck®值均≥0.3,随后在24小时进行第二次Nephrochell®测试后,该值增加。7名患者入院时Nephrocheck®值正常,未出现AKI。有趣的是,7名初始Nephrocheck®值≥0.3并在24小时内下降的患者没有出现AKI。结论:Nephrocheck®值的趋势对AKI的发展比初始值更显著。Nephrocheck®测试可作为AKI发展的早期指标。然而,还需要进一步的研究来确定肾单位保护性干预措施是否有助于降低这种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Methanol Intoxication due to Lapen Jamu Consumption: A Case Report Complement-Mediated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: Management Challenge behind the Diagnosis - A Case Report Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir-Based Regimens in Patients with Viral Hepatitis C and Stage 4 and 5 Chronic Kidney Disease: The Cameroon Experience Renal Angina Index and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio: Predictive of Acute Kidney Injury in PICU Muco-Cutaneous Manifestations in 144 Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1